Pairs from one digit

Reply #33

Scrubber — Tue, 15 Jun 2021 11:41:32 GMT

Been looking at this and thinking it's part of a larger system. Not just 2, 3, 4, by itself, but just one rung of a ladder.

Using 2, 3, 4, to get the pairs initially, then another step to find the numbers that will show.

Will look into companion methods to see if I'm right.

Reply #32

lakerben — Mon, 14 Jun 2021 16:27:33 GMT

Nm

151

000

897

Reply #31

Scrubber — Fri, 11 Jun 2021 00:15:51 GMT

To a lesser degree, if you take 5,6,7 instead of 2,3,4 / 2+3=5, 2+4=6, 3+4=7, you still get pairs if you add to the number.

June 9 mid 621 eve 798

621

567 756 675 / 567 with numbers shifted to the right

Combos

188 377 296

164 974 056

Use these combos as you would a 2 of 3 wheel. The 97 in 974 shows in the eve 798. Making that 2u4u or 2,4 from the 5.

Or using the repeat digits 1 4 6 7 8 9 and making pairs/combos from that.

These don't show as often as using 2,3,4 on eac... [ More ]

Reply #30

lakerben — Wed, 09 Jun 2021 17:14:44 GMT

You never know in the lottery.

Reply #29

Scrubber — Sat, 05 Jun 2021 18:01:53 GMT

These pairs also appear in the infamous $99 2 out of 3 wheel minus the 32 pair.

Combination of the two maybe? Narrow down select pairs.

Interesting.

Reply #28

ALX — Sat, 05 Jun 2021 15:19:58 GMT

It seems like a lot of numbers to choose from if you do the 234 on each of the three numbers from the last game so why not pick out duplicating pairs like this:

562

7 8 9 3 2 1 for the 5

8 9 0 4 3 2 for the 6

4 5 6 0 9 8 for the 2

Now pick out the duplicating pairs that are: 89 90 80 32.

The winning # was 0 9 9, so the 90 pair is there.

099

2 3 4 8 7 6 for the 0

1 2 3 7 6 5 for the 9

Duplicating pairs are: 23 76

The winning # was 6 0 7, so the 67 pair was there.

Reply #27

Scrubber — Fri, 04 Jun 2021 08:23:07 GMT

Still trying to crack this nut. 23-24-34 digits off patterns. Someone with a bigger brain might be able to see the missing piece to this.

Ontario's mid 562 was followed by eve 099

The pair came from the 2. 2d-0 3d-9 23pattern

It also came from 6. 3u-9 4u-0 34pattern

Still jumping here first digit/ last digit between draws. With a couple from the middle as expected.

Some link between the first and last digit? Or the middle digit

and the first/last digit? There's definitely somet... [ More ]

Reply #26

lakerben — Fri, 28 May 2021 03:32:40 GMT

Are you still using this. Updates? I think you have something here. Don't give up.

Reply #25

Scrubber — Sun, 23 May 2021 18:27:38 GMT

Something that works if you have the budget and a little patience is to take the top 5 numbers from the past week and make 10 box combos. At least one is likely to hit at some point the following week. This is a good method for games that only cost $0.25 - $0.50 a play. For games that cost $1 a play, the pay off just isn't there as it may not hit for 6 - 7 days.

But it does work.

Reply #24

Scrubber — Sun, 23 May 2021 18:13:11 GMT

Quite often you will see one digit will be plus/minus off by one number. Just not always in the pair.

Reply #23

Britt4021 — Sat, 22 May 2021 23:57:03 GMT

New Mexico haven't had the 8 in the first position on these numbers looking (863/836 or 830/803) looking for these to fall straight with the 8 in the front....just trying to share money nuggets!

Good luck

Reply #22

tianca — Sat, 22 May 2021 22:37:45 GMT

HI.....what helping me here in ON is this for pairs.....im watching pairs by vtrc......with plus one and two

ex.......O1 O2 56 57 group one

12 13 67 68 group two

23 24 78 79 group three

34 35 89 80 group four

45 46 90 91 group five

Reply #21

lakerben — Sat, 22 May 2021 20:10:48 GMT

Good job

Reply #20

Scrubber — Sat, 22 May 2021 18:58:00 GMT

Trying to find what the commonality is here. Why does this happen draw after draw. In Ontario, it seams to leap frog between the first and last digit on each draw. Didn't happen this morning, but I never said it was 100%.

The fact that this works across multiple p3s is why I'm still working on it.

Reply #19

lakerben — Sat, 22 May 2021 04:17:25 GMT

Any updates

Reply #18

Scrubber — Sat, 08 May 2021 00:59:49 GMT

Still going strong with this one. If anyone's interested. Pairs showing up nearly every draw doing this.

Reply #17

Scrubber — Tue, 20 Apr 2021 07:38:08 GMT

That should read -+2, -+3, -+4.

3 groups of 6 digits, but the next draw so far, shows in one group around 70% a week, or 2 - 3 draws before a miss.

2 digits from one row, one from the other.

Still too many combos though.

Reply #16

lakerben — Tue, 20 Apr 2021 04:14:46 GMT

Reply #15

Scrubber — Mon, 19 Apr 2021 06:51:31 GMT

Making baby steps. I did find that if you take the last draw and do a +2, +3, +4 on each digit, you get the full number for next draw a lot.

Still need to get the pairs down. But this does work.

Anyways Nm 552 Mid - 861 Eve Apr 16

81 pair off the 5 3u, 4d (34)

digit 6 4u from the 2

Apr 16 Eve through 18 Eve

861-467 off the 8 2d4d 64 (24), 3u off the 1 - 7

467-744 3u from the 4 - 7, 2d from the 6 - 4 (23 combined)

744-687 2u4u 68 (24) from the 4

687-820 2u4u 02(24

Reply #14

lakerben — Sat, 17 Apr 2021 01:37:02 GMT

How's it going with this method?

More examples?

Nm

552

Reply #13

Scrubber — Thu, 25 Mar 2021 05:44:22 GMT

Not trying to get off on the wrong foot here but as I stated before, a second pair method like wheeler's +22 would be needed to reduce the number of coming pairs for the next draw. If someone has a better pair method please share.

Test this with your p3. I think you'll find this does work.

Reply #12

adobea78 — Thu, 25 Mar 2021 03:09:36 GMT

What's the odds for a pair for a cycle?

The total pairs is 100 for P3

Three digits is drawn each cycle (9 pairs to consider).

P3 is a digit replacement draw, ie each digit is drawn from 10

The probability of any pair is less than 1%, factor this into your

method.

Reply #11

Scrubber — Wed, 24 Mar 2021 20:44:59 GMT

Yes, exactly. That's why another accurate pair method would be useful in whittling down the junk.

This does work with any Pick 3. If it could be reduced to 3 possible pairs, that would be awesome.

Would be even better if the third digit was in the other pairs.

Reply #10

lottoswe — Wed, 24 Mar 2021 19:55:25 GMT

Here you have all pairs

1- 34 35 45 98 97 87 38 37 49 47 59 58

2- 45 46 56 09 08 98 49 48 50 58 60 69

3- 56 57 67 10 19 09 50 59 61 69 71 70

4- 67 68 78 21 20 10 61 60 72 70 82 81

5- 78 79 89 32 31 21 72 71 83 81 93 92

6- 89 80 90 43 42 32 83 82 94 92 04 03

7- 90 91 01 54 53 43 94 93 05 03 15 14

8- 01 02 12 65 64 54 05 04 16 14 26 25

9- 12 13 23 76 75 65 16 15 27 25 37 36

0- 23 24 34 87 86 76 27 26 38 36 48 47

Reply #9

Scrubber — Wed, 24 Mar 2021 05:22:23 GMT

I'm not very good with excel (wouldn't know where to begin). If there is another member who is an excel wizard, I would not object to making this available to everyone.

In the meantime - 2,3 /2,4 /3,4 digits u/d using one digit from the last draw can be done with pen and paper.

The only issue is you need to do this with each digit. One of those digits will produce the pair. Hence the need for another pair method that is fairly accurate (wheeler's +22 for example). If the same pair shows up... [ More ]

Reply #8

lakerben — Wed, 24 Mar 2021 01:49:51 GMT

This would be great in excel

Reply #7

Scrubber — Wed, 24 Mar 2021 01:29:52 GMT

3/21/2021 EVE 261 the 4 from 144 2d 3d

3/22/2021 EVE 254 the 6 from 546 2d 4d

Reply #6

tokecap — Wed, 24 Mar 2021 00:11:53 GMT

https://www.nmlottery.com/drawings/drawing-results/

3/21/2021 DAY 144

144/22=6,545454545454545 *

3/22/2021 DAY 546

Reply #5

Scrubber — Tue, 23 Mar 2021 21:40:22 GMT

Most draws seem to follow this pattern. From one of the previous draw digits you can get 23u/d, 24u/d, or 34u/d.

Of course this isn't 100%, but there are a lot of draws like this.

Using wheeler's +22, I'm trying to reduce the number of pairs to a playable level. But as I said, Wheeler's +22 doesn't seem to work too well with doubles.

Right now there are just too many pairs to play.

Reply #4

Scrubber — Tue, 23 Mar 2021 21:24:29 GMT

CDDVD in Ontario your last draw would be 881. The next draw pair 97 in 957 came from the digit 1 in 881.

It was sequential 2d and 4d.

Reply #3

Scrubber — Tue, 23 Mar 2021 21:17:07 GMT

Lakerben in new Mexico your last draw would be 254. The next draw pair 38 in 348 came from the digit 5 in 254. It was a split 2d and 3u.

Reply #2

cddvd — Tue, 23 Mar 2021 19:55:00 GMT

no clue either

Reply #1

lakerben — Tue, 23 Mar 2021 19:41:32 GMT

Interesting. I don't have a clue what you are doing but, maybe someone can excel it to save endless explanations.

Pairs from one digit

Scrubber — Tue, 23 Mar 2021 19:31:06 GMT

Here's what I've seen. Take any past draw, out of the 3 digits drawn, one of them ( sometimes 2) will be

2 and 3 digits off 2 and 4 digits off 3 and 4 digits off

These can be sequential u/d or split u/d.

Ex: not a real draw just what it would look like

123 next draw 902

Sequential

1- 34 35 45 98 97 87

2- 45 46 56 09 08 98

3- 56 57 67 10 19 09

Split

1- 38 37 49 47 59 58

2- 49 48 50 58 60 69

3- 50 59 61 69 71 70

They all seem to come up around the same num... [ More ]