Very interesting article

Reply #13

Stat$talker — Wed, 21 Jan 2026 02:11:49 GMT

You really need your own sub-forum

Well said TB,

Ole Stat$ izz AlReAdY in a Class to myself.. ..

Whut YOU 2 can do to garner a lil clout,.. izz to cause YO local Lottery Game to git DIZCONTINUED. cauze of YO Mathematical skillz Oooh, dat'z riiight, YOU don't got ANY...!!

9/3/21

Not to mention any utha thangz of astonishing featz I've done...But, It'z good to know I git unda ya skin..

.

I cain't stand it,..cain't stand ya love

( - James Brown )

-S... [ More ]

Reply #12

LottoBux — Tue, 20 Jan 2026 14:58:59 GMT

Well said TB,

You tell em, It's a no win situation for you.

Sorry for the emoticon though, lol

Reply #11

Tucker Black — Tue, 20 Jan 2026 05:59:43 GMT

Probability, chance and odds all mean the same thing.

You really need your own sub-forum where you can spout your nonsense instead of polluting the normal forums.

Reply #10

Stat$talker — Tue, 20 Jan 2026 04:59:11 GMT

Probability

Forward looking: the chance an event will occur

pRoBaBiLiTiEz chance ain't the same thangz ...

Chancez Oddz are the same thangz...

Ole Stat$ respectz yo gallant effortz, howeevaah ... Ya mixxin up Clinical definitionz...

Ya still wRoNg

Reply #9

Blackapple — Sun, 18 Jan 2026 23:06:37 GMT

Probability

Forward looking: the chance an event will occur given a model or parameter value.

Example: If a coin is fair, the probability of heads is 0.5.

You assume the model is correct and ask:

What outcomes should I expect?

Likelihood

Backward looking: how well a parameter value explains the data you already observed.

Example: If you flip a coin 10 times and get 9 heads, the likelihood that the coin is fair is low.

You assume the data is fixed an... [ More ]

Reply #8

Stat$talker — Fri, 09 Jan 2026 17:20:04 GMT

I only posted a list because you and Lotterologist wouldn't stop bugging me about it.

Xscusez, Xscusez, Xscusez...!!

You're just wRoNg in ANY Forum

Reply #7

Tucker Black — Fri, 09 Jan 2026 15:15:01 GMT

I haven't even checked my list, because it's pointless as I did not buy one ticket.

I only posted a list because you and Lotterologist wouldn't stop bugging me about it. I stated that publishing a list for pick 3 is pointless, so I finally just did the same myself.

It is extremely unlikely that if you buy over a hundred pick 3 tickets, twice a day, for weeks on end, you will not lose . I looked up his California numbers one time, and sure enough, his list was a loser.

Either you're g... [ More ]

Reply #6

Stat$talker — Fri, 09 Jan 2026 01:19:14 GMT

I prefer to use the term likelihood rather than probability

That'z like sayin. Car , az opposed to Automobile .

They mean the same thangz..

SOMEBODY help'im

Reply #5

Stat$talker — Fri, 09 Jan 2026 00:27:08 GMT

Any system that depends on the outcome of prior drawings, for a game in which the drawings are independent, is useless .

Aaaaand there ya have it ..str8 from his ooown fingertips.... He'z sayin Probability izz in fact creditable ...cauze it duzzn't depend on prior drawingz /outcomez...and the Math confirmz it...

That'z why hiz list of Colorado Pick3 z ain't hit nutin

Reply #4

Tucker Black — Thu, 08 Jan 2026 17:11:18 GMT

The article discusses the usage of a probability concept towards complex things, like science or life events. I prefer to use the term likelihood rather than probability in those cases.

A lottery drawing is so incredibly simple, there is no question that the probability of an outcome can be calculated precisely.

Even for more complex games, such as blackjack, the house edge can be calculated exactly, but only for the first hand of the deck. To estimate the house edge for the average hand... [ More ]

Reply #3

Stat$talker — Thu, 08 Jan 2026 11:12:35 GMT

Probability Probably Doesn't Exist

Once upon a Time , Esteemed Scholarz Published bookz insinuating the World wuz flat ..

Thiz article izz most likely no different...

The fact that LOz reprogrammed their Lottery Mainframe since Ole Stat$ dizscovered itz true werkingz, izz ALL THE PROOF one needs, to be convinced that it duzz xzist...

-Stat$talker

Reply #2

AIM9 — Wed, 07 Jan 2026 21:45:43 GMT

After a certain number numbers become irrelevant to humans

Reply #1

Coin Toss — Wed, 07 Jan 2026 21:37:22 GMT

This is a very interesting article that takes a very deep look at probability. You'll have to read it for yourself and see what you get out of it, the author is emeritus professor of statistics at Cambridge. He is the author of The Art of Uncertainty and How to Navigate Chance, Ignorance, Risk and Luck (Penguin, 2024). My comment, does this wave good bye to a lot of lottery systems and theories

Very interesting article

Coin Toss — Wed, 07 Jan 2026 21:29:56 GMT

Scientific American Special Edition, Ultimate Math. Page 28, Probability Probably Doesn't Exist.........All of statistics and much of science depend on probability - an astonishing achievement, considering no one's really sure what it is. By David Spieghalter.