Gail Howard's Software

Reply #19

Andrew — Mon, 17 Feb 2003 14:00:38 GMT

Well said Wiz! I couldn't agree more...Andrew

Reply #18

Lottowiz34 — Sun, 16 Feb 2003 20:50:48 GMT

All systems work,Quick-Picks,Number Wheels and Lottery Systems, QP's work basically because so many people use them over any other method so of course your going too have more winners from quick-picks,Lottery Wheels work only if your good at selecting the numbers that are placed in the wheels if you SUCK at picking numbers of course your wheel isn't going too work but if your an EXCELLENT number picker then you should win prizes on a regular basis based on your number selection.The prizes will... [ More ]

Reply #17

Greg — Sat, 15 Feb 2003 16:02:39 GMT

Hi Andrew,Thanks for your support! I appreciate it! I will try to download WinHunter later today.Greg

Reply #16

Lottery_Analyst — Fri, 14 Feb 2003 19:24:50 GMT

Andrew,Thanks for your answers and explanations. It sounds very exciting. PLEASE keep me posted of any new developments or successes you have with it. I might try it myself One Day soon, but all my time is tied up right now with work, family and developing my own system. Maybe we can compare notes one day. Thanks again...Lottery Analyst

Reply #15

Thomas Covenant — Fri, 14 Feb 2003 19:10:05 GMT

I'm downloading it now Andrew. I'll be glad to give you regular feedback. I'll use it for 6 months.

Reply #14

Andrew — Fri, 14 Feb 2003 18:31:29 GMT

1> I am the sole creator of the system, I developed this software because I wanted a tool that had features no other software had.2> My system has not been in use very long by users who have been working with it. It is a very complex system, and requires alot of time to setup and design the filter structures for a single lottery. You asked what has it won? To date, I have not been informed of a single successful prediction. Why is that? The software was just released as a BETA version. U... [ More ]

Reply #13

Andrew — Fri, 14 Feb 2003 16:20:15 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Greg on February 13, 2003 It really comes down to this: the wise lotto player is one who is armed with assorted and varied strategies, tips, and techniques and has studied closely the lottery history of the specific lotto being played. Analysis and not wheeling, is the key. GregActually Greg, I think it will end up being a combination of both. The key idea is that you lok at a lottery game as a closed system of variables, much like a complex equation. The output w... [ More ]

Reply #12

CASH Only — Fri, 14 Feb 2003 01:03:31 GMT

Player: Guess what!! The Brooklyn ticket that hit for $128 million Tuesday night is for LUMP SUM

Reply #11

Annuityok — Fri, 14 Feb 2003 00:38:28 GMT

There are a lot of ways to reduce the odds of lottery. Anyone who have taken statistics and mathmatics courses in college can easily figure out and learn those principle and formulas. The key is the odds is still so large that it doesn't help much.Gail Howard just wrote those books to summarize some simple principles in statistics. There is no big deal. She exaggerated her ability too much, and she charges too much for those books. IMO

Reply #10

Greg — Fri, 14 Feb 2003 00:19:58 GMT

To all above I would only say this: for those that understand, no explanation (or documentation for that matter) is needed. For those who doubt and/or do not understand, no explanation is possible or convincing.

Reply #9

Greg — Fri, 14 Feb 2003 00:14:19 GMT

I don't think 74 winners in 20 years who have won cumulatively $97 million dollars is random chance .

Reply #8

Thomas Covenant — Thu, 13 Feb 2003 20:26:28 GMT

More people win by using quick picks than GH's systems. One recent player won $172 million(cash option)using quick picks. That one player alone is almost double the total money GH's players have won. Her systems have been around for 20 years. Random chance could easily account for a few winners in a 20 year time period.

Reply #7

Greg — Thu, 13 Feb 2003 19:30:58 GMT

Hi Lottery Analyst,1- At the risk of pushing or selling GH's software, which I am not, she states that 74 people using her system (assorted strategies) have won a total of $97 million dollars and she has documentation for each winner for skeptics. I consider THAT backing up . No, I don't know her and I don't work for her. What other developer can back and document their claims with winners as she can? 2- Why won't you take a stand as I did on the aforementioned authors/books? I find t... [ More ]

Reply #6

Greg — Thu, 13 Feb 2003 16:39:29 GMT

Hey BfloTG and others,You didn't read closely. I didn't mention wheels at all. I am referring to CHARTS specific to her program that guide in number selection. Wheeling is a whole different topic. Chart#4 is one example. I am interested in which charts users of her software favor so I can discuss strategy with another user.As far as I'm concerned, Gail Howard's website and books on lottery strategies, techniques and tips are the best I've ever seen anywhere with the possible exception of Lo... [ More ]

Reply #5

CASH Only — Thu, 13 Feb 2003 15:28:19 GMT

TG: The problem with Lotto 59 is NOT the odds, but the terrible 40% prize return, which explains why three numbers pays $1 and four numbers has won only $13. Take Five's prize pool _is_ 50% of sales. If you haven't done so, now is a good time to stop playing Lotto 59.

Reply #4

BfloTG — Thu, 13 Feb 2003 15:11:29 GMT

Cash, yes I used to read Lottery New$ on occasion. It was an interesting magazine. I had moved to Illinois for a couple of years and when I came back to NY the paper was gone.Yes the Take 5 (5/39) game has much better odds than Lotto (6/59). Odds of 575,000:1 vs 22,000,000:1. To win the lotto is like winning Take 5 38 times. The smaller prizes have better odds as well. To win around $20-$30, Take 5 odds of 103:1 are a lot better than Lotto's 1070:1.

Reply #3

Andrew — Thu, 13 Feb 2003 14:58:11 GMT

That is the problem with wheels. You have to pick the RIGHT numbers to wheel first, and then the wheel cna only guarantee a certain prize level hit if you match so many numbes out of your pool.This is where WINHunter comes in. WINHunter is an attempt to eliminate as many numbers as possible from each draw using designable filter structures. NO other lottery software allows you the flexability that WINHunter does with Filters.Also, WINHunter can show you how well your filter design performed o... [ More ]

Reply #2

CASH Only — Thu, 13 Feb 2003 14:58:07 GMT

BfloTG: Do you remember Lottery New$ ? I delivered it to stores in downstate NY April 1993 until it folded in December 2001. You knew Take Five is a much better game than Lotto 59.

Reply #1

BfloTG — Thu, 13 Feb 2003 14:52:58 GMT

GregI along with a number of co-workers tried the Gail Howard wheeling system back in 1997. Then we had choices of playing 8 and 29 combinations for NY's Take 5 game also 15 and 42 combinations for the 6/54 Lotto. You wheel 14 or 18 selected numbers. We were spending about $25 almost every day and did that for several months. We won 4 out of 5 twice in the Take 5, and nothing more than a $30 or so prize in the Lotto. I think we did just as good winning with the Free Play tickets we won from... [ More ]

Gail Howard's Software

Greg — Thu, 13 Feb 2003 12:49:36 GMT

Hi,I'd be interested in corresponding with anyone who uses any of GH's charts (from her software) to compare notes and strategies. Thanks.GregVigreto@aol.com