Do lottery systems really work?

Reply #249

lottoking — Sun, 19 Oct 2003 10:14:09 GMT

A good lottery system is a good slave but a bad master.Time will reveal all the myths

Reply #248

lottoking — Sun, 19 Oct 2003 10:13:55 GMT

A good lottery system is a good slave but a bad master.Time will receal all the myths

Reply #247

CASH Only — Mon, 29 Sep 2003 12:14:46 GMT

Up to 126 votes-almost one per CA recall ballot.

Reply #246

Pick-4_Master — Mon, 08 Sep 2003 21:01:07 GMT

Whether you believe in Luck or not Quick-Picks are LUCK based in theory.And since I don't believe in Luck I don't play them but I do believe in creating my own Destiny so I select my own numbers.

Reply #245

kbcherokee — Mon, 08 Sep 2003 20:34:06 GMT

Visiondude:I know my friend... You know I'm kidding you about your one QP. Time will tell who he chooses to win the BIG one first, or if it's even in the Script.-Good luck my friend-Chief - SYSTEM = I'm just watering my seeds ahead of time, getting ready for my Harvest when all is ready.

Reply #244

Teufellj — Mon, 08 Sep 2003 10:01:27 GMT

RJOH,you are right in both cases! However, when a person uses the States funds (and not like Kest) things take on a new parameter and usage! I am sure that a veteran player like yourself, knows when to hold 'em and when not to play 'em and if you think that you are going to be in the black, you play them the way that you see them! I have for many years played very frugal because in times past I just couldn't justify more than three dollars once in a while for a box play in the pick 3 lottery. M... [ More ]

Reply #243

RJOh — Mon, 08 Sep 2003 01:08:25 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Teufellj on September 07, 2003 My fellow gamblers:SYSTEMS DO WORK! a SIMPLE WORKABLE CREATION That does not take much imagination and is low cost or can be used to blow your weekly paycheck........ I, myself, don't play more than $16.00 a day........!Teufellj$16/day=$96/wk to play pick3 for up to a $500 prize and I thought $20-$80/wk. to play the the jackpot games for $10M-$200M+ was a lot of money.RJOh

Reply #242

Teufellj — Sun, 07 Sep 2003 02:10:32 GMT

My fellow gamblers:SYSTEMS DO WORK! a SIMPLE WORKABLE CREATION That does not take much imagination and is low cost or can be used to blow your weekly paycheck. Check out the full weekly plays in the Ohio forum here at the post~Ohio pick 3~you will see what I am talking about. Two of us started out using a very simple idea which does work and the rest of us work together as a team of sorts. I, myself, don't play more than $16.00 a day or less and do win quite handly. This proof is in our forum. T... [ More ]

Reply #241

visiondude — Sun, 07 Sep 2003 01:32:01 GMT

Quote: O

Reply #240

hypersoniq — Sat, 06 Sep 2003 18:49:25 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by WILLSELL on September 05, 2003 pick a number and play it 5 times straight and boxed until it comes out. Cost: 360 x 5.00per day = 1800.00If it comes out and pays 2000.00 x 5 = 10,000.00net profit: 8,200.00Not bad eh?using PA lottery figures...on $5 a day...cost... ($5 x 365) $1,825a hit... straight ($2.50 wins $1500... it's 500:1) + boxed ($2.50 wins $200 ... it's 80:1) = $1700 ... just boxed = $200((( Based on 3... [ More ]

Reply #239

kbcherokee — Sat, 06 Sep 2003 18:31:14 GMT

Vision, Vision,Vision...QP = Luck...System = Reducuing the amount of luck by increasing your leverage with a system...= More $, more often...Chief - Wisdom is the wealth of the wise.

Reply #238

visiondude — Sat, 06 Sep 2003 00:48:50 GMT

maybe stupid wasn't stupi

Reply #237

RJOh — Fri, 05 Sep 2003 15:20:43 GMT

Are you saying the different between beaning Stupid and an Idiot is knowledge?RJOh

Reply #236

WILLSELL — Fri, 05 Sep 2003 15:13:05 GMT

I agree with the simple approach...beyond that a lot of it depends on decisions made by the individual. The key to winning in any gambling system is to increase your leverage based on knowledge and a system. Lottery programs do that...some better than others. Here is a simple system.....pick a number and play it 5 times straight and boxed until it comes out. Cost: 360 x 5.00per day = 1800.00If it comes out and pays 2000.00 x 5 = 10,000.00net profit

Reply #235

RJOh — Wed, 03 Sep 2003 23:07:08 GMT

The best way to prove a simple lottery program can win a lottery is:1.WIN A LOTTERY USING A SIMPLE PROGRAMyou only need to generate one winning combination and play it!RJOh

Reply #234

MrSteel01 — Wed, 03 Sep 2003 17:34:50 GMT

I said this a hundred 1 timed already!Any simple lottery program could win if it had just a frew simple basic items!1 NUMBERS/DRAWINGS 1,000 MIN2 SEQUENCIAL ORDER PREFRENCE3 SUMS4 GROUPS5 REPEATING SETSyou don't need much more other than a number generator

Reply #233

MrSteel01 — Mon, 25 Aug 2003 12:19:28 GMT

In Ohio 1/49 the sums have not change in 12 years!53 low/253 highSo any above is most likely not to be. Nor has any six digit reapeated! Most people play the same number over again or qp's, that's why jackpots get high! st

Reply #232

Pick-4_Master — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 02:39:41 GMT

Your absolutely RIGHT handicapping the game in order to increase your chances of winning without having to rely totally on LUCK.

Reply #231

WILLSELL — Sat, 02 Aug 2003 00:41:03 GMT

Some of you are missing the whole point of gambling. The key is to reduce the amount of luck by increasing your leverage. That is what systems do.

Reply #230

Thomas Covenant — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 21:09:18 GMT

If I actually did win, I could

Reply #229

fja — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 19:23:31 GMT

wonder how much i could get for my excel spread sheet if I won?$1.95 (no backs

Reply #228

visiondude — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 15:42:25 GMT

you should get at

Reply #227

Thomas Covenant — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 13:25:40 GMT

If you won once, I don't think they would question you. If you won several times, they probably would. Of course, if I had a system that could predict lottery drawings, do you really think I would sell it over the internet for $19.95? Do you think anybody would

Reply #226

fja — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 13:05:26 GMT

I understand that but if you won the lottery (and i know it would be by luck) and said that you used gail howards system to help you.....do you think they would question you.

Reply #225

rundown99 — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 11:12:13 GMT

See the signature below .....

Reply #224

fja — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:12:43 GMT

I have seen stories of winners using there numbers, but is there any recorded winners that claim a system assisted them. And if they did do you think that the lottery commision would launch an investigation.

Reply #223

RJOh — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:23:45 GMT

In order for the states to make money and create large jackpots to attract players, lotteries have to have lots of losers. No system is going to change that fact, but with mult-million dollars jackpots, a system only have to win a jackpot once to be a winner.RJOh

Reply #222

WILLSELL — Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:29:54 GMT

I have read all your posts

Reply #221

emilyg — Sun, 27 Jul 2003 23:45:15 GMT

cash only - what was mr z in the news for

Reply #220

CASH Only — Sun, 27 Jul 2003 23:25:33 GMT

Mr Z was in Lottery New$ also.

Reply #219

Pick-4_Master — Mon, 07 Jul 2003 02:28:49 GMT

MR.Z is alive and kicking I visit his site regularly

Reply #218

Greg — Mon, 07 Jul 2003 00:56:43 GMT

Do lottery systems really work?I think the answer lies in how YOU define the word, work . If a system improves your odds by avoiding what is not probable, does it work ? I think so. Work can't always mean win .

Reply #217

CASH Only — Sun, 06 Jul 2003 21:20:40 GMT

Up to 102 votes...

Reply #216

CASH Only — Sat, 28 Jun 2003 22:50:16 GMT

Do any of you remember a Mr Z who did much the same thing as Gail Howard

Reply #215

CASH Only — Mon, 23 Jun 2003 22:50:20 GMT

RJ: Quick Draw lottery agents have DO-IT-YOURSELF ticket checkers, so the agent can concentrate on selling tickets.

Reply #214

RJOh — Mon, 23 Jun 2003 15:14:29 GMT

What's new about checking your tickets at the terminals? Any store clerk will check your tickets for winners, although I prefer to check my own.RJOh

Reply #213

CASH Only — Mon, 23 Jun 2003 05:51:18 GMT

NY has ticket checkers for its on-line games now, although you probably have to visit a Quick Draw location to use one.

Reply #212

hypersoniq — Sat, 21 Jun 2003 18:07:04 GMT

I don't think that any

Reply #211

CASH Only — Sat, 21 Jun 2003 12:47:18 GMT

100 votes on a topic-probably a Lottery Post first...

Reply #210

visiondude — Fri, 20 Jun 2003 19:23:57 GMT

vision

Reply #209

midwstrngirl — Fri, 20 Jun 2003 15:23:44 GMT

VisionDue: nb

Reply #208

visiondude — Fri, 20 Jun 2003 13:37:15 GMT

midwestrngirl,if y

Reply #207

midwstrngirl — Fri, 20 Jun 2003 13:04:14 GMT

Thanks Cash Only, I ha

Reply #206

CASH Only — Fri, 20 Jun 2003 10:07:29 GMT

MWgirl:You might want to try Gail Howard's systems-she was a columnist in Lottery New$ .

Reply #205

midwstrngirl — Tue, 17 Jun 2003 17:08:59 GMT

i hope it isn't contag

Reply #204

Andrew — Tue, 17 Jun 2003 12:18:06 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by midwstrngirl on June 13, 2003 i am so sick of being one number off!last week i had 10-14-29-38-40 for MMThat is called Oneoffitis ... Andrew

Reply #203

RJOh — Fri, 13 Jun 2003 19:08:30 GMT

With Megamillions possible 135,145,920 combinations, if you eliminate 131,983,614 losing combinations, you will be left with (3,162,306) winning combinations, 1,533,939 of them worth $2. That a lot to ask of any system. Even if the system eliminates 100,000,000 losing combinations and improve your odds to 1:35,145,920 you still have 31,983,614 losing combinations you can chose. Good luck with your system what ever you use.RJOh

Reply #202

midwstrngirl — Fri, 13 Jun 2003 14:40:27 GMT

How about you buy a few QP's, then wheel the QP numbers with some of your own numbers the reason being QP's usually produce one number on each ticket but not together (LOL) i actually heard of a lottery pool that did this and won the jackpotorafter you buy say 3 QP's, buy the same number of tickets with one number off for each ticket (LOL) i am so sick of being one number off!last week i had 10-14-29-38-40 for MM

Reply #201

rundown99 — Wed, 11 Jun 2003 21:22:23 GMT

On second thought, I'm just going to let the numbers pick me. If I am going to win it, I will. If not, then I won't. The lottery is so random that unless you are playing numbers that you will stick will all the way, you might as well just buy quick picks.

Reply #200

rundown99 — Thu, 05 Jun 2003 22:34:04 GMT

Thinking about it some more and after only winning $3 after purchasing 29 quick picks on Wednesday night, I am going to play some tickets using my numbers and some tickets using quick picks.

Reply #199

visiondude — Tue, 03 Jun 2003 01:16:16 GMT

secret,when i buy my one little quick pick i switch between 3 different stores depending on my ability to drive to each one (which is closer, etc). i ONLY target mom and pop small non corporation stores (shell, BP, etc.) that are out of my town.(1) for my anonymity and (2) if i won, i would love to see someone who could really use the business/notoriety and money that comes from selling a winning ticket. looking out for the little guy who really needs it and would appreciate it. i have to driv... [ More ]

Reply #198

rundown99 — Mon, 02 Jun 2003 17:05:27 GMT

My ass

Reply #197

Lottowiz34 — Thu, 29 May 2003 23:05:25 GMT

Well so far you have proven what I have been saying all along that selecting your own numbers using a number strategy or system can increase your chances in Lottery games and depending on your Skill level they can do a lot better than Quick-Picks.Even if you don't obtain the amount of money won or more like you did with the $100 won by a quick-pick doesn't disprove systems or strategies or whether they are a better choice for playing Lottery games.I've never said they were better just that they... [ More ]

Reply #196

rundown99 — Thu, 29 May 2003 22:26:48 GMT

I won $39 (I matched the red ball 16 on 10 plays last night, and I picked 17 as the white ball on some of those plays). I've bought tickets before using strategy, so I am not new to the lottery strategy deal. However, I matched the red ball on the last 4 Powerball drawings (4 on May 17, 9 on May 21, 42 on May 24, and 16 last night on May 28) so I am on a HOT streak. I play several plays using various red balls that don't show up very often (Last night was the first time in at least a year th... [ More ]

Reply #195

Lottowiz34 — Wed, 28 May 2003 12:22:46 GMT

Also I think you might want too double check your information about most winners being quick-pick users from what MIDWSTRNGRL says most tickets sold are quick-picks but the majority of Jackpots won are from players that select there own numbers not quick-picksher post about this is somewhere in here.

Reply #194

Lottowiz34 — Wed, 28 May 2003 12:15:31 GMT

I applaud your desire too test the performance of number strategy versus quick-picks but there's one thing your forgetting and that is number strategies are only as good as the player using them.If you've never used them before then your skill level will be very low and probably won't produce any promising results.Now if your just selecting your own numbers at random or using ages,birthdays and anniversary numbers which is referred too as Lucky Numbers than your not using real number strategy... [ More ]

Reply #193

rundown99 — Wed, 28 May 2003 11:39:54 GMT

Now that I think about it......Most people win using quick picks, but there have been others who have won using birthdays and anniversaries. One Powerball winner from Indiana said earlier this year that he always picks his own numbers. He said that he sees a lot of high numbers and a lot of low numbers, and he goes from there. Bearing that in mind, I have been trying out something. I still play some quick picks, but for a while, I have also bought tickets playing numbers based on strategy... [ More ]

Reply #192

Lottowiz34 — Tue, 27 May 2003 18:52:54 GMT

I really don't understand what you mean? obviously you misunderstood my comment.I never said you can't or won't win from your little quick-picks what I meant was your suppose too have VISION which means you should be able too see that anything is possible even someone beating the RANDOM ODDS of the Lottery using a system or strategy but you seem too think it's only possible from your method of quick-picks so that's why I said you only see what you want and are BLIND too other possibilities that... [ More ]

Reply #191

visiondude — Tue, 27 May 2003 18:39:28 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Lottowiz34 on May 27, 2003Sorry you feel that way VisionDude,your name implies you can see things that other people can't but it seems too me like your no different than the other people.Your VISION only sees what you want it too see which makes you BLIND too everything else.I knew you and Dowjones were PARTNERS in CRIME!!!feel what way? you will have to wait and see if i have vision (category #2). put it this way, you are in the majority. i have had many people... [ More ]

Reply #190

Lottowiz34 — Tue, 27 May 2003 11:49:25 GMT

DowJones,I believe my message was directed towards VISIONDUDE I only used your name as a reference to my implied statement.So I don't know what your talking about and as for MIDWSTRNGRL she's just making comments not stirring up trouble all of her posts have made sense unlike other messages posted hererecently and in the past.

Reply #189

dowjones — Tue, 27 May 2003 04:38:35 GMT

Quote: I knew you and Dowjones were PARTNERS in CRIME!!!Lottowhiz,What crime is there in expressing an opinion, unless one tries to stir up a hornet's nest like what midwstrngrl is trying to do?Did we not BOTH agree to both lay down our arms?I suggest dat we both do not fall prey to midwstrngrl's nefarious schemes!Altho' I must say that I find midwstrngrl's thinly veiled insults to be more amusing than insulting.Ha Ha....

Reply #188

Lottowiz34 — Tue, 27 May 2003 03:50:47 GMT

Sorry you feel that way VisionDude,your name implies you can see things that other people can't but it seems too me like your no different than the other people.Your VISION only sees what you want it too see which makes you BLIND too everything else.I knew you and Dowjones were PARTNERS in CRIME

Reply #187

dowjones — Tue, 27 May 2003 03:17:38 GMT

Quote

Reply #186

visiondude — Tue, 27 May 2003 02:23:25 GMT

dowjones,a ra

Reply #185

dowjones — Tue, 27 May 2003 00:50:14 GMT

Quote

Reply #184

visiondude — Tue, 27 May 2003 00:30:20 GMT

Quote

Reply #183

dowjones — Tue, 27 May 2003 00:10:42 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by midwstrngirl on May 26, 2003lottowiz...I have decided to follow the advice of a wise friend of mine and I am passing it on to you... you should never try to teach a pig to sing...it will just frustrate you, and annoy the pig the qp'ers are being contrary for the sake of being contrary...so why bother trying to teach them anything?Yes....I agree.

Reply #182

midwstrngirl — Mon, 26 May 2003 21:20:27 GMT

lottowiz...I have decided to follow the advice of a wise friend of mine and I am passing it on to you... you should never try to teach a pig to sing...it will just frustrate you, and annoy the pig the qp'ers are being contrary for the sake of being contrary...so why bother trying to teach them anything

Reply #181

Lottowiz34 — Mon, 26 May 2003 14:00:54 GMT

I've been trying,I've decided not too engage in anymore debates or discussions with players on this Forum that have a problem with other players that use SYSTEMS it's a waste of time when they try too prove a point or disprove my point.So let's not discuss anything that contradicts(there's that word again)our gambling strategies.If you would like tips on playing the Pick-3/4 or information on software and systems feel free too contact me if not then don't.

Reply #180

Lottowiz34 — Mon, 26 May 2003 13:48:21 GMT

Reply #179

dowjones — Mon, 26 May 2003 13:38:12 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Lottowiz34 on May 26, 2003Well you said I was SORE about something so I guess I should act that way right? also you have been very SARCASTIC with your comments go back and read them or do you need me too point it out for you? And if I was angry I would have used Profanity which is considered OFFENSIVE LANGUAGE and I haven't in any of my post.I just find it a waste of time discussing such issues with players that have no real basis for there comments or statement... [ More ]

Reply #178

Lottowiz34 — Mon, 26 May 2003 13:34:52 GMT

Well you said I was SORE about something so I guess I should act that way right? also you have been very SARCASTIC with your comments go back and read them or do you need me too point it out for you? And if I was angry I would have used Profanity which is considered OFFENSIVE LANGUAGE and I haven't in any of my post.I just find it a waste of time discussing such issues with players that have no real basis for there comments or statements I never contradicted myself you just didn't fully un... [ More ]

Reply #177

dowjones — Mon, 26 May 2003 13:23:35 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Lottowiz34 on May 26, 2003I'm not sore about anything and since LUCK doesn't exist in my life I have no lack of something that I don't believe in and my gambling losses probably don't add up too what you've LOST buying QUICK-PICKS and by the way I think I proved my point about your lack of INTELLIGENCE you can't even spell the word GAMBLING (correct) it's not GABMLING (incorrect) so like I said before this conversation is OVER!!!!!It is only a small typo error..... [ More ]

Reply #176

Lottowiz34 — Mon, 26 May 2003 13:19:35 GMT

I'm not sore about anything and since LUCK doesn't exist in my life I have no lack of something that I don't believe in and my gambling losses probably don't add up too what you've LOST buying QUICK-PICKS and by the way I think I proved my point about your lack of INTELLIGENCE you can't even spell the word GAMBLING (correct) it's not GABMLING (incorrect) so like I said before this conversation is OVER

Reply #175

dowjones — Mon, 26 May 2003 13:12:22 GMT

Quote

Reply #174

Lottowiz34 — Mon, 26 May 2003 13:09:30 GMT

Also what is your point of extracting my quote? Oh, I know you need me to explain it for you well what I meant by I don't believe in luck as far as my form of gambling is concerened but I do believe luck exists in other situations is this when I PLAY the Lottery using number strategies it's SKILL I'm relying on not LUCK other players that don't use skill and buy quick-picks and play random numbers like Birthdays,ages etc... are dealing with LUCK also LUCK can play a part in other aspects of li... [ More ]

Reply #173

dowjones — Mon, 26 May 2003 13:04:10 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Lottowiz34 on May 26, 2003Okay DOWJONES let me explain myself in SIMPLER terms for you too understand because it's obvious you are having a problem intellectually.First of all I never said players don't win using Quick-Picks I KNOW THEY DOI just said it's based on LUCK because they aren't making an INTELLIGENT decision on there numbers the Lottery Terminal is randomly choosing.Therefore if they don't WIN they just weren't LUCKY that day now if they used a SYSTEM too... [ More ]

Reply #172

Lottowiz34 — Mon, 26 May 2003 13:00:46 GMT

Okay DOWJONES let me explain myself in SIMPLER terms for you too understand because it's obvious you are having a problem intellectually.First of all I never said players don't win using Quick-Picks I KNOW THEY DOI just said it's based on LUCK because they aren't making an INTELLIGENT decision on there numbers the Lottery Terminal is randomly choosing.Therefore if they don't WIN they just weren't LUCKY that day now if they used a SYSTEM too select there numbers and didn't WIN then they obvious... [ More ]

Reply #171

dowjones — Mon, 26 May 2003 05:52:14 GMT

Quote: E

Reply #170

Lottowiz34 — Sat, 24 May 2003 16:54:59 GMT

Well at least we agree on something,we both DON'T BELIEVE IN LUCK in our personal lives.

Reply #169

visiondude — Sat, 24 May 2003 14:08:42 GMT

ahhh, but luck has

Reply #168

Lottowiz34 — Sat, 24 May 2003 13:29:29 GMT

How about we put all 3 in 1 category since technically they all represent the same thing or concept regarding your way of approaching life.Lots in the Bible were used for making decisions or letting a Higher Power decide the outcome of a situation, when someone hits a jackpot they feel as if they were lucky.There are 2 forms of Gambling in Lottery Luck and Strategy your form is Luck which coincides with your belief system of Fate/Destiny.If it's your Destiny too be Lucky enough too Hit a... [ More ]

Reply #167

visiondude — Sat, 24 May 2003 12:51:16 GMT

lottowiz,fate....destiny....luck.only two of those terms are congruent. you pick which two.for many years in my life the word luck has been removed from the equation and replaced by fate/destiny. we will see.VDquick pickLS (category #2

Reply #166

Lottowiz34 — Sat, 24 May 2003 10:55:49 GMT

In your case VisionDude since you don't believe in Number picking strategies and only buy quick-picks and believe in FATE and DESTINY I would have too say that you believe in LUCK as well therefore if you WON it would be LUCK.Your were Lucky enough to be one of the million or so chances of winning with a quick-pick.

Reply #165

Lottowiz34 — Sat, 24 May 2003 10:51:24 GMT

I don't play the Pick-6 Lottery so what's your point?and I don't blame anything on the lack of luck when I don't believe in it,I said that the lack of skill or expertise in number selection when using systems is at fault not the system itself.I think you need too bang your head against the wall again so you can understand what I wrote nowhere did I mention anything about not having enough luck being the cause of anything.

Reply #164

dowjones — Sat, 24 May 2003 00:45:07 GMT

Quote

Reply #163

visiondude — Fri, 23 May 2003 23:51:18 GMT

lottowiz,if i won, would you consider it luck ?VDQPLS

Reply #162

RJOh — Fri, 23 May 2003 23:01:16 GMT

Lottowiz I think at this forum there is a group in both camp, but neither camp is big enough to have produce a winner. Hopefully someday someone will win a jackpot and will have bragging rights for how to win the lottery. I am a system player. I developed my own system base on what I wished I had done when I lost and what I did do when I won. I track my wins and losts and adjust my system accordingly. Picking my own numbers is half the fun of playing the lottery.RJOh

Reply #161

Lottowiz34 — Fri, 23 May 2003 22:23:54 GMT

Actually RJOh the big misconception about systems is that all of them SELECT NUMBERS or do all the work well that depends on the system.Certain systems do select numbers for you but the majority of them don't.They just give you information showing the most likely numbers too be drawn then the player makes the final decision.Then there's some software that will DO ALL THE WORK and select and wheel your numbers but most of them don't.The player must make the final decision in what numbers too... [ More ]

Reply #160

Lottowiz34 — Fri, 23 May 2003 22:06:20 GMT

It's only Pure Luck if you believe that it is, I personally think that people who believe it's Luck if thay WIN money in Lottery games probably don't have any other way of playing except buying quick-picks or using personal numbers they feel are Lucky .I use too play that way yrs ago and when I got tired of waiting for LUCK too strike I started using STRATEGY.Luck means you don't make an intelligent decision in your number choices using Strategies means you make an intelligent choice based on... [ More ]

Reply #159

RJOh — Fri, 23 May 2003 22:02:59 GMT

Systems shouldn't be viewed as something to believe in but rather a tool to pick numbers. Do they work? Yes. If you want to cover all the combinations of 4's in a group of numbers, a wheeling system will do that. If you want to pick numbers within certain parameters and the system is designed right it will do that. Just because a system pick numbers within the parameters you chose does not mean you are going to have a winning combinsation. If your system picked a thousand numbers to play, i... [ More ]

Reply #158

askjeeves — Fri, 23 May 2003 18:39:03 GMT

Whether you believe in systems or not, good luck to all! Personally, winning a JACKPOT lottery is pure luck.

Reply #157

Lottowiz34 — Wed, 21 May 2003 04:52:35 GMT

Oh and by the way the Gail Howard testimonials are FOR REAL I investigated them myself in 1997.And too answer your question about why these developers don't win using there own systems how do you know they haven't?Steve Player has won many times using his own systems and that's been verified by a colleaque of mine.Don't be so suspicious of everyone these people aren't trying too take anyone for a ride,the only ride they want too help you with is the ride too cashing in a WINNING TICKET... [ More ]

Reply #156

Lottowiz34 — Wed, 21 May 2003 04:46:42 GMT

Thanks,glad you SEE things more CLEARLY now,no hard feelings okay Brother

Reply #155

visiondude — Wed, 21 May 2003 02:24:11 GMT

midwstrngirl,i stand cor

Reply #154

fbird — Tue, 20 May 2003 13:01:52 GMT

Hi to all,

Reply #153

Lottowiz34 — Tue, 20 May 2003 12:01:02 GMT

Honestly VisionDude why should I care what you think youdon't pay me when I HIT the numbers the FL Lottery does!!! Gosh DUDE relax it's just a game,GOOD LUCK on your $1 Quick-Picks

Reply #152

Lottowiz34 — Tue, 20 May 2003 10:19:38 GMT

Give me a break VisionDude,your so predictable I'm just having FUN busting your CHOPS,sorry if I hurt your feelings.I can say what ever I want in here remember this is a FREEDOM OF SPEECH regulated forum as long as I don't insult anyone with profanity.So if you don't have the VISION too see whether I'm serious or not then you obviously are BLIND too the TRUTH my friend.I'm just having FUN I could care less about your beliefs or whether you think my method of playing works or not soI'll send yo... [ More ]

Reply #151

midwstrngirl — Tue, 20 May 2003 08:43:29 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by visiondude on May 20, 2003 if you would have done a little more homework on me you would have read that i have an open mind. meaning so far i have yet to see any proof that anybody can create an edge using systems to beat the odds in what i believe is a truly random game. thats one of the other reasons that i am in here. to see if someone does.Easy there VD... a little more homework just because I said I couldn't claim to have read all of your posts, doesnt mean I ha... [ More ]

Reply #150

visiondude — Tue, 20 May 2003 02:27:19 GMT

Quote