what helps to win a lottery? lots of bets and quality in math, statistics and filters studies

Reply #39

Soledad — Tue, 15 Jun 2021 15:14:22 GMT

Signs=dominoes. Eventually the last one falls.

Reply #38

Charloot — Tue, 15 Jun 2021 05:25:46 GMT

Using your states Quick Pick, they want to win too

Reply #37

rcbbuckeye — Tue, 15 Jun 2021 03:55:57 GMT

He can't answer Mr-B 216 because he doesn't know.

Stat has to blame somebody when he loses, the lotteries are an easy target.

The real answer is the ODDS.

Reply #36

Mr-B 216 — Tue, 15 Jun 2021 01:20:53 GMT

Ok, you go on and keep dodging my question. It tells all I need to know.

Reply #35

Stat$talker — Tue, 15 Jun 2021 01:04:40 GMT

I'm not asking them, I'm asking you for your opinion. All of a sudden you got nuthin' huh?

Let me rephrase the question for you. If math probability, in your opinion, is a sure fire way to win lotteries, why haven't any of the premier mathematicians been able to do it?

No...let me rephrase YOUR question to YOU...you're now asking ME for MY OPINION?...

Now ?, All of a sudden , YOU have respect for MY OPINION?... when all along I've been posting scientific facts per Probability Math si... [ More ]

Reply #34

Mr-B 216 — Tue, 15 Jun 2021 00:25:54 GMT

You'd need to ask other Mathematicians why THEY don't...as I can't speak for THEM..!!

I'm not asking them, I'm asking you for your opinion. All of a sudden you got nuthin' huh?

Let me rephrase the question for you. If math probability, in your opinion, is a sure fire way to win lotteries, why haven't any of the premier mathematicians been able to do it? Why, in your opinion, don't we see any hints anywhere of foul play by the lotteries when it comes to math probability (other than from y... [ More ]

Reply #33

Stat$talker — Mon, 14 Jun 2021 23:59:41 GMT

You'd need to ask other Mathematicians why THEY don't...as I can't speak for THEM..!!

Here's the thing..!! There were other Scientists in Galileo's day that had just as much knowledge as he, but didn't become the first to understand how Math proved exactly how the Heavenly Bodies moved..

The Wright Bros weren't the only Engineers intrested in flight in their day, but were the first to achieve it mechanically...but even THAT'S debatable, if you've ever watched the Documentary Ancient Aliens... [ More ]

Reply #32

Mr-B 216 — Mon, 14 Jun 2021 23:26:28 GMT

Don't you think mathematicians with much more knowledge than you would be using math probability to win lotteries if it were possible? I don't see any of them crying foul on the lotteries. Why is that Stat$?

As usual, Stat$ avoids answering one simple question question. Talk about dodging....

Reply #31

Stat$talker — Mon, 14 Jun 2021 23:16:22 GMT

You simply have no idea what you are doing, much less have any idea how math probability works in relation to random events.

I think it is YOU that doesn't know what you're doing, no idea of how Probability Math works..because if you did?, you'd see the same thing I see..and for someone who's posted ooh so many posts ago, that you were done with ME,.. I'd say that you aren't trying Hard enough..AT LEAST NOT FOR ME..!!

I really don't give a rats booty whether you or ANYONELSE don't believe... [ More ]

Reply #30

dr san — Mon, 14 Jun 2021 22:35:38 GMT

hello Mr-B- 216 maybe all together, frequencies, statistics filters etc, but in what proportion?

to be able to play the rhythms of the raffle music

we need to see the percentages for each and see the fingerprints of the draws

Reply #29

Mr-B 216 — Mon, 14 Jun 2021 22:16:32 GMT

the proof that they are rigging the results is shown in the Math ..!!

That is not proof of any cheating. Use the same math on ANY lottery and you'll get the same type of results as you get in Georgia, PB, and MM. You simply have no idea what you are doing, much less have any idea how math probability works in relation to random events. You have read a few the books on the subject, but you may have skipped over the key points.

Don't you think mathematicians with much more knowledge than yo... [ More ]

Reply #28

Stat$talker — Mon, 14 Jun 2021 21:36:20 GMT

Cmoore50..!!

That's Ohio...they may be on the up up..but I can speak for Georgia...and I've already said the Math shows it..!!

If Ohio doesn't need or require 15 min to an hr between cutoff time and the drawing...then why the hell does Georgia?, or PB, MM?...

Answer:.. In order to rig it... What other purpose can the extra time required be for?...it gives their Mainframe enough time to sweep through ALL tickets submitted..then use their LCSF software embedded in its programming..and of... [ More ]

Reply #27

Cmoore50 — Mon, 14 Jun 2021 20:20:23 GMT

The Rolling Cash Five drawing is at 7:05pm. I can buy tickets up to 7pm. Do you really think , never mind. Plus it's a ball machine drawing, that's shown to everyone. I watch it every night. I don't think any shenanigans are going on. How does Probability Math prove that they're cheating. True odds for the rolling cash five is 1 in 575,757. The jackpot starts at 100k. And if you think some shady sh_ _ is going on. Why play

Reply #26

Stat$talker — Mon, 14 Jun 2021 19:06:36 GMT

Mayte..

That's not War Talk... It's simply Reaal Tawlk..!! as it's not Personal...

I confront Whomever or Whatever confronts ME..!! because that's what Men do..! We often clash on Philosophical ideas from time to time..but still are able to share Cyber Beers later..

Citing Astronomical Odds as an only means of defense of a Finite condition, when Probability Math (not 4th Grade Math, but Advanced Calculus) has proven that its Infinite properties has and will always conquer anything finit... [ More ]

Reply #25

Mayte — Mon, 14 Jun 2021 17:49:45 GMT

Come on friends, let's not fight each other, we are here to give positive ideas on how to win the lottery, and indeed if it is possible that those of the lottery machine choose any of the combinations that some player did not enter, but as you ever hear, make them The lottery machine choose your numbers, do not try to choose the numbers that the lottery machine will draw, that is, in my opinion if we use brute force and make a wheel of the 10 or 20 best lottery numbers We would be somehow forcin... [ More ]

Reply #24

Stat$talker — Mon, 14 Jun 2021 17:06:33 GMT

Insisting that lotteries use software to cheat us is just plain ridiculous. You have no proof that any lottery is using any such software. Lotteries don't need to cheat in order to assure they don't lose. Anyone with at least a 4th grade education can use everyday math to see how that is true.

Its pretty obvious that the Lotteries HAVE to cheat, because Probability Math proves that they ARE cheating, it explains their reason for the 15min -1 hr between cutoff time , then the draw..!!

So m... [ More ]

Reply #23

Mr-B 216 — Mon, 14 Jun 2021 12:53:46 GMT

Insisting that lotteries use software to cheat us is just plain ridiculous. You have no proof that any lottery is using any such software. Lotteries don't need to cheat in order to assure they don't lose. Anyone with at least a 4th grade education can use everyday math to see how that is true.

Hint: odds vs payout.

What I find even more ridiculous is the people, such as you Stat$, who cry foul on the so called cheating lotteries....and yet those people continue to freely and happily give t... [ More ]

Reply #22

Stat$talker — Mon, 14 Jun 2021 06:17:15 GMT

There's also a certain member here with NO BALLS or MEMORY, in that he can't seem to remember that the Patent of the very software that Lotteries use to (CHEAT) ensure that THEY don't LOSE has been posted here on LP..!!..pointed out by several OTHER members here, NOT including the member he's referring to..

But since HE'S stuck in his Texas 2 Step Alzheimer's mentality, he may never leave the Romper Room Research PaRtY..!!

-Stat$talker

Reply #21

rcbbuckeye — Sun, 13 Jun 2021 23:58:31 GMT

The balls have no memory .

That is 100% fact.

However, there are some here (not me) who really believe the lotteries examine the numbers on tickets that have been purchased to determine what numbers need to be drawn so they don't win.

Really.

Reply #20

Mayte — Sun, 13 Jun 2021 20:42:51 GMT

The statistics and the frequency are the worst lottery trick I know, since the numbers are cold, the balls have no memory, and if someone has won based on the statistics and frequency it was by sheer luck, because once there is won was a coincidence, but I doubt that I was lucky to win a good prize two or three more times, in my experience it is what I have seen, greetings. ....

Reply #19

Stat$talker — Sun, 13 Jun 2021 18:08:00 GMT

Only in certain extreme conditions might a QP payoff.., like if a jackpot is around 1 Billion or so.. everybody and their dog is buying tickets..THEN maybe a QP might payoff, but ordinarily QPs don't give you Diddley Squat..!! especially here in Georgia...

Naah, you don't need a DEGREE to know THAT..

Reply #18

Lottomeister — Sun, 13 Jun 2021 17:49:14 GMT

Better modeling? Better results? LOL Their pizza is the worst! Too bad he never got better ingredients or sauce or anything else.

Reply #17

dr san — Sun, 13 Jun 2021 12:16:56 GMT

we have to create tools to analyze grouped, (sectors) with statistics within the grid (lottery matrix) in the Cartezian, and predict near the mean and adjacent ones in addition to the reference number

Reply #16

FORTUNA915 — Sun, 13 Jun 2021 08:23:28 GMT

The Mega and Powerball are date based with floating patterns. The way the deck gets shuffled each draw goes 11 to 12 draws back but used congruently with same day calculations. The authors of the lotto combined prophecy with math because 11 plus 12 equals 23 and all you need is a 10 or straight winning ticket which equals 33 the estimated age of Jesus crucifixion. I feel every draw is special based on these back and fourth calculations to bless someone who keeps the faith that big things can hap... [ More ]

Reply #15

Stat$talker — Fri, 11 Jun 2021 21:49:49 GMT

Better modeling, Better Results

Reply #14

Speler — Fri, 11 Jun 2021 21:38:22 GMT

A quickpick for $1 can be enough. You don't even need a device or degree for that.

Reply #13

jimjwright — Fri, 11 Jun 2021 21:16:37 GMT

Papa John's used to drive Pizza Hut batty with their motto Better ingredients, Better Pizza so I will say

Better modeling, Better Results

Reply #12

Speler — Fri, 11 Jun 2021 15:54:07 GMT

Patterns are the worst lottery trick that I know.

Reply #11

dr san — Fri, 11 Jun 2021 14:51:11 GMT

hello paul762

(1) Mathematics is the language of nature.

(2) Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers.

(3) If you graph the numbers of any system, patterns emerge. Therefore, there are patterns, everywhere in nature.

Reply #10

paul762 — Fri, 11 Jun 2021 14:30:57 GMT

Everything's Mathematical...The Universe is the the very expression of the existence of Math..

Reply #9

Stat$talker — Fri, 11 Jun 2021 14:25:13 GMT

Speler?...

Everything's Mathematical...The Universe is the the very expression of the existence of Math..!!

$20.+$5.=$25. to spend on a Lottery...just as

$25.-$25.=$0. money to spend on a Lottery..same goes for Willpower... 10%, 20%, 100%... and what good is Willpower with a calculated 0 balance in one's wallet, purse, Bank account?...

There's NO GETTING AWAY FROM MATH..!!

Be careful not to miss the Forest, for starring at the Trees...!!

-Stat$talker

Reply #8

Speler — Fri, 11 Jun 2021 13:13:02 GMT

Something that is not mathematics. Money to play. Willpower to play. ...

Reply #7

db101 — Thu, 10 Jun 2021 23:45:41 GMT

Reply #6

MADDOG10 — Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:30:56 GMT

L*U*C*K

Reply #5

Stat$talker — Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:27:58 GMT

Yea, Cmoore50?

We ALL go a lil BaNaNaS at timez...!! and you certainly have a scents of a peel about you..!!

It's debatable as to whether I've been wrong, cause I'm being dodged..

Reply #4

dr san — Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:05:40 GMT

ok stat correct, is that we have people, that when the price of bets increases, they think that, they think it was more difficult to get it right, that is, they think that if they have a large number of bets they will get it right. but the quality of the study and filters shows that it doesn't take many bets to surround the winner.

Reply #3

Cmoore50 — Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:05:07 GMT

But you've been wrong countless times.

Reply #2

Stat$talker — Thu, 10 Jun 2021 14:34:23 GMT

There is but 1 Math, that derives THE most viable number of bets, which comes from the true understanding of Statistics, which IS the ultimate filter...!!

PROBABILITY MATH

and it hasn't been wrong YET...

Reply #1

rcbbuckeye — Thu, 10 Jun 2021 14:11:10 GMT

Lots of Luck

what helps to win a lottery? lots of bets and quality in math, statistics and filters studies

dr san — Thu, 10 Jun 2021 13:52:57 GMT

what helps to win a lottery? lots of bets and quality in math, statistics and filters studies