repetition of a positional pattern is the secret to predict lottery numbers.

Reply #14

JeetKuneDoLotto — Mon, 02 Sep 2019 22:35:35 GMT

Don't you mean a- [2/5] b- [5/5] or q-[5/2]?

At least for starters. a- [Classic] b- [Bottom] q- [Reverse]

Trust the plan

Reply #13

martor854 — Mon, 02 Sep 2019 18:09:48 GMT

Hi Stat$talker,

It seems to me dr san is kind of complicating things rather than simplifying them. I totally agree with you the most important thing is finding the numbers. The good ones, that is. It's a pity you lost the big one by 1 number. I hope you hit it big next time. As for Bluskov, I found it overrated. I've got both of his orange books. His designer sets never worked for me. I found somewhere a definition for probability: ... it's what the math book wants mother nature to do but mot... [ More ]

Reply #12

Stat$talker — Sun, 01 Sep 2019 20:25:24 GMT

I agree... 13,983,816 combos to 10,068,347,520 arrangements.... Those are some pretty dizzying figures..!! I use Illiya Bluskov's books for my number selection arrangements.. that's of course AFTER I've chosen my numbers...I missed an $8.4 Million dollar pick-6 jackpot by 1 number...!! Proof that you really don't need all those combinations to win..but now, I can't stay online too long with my computer for when I do... All that gets attacked is my lottery software..a sign that somebody's NOT too... [ More ]

Reply #11

dr san — Fri, 09 Aug 2019 17:23:25 GMT

hello matx think if you separate the last digit from 49/6 or last digit from 0 to 9

in ascending order we have 5005

but if you put in positional you will have a million combinations = 10x10x10x10x10x10 = one million

but put yourself in a growing way

it's 5005 las digits

Reply #10

martor854 — Fri, 09 Aug 2019 15:13:08 GMT

Hello dr san,

I can only dmire your enthusiasm even if I do not quite share it. Frankly, I can see it as an unnecessary complication of things. I have the feeling that you are somehow pushing the problem from combinations to arrangements. In other words, if the position of digits becomes essential, the sequences 12-35 and 35-12 will be different from each other even if we have the same numbers and the same digits.

Thus, 1,2,3,4,5,6 and 1,2,3,4,6,5, a.s.o., will be different patterns (in to... [ More ]

Reply #9

dr san — Fri, 09 Aug 2019 05:06:17 GMT

hello, martor 854.ha works on the net that talks about tossing a coin

dice heads or tails, and that all random but

it's like a single digit,

already in an example draw = 49/6 we have 12 digits

6 initial digits and 6 last digits ie when it combines sequences, the thing changes when the repetition, one thing is a coin or coin

and something else is a string of heads or tails

I mean by that we should see double

broken, quadrupled in the case of 49/6 of the previous draws, to use... [ More ]

Reply #8

martor854 — Fri, 09 Aug 2019 01:34:00 GMT

Hello dr san,

Could you be more specific bout your idea of unrepeated sequences and patterns by position ?

unrepeated seuences = 6-number combinations are unrepeated sequences... do yoy mean triples, quads, etc.

patterns by position = position by naturally drawn order? Position after left-to-right sorting?

What would be the relevance of the concepts above?

Best regards.

Reply #7

dr san — Thu, 08 Aug 2019 14:39:46 GMT

hello Kosh I don't know how to program, but I'm trying

a way to filter patterns by positions

sequences from previous decades, or

try to see the solution within the problem, try to see unrepeated sequences from previous draws

What do you think of the concept

Reply #6

Kosh — Thu, 08 Aug 2019 02:35:09 GMT

So are you working on making a software program for that

Reply #5

dr san — Wed, 07 Aug 2019 06:42:54 GMT

in lottery there is always the beginning

middle and end of a cycle, by the whole and by position by position. the problem is knowing how to play and stop playing

Reply #4

Geodesic — Wed, 07 Aug 2019 02:39:45 GMT

... does not repeat the pattern sequences from previous draws.

Is that different from a random sequence

Reply #3

dr san — Tue, 06 Aug 2019 19:05:34 GMT

The mathematical challenge is to create an evolutionary algorithm that does not repeat the pattern sequences from previous draws.

Reply #2

dr san — Tue, 06 Aug 2019 18:00:43 GMT

sorry, it would be a change of standards, not numbers

Reply #1

dr san — Tue, 06 Aug 2019 17:59:42 GMT

in a gaming system that you want to keep for lots of draws, you have

exclude doubles and cracks and put new ones, ie keep the same numbers, always change half

repetition of a positional pattern is the secret to predict lottery numbers.

dr san — Tue, 06 Aug 2019 13:09:35 GMT

repetition of a positional pattern is the secret

to predict lottery numbers.

so we have positions in ascending order

of a draw, all we have to do is see the standards

which repeat in each position, not numbers but patterns 5/5 or 8/2.