<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Which do you think works better?</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/58296</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/58296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Which do you think works better?</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Which do you think works better?</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/58296</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/58296</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2002 03:05:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Which method do you figure would work out better over time. A: Randomly picking a set of 18 numbers, wheeling them and playing the combinations for the next 8 draws. or B: Randomlypicking a new set of 18 numbers for each draw and wheeling them? I know it is supposed to be identical. I am wonderingif the non changing block might get around the bad luck ofnew numbers never being right? Anyone ever try this for real</p>]]></description>
			<category>Guest</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

