what is the best system for 3&4 digit?

Reply #35

visiondude — Mon, 28 Apr 2003 04:27:36 GMT

todd, that $100,000 b

Reply #34

Todd — Mon, 28 Apr 2003 00:42:59 GMT

A Lottery Post member won $100,000 in Powerball in Pennsylvania - here's the scan to prove it. (Posted last year.

Reply #33

Lottowiz34 — Sun, 27 Apr 2003 23:20:35 GMT

I'll prove you wrong AnnuityIsGreat and as for RJOh I predict that it would be STUPID of me too believe what you say even if you are a real psychic you have nocontrol or information on when or if I'll hit a Lottery Jackpot,that's totally up too me and when I do I'll Post a message here and even send a copy of my winning ticket too Todd for proof.I know a lot about Psychic ability I studied it for 6 yrs along with otherMetaphysical Sciences psychics don't always know everything about other peo... [ More ]

Reply #32

AnnuityIsGreat — Sun, 27 Apr 2003 19:57:02 GMT

The world is in a mess right now.

Reply #31

CASH Only — Sun, 27 Apr 2003 19:52:09 GMT

AIG:The world will be in one fine mess when pick-3/4 winners receive annuity payments.

Reply #30

AnnuityIsGreat — Sun, 27 Apr 2003 19:42:08 GMT

No RJOH. Being also a pyschic, no one who is a MEMEBER of this lotterypost will ever win the jackpot. EVER. PERIOD. Prove me wrong

Reply #29

Thomas Covenant — Sun, 27 Apr 2003 19:27:09 GMT

RJOh, I think it would be a fa

Reply #28

RJOh — Sun, 27 Apr 2003 19:13:20 GMT

Gentlemen,I am psychic, I predict that neither one of you will win a jackpot within the next month. Please post in one month if I am wrong.RJOh

Reply #27

Thomas Covenant — Sun, 27 Apr 2003 18:57:53 GMT

I was being sarcastic when I said I was psychic. I don't believe anyone is psychic. There has never been a successful double-blind psychic test. Not one. Astrology is pretty lame also. The hospital building would affect you more than any planet in the universe.(besides earth). Ok, so there may be some force in the universe we haven't found yet. But these forces would apply to black holes, quasars, and the almost infinite number of stars and planets that we have not discovered. Yet these are not... [ More ]

Reply #26

Lottowiz34 — Sun, 27 Apr 2003 17:37:56 GMT

I don't need too prove anything too you just like you don't need too prove your so called psychic abilities too me.And you just contradicted yourself ifmy refusing too post any numbers is being lame then your just as lame for not posting any predictions.And you being Psychic doesn't make you special I studiedAstrology,Numerology,Tarot,Magic and Psychic Phenomenafor 5 yrs and everyone has psychic ability too some degree some more than others,Aries,Gemini,Aquarius and Pisces have strong psychic ch... [ More ]

Reply #25

Thomas Covenant — Sun, 27 Apr 2003 15:58:53 GMT

You can't prove anything you say, Lottowiz. So what's the point. You refuse to post any of your picks. Your excuse is that you have nothing to prove. Sure. That's a good excuse. It sounds pretty lame to me. I will let you in on a little secret. I am psychic. I have predicted many major world dvents in the last couple of years. Of course, I'm not going to write any of my predictions down. I don't have to prove anything to you or anyone else.

Reply #24

Lottowiz34 — Sun, 27 Apr 2003 15:20:04 GMT

My method of play doesn't require buying a lot of tickets.I spend anywhere from 5 to 20 dollars no more and that's for all the games.And we don't lose more than quick-pick players or anyone else if anything it would be equal,but for players who are PRO's they win more than they lose and quick-pick or luck number players lose more than they win by far.So get your factsstraight.I get better statements from VISIONDUDE at least he knows more about what he says then you do.AndI'm not getting HYPER I... [ More ]

Reply #23

Thomas Covenant — Sun, 27 Apr 2003 15:06:18 GMT

Lottowiz, you are the one getting all hyper about this. I am just stating my opinion. I do agree with you about some things. Lottery system players do win more than other players. They also lose more. That is because they play more. A lot of the systems require you to buy a lot of tickets. I do understand Sedertree's site, what I don't understand is how this applies to predicting lottery numbers. All of it is hindsight.

Reply #22

Lottowiz34 — Sun, 27 Apr 2003 14:56:29 GMT

There's no false perception here my friend the only problem I see is your inability too look beyond what is considered impossible.If there's no order in random numbers then I guess the reason I win playing the numbers using these methods is because of Magic and Lottery Spirits anyway that's all I have too say I've got more important things too do than debate with someone who has a BrainWashed way of thinking.Good Day

Reply #21

Lottowiz34 — Sun, 27 Apr 2003 14:46:18 GMT

And too respond to your Ridiculous comment that it takes MILLIONS of draws too form patterns.This proves too me without a doubt that you DON'T KNOW what your talking about because anyone who knows will tell you that patterns form very quickly,in the Pick-6 52 drawswill show distinct patterns,in the Pick-5 30-60 drawsand in the Pick-3 4 games (short term 10-20)(long term40-60).

Reply #20

Thomas Covenant — Sun, 27 Apr 2003 14:40:48 GMT

Illusory correlation. Look the term up.

Reply #19

Lottowiz34 — Sun, 27 Apr 2003 14:40:38 GMT

Listen Thomas,this is really starting too get old with you.I understand Mr.Sedertree's concepts and have the Demo of his Software so it's obvious that all this stuff is above your Head and since you can't understand or your just too Close Minded about it you prefer too attack it and us.You see if we are able too hit the numbers using these methods then obviously it works,and all this talk about challenging is ridiculous your not gonna hit every sinlge day but it's possible too hit 2 or 3 times a... [ More ]

Reply #18

Lottowiz34 — Sun, 27 Apr 2003 14:10:26 GMT

Obviously you didn't read or you just don't understandso I'll make it more simple for you.The Cause of Random Numbers forming patterns and trends which is the Effect is the result of the numbers being drawn over and over and over again for a LONG period of timewhich is called Long Term Trend Analysis a Short TermTrend happens in a SHORT period of time say 3 or 4 wks After the numbers have been recycled so many times you start too notice things like repeats,skips,overdue,HotCold etc....Yo... [ More ]

Reply #17

Sedertree — Sun, 27 Apr 2003 00:04:11 GMT

Thomas,I agree that Mega-Millions and PowerBall Officials put in a lot of overtime to ensure that no Mechanical Bias exists. Thinking, rightly so, that they are creating a truly random outcome.Now let's agree that the numbers are random and no Mechanical Bias exists. So if the numbers are indeed random. Then a very clear Bell Curve (Natural Bias) will result if you record the numbers from past draws. This is a fact in the world of statistics. If you don't believe me then research it for you... [ More ]

Reply #16

Thomas Covenant — Sat, 26 Apr 2003 20:47:34 GMT

I read your website(somewhat) and I still don't see how it applies to lottery numbers. Any number has just as much chance of coming up as any other. Trends may happen because of physical properties, but those physical properties are kept minimal or changed all together by the lottery officals. It took Nick Perry a heck of a lot of paint to fix the lottery balls. With the balls being almost identical it could take millions of draws to form a pattern.

Reply #15

Sedertree — Sat, 26 Apr 2003 19:15:38 GMT

Thomas,A 50/50 Threshold is basically a coin toss (duality). Which is unpredictable for the most part. I have developed a non-biased method for dealing with dualities. However it is not used in my system at this point. Which is why my system only rarely computes a non-biased matrix lower than 60/40. Sometimes the bias gets so bad that even higher matrices (60/40 and above) cannot be calculated.Going any lower at that point requires a Biased Matrix. This is good because by then, the system

Reply #14

Thomas Covenant — Sat, 26 Apr 2003 18:14:16 GMT

>The odds of that same digit falling in that postion is 1:10. The odds of a different digit falling in that position is 9:10. This is effective until we reach the 50/50 Threshold, 5:10. If a digit/number repeates before that threshold, It is due to bias. Most of the time it is due to Natural Bias. Only by looking at the big picture can we verify for certain whether it was natural or mechanical, ie; the digits that preceeded the beginning cutoff.>I didn't quite understand that, could you expand o... [ More ]

Reply #13

Sedertree — Sat, 26 Apr 2003 17:42:57 GMT

Guys,I'd like to throw my two cents in here.IMO there are two kinds of Bias, Natural and Mechanical.Natural Bias is present in any random dvent. The laws that govern this type of bias have to do with the tendency of dvents to take on the bell-shaped or Gaussian Curve over time.Mechanical Bias has to do, of course, with the mechanical dynamics of the machines, ball weight, air pressure, size of the bin, order of the balls as they drop etc.It is very easy to determine which bias is effecting the... [ More ]

Reply #12

Thomas Covenant — Sat, 26 Apr 2003 13:39:56 GMT

You didn't answer my question. You described the effect. What is the cause

Reply #11

Lottowiz34 — Sat, 26 Apr 2003 12:57:44 GMT

Well that's quite simple really,you see Thomas when random numbers repeat themselves draw after draw for along period of time they start forming biases and noticeable patterns.For example let's say FL just started a Lottery game and the first draw was this weekend I wouldn't be able too use any of my systems or software.Now patterns would start too develop after 52 draws then I would start too see numbers repeating,skipping 2 draws and hitting again a number that hasn't been drawn in 2 or 3 week... [ More ]

Reply #10

Thomas Covenant — Sat, 26 Apr 2003 02:35:51 GMT

I just need a simple answer to this one. Do you understand Cause and Effect? The effect would be the number sets of the drawings forming patterns and trends. This effect must have a Cause. So, what causes this Effect

Reply #9

Lottowiz34 — Fri, 25 Apr 2003 10:28:05 GMT

Mr.Covenant were you born a stubborn person? first of all the fact that the numbers come from a machine that bounces the balls around and calculating there trajectories,humidity,temperature,air pressure,distance or different ball sets and containersor whether they switch balls has nothing too do with using Lottery Software or Systems.None of this information is used or programmed into the software and seeing as how you have no EXPERIENCE what so ever in using these tools you wouldn't understand... [ More ]

Reply #8

Thomas Covenant — Fri, 25 Apr 2003 09:18:02 GMT

So how does these programs work? People forget that the numbers come from balls bouncing around in a container. Does your program calculate the trajectories of all the balls? Does it calculate air pressure, temperture, humidity, speed, direction of rotation? Does it take into account the different sets of balls that are used? Does it take into account the different containers that are used. How long does it take to establish a pattern? 1 draw, 5 draws, 100 draws? What happens if they switch ball... [ More ]

Reply #7

AnnuityIsGreat — Thu, 24 Apr 2003 17:40:20 GMT

savelot,my advice: 1) buy three (or four) sets of 10 ping pong balls = price: $5.002) buy a black magic marker = price: $1.003) steal three (or four) 5 gallon empty water bottles from your neighbors = price: $04) mark each set of ping pong balls with # 0 - 95) place each set of balls in each set of the empty water bottles6) shake each water bottle and draw one ball7) repeat # 6 for the remaining 2 or 3 bottles8) use the #s that come out as your pick The system above is the cheapest an... [ More ]

Reply #6

Lottowiz34 — Thu, 24 Apr 2003 17:26:09 GMT

( Blasphemy )sorry for the mispelling.And one final comment for you Mr.Convenant why do I have too prove myself if your never gonna believe otherwise?Your Brainwashed into thinking nothing works except buying quick-picks,I never won anything using quick-picks but ever since I started picking my own numbers I've done quite well for myself.Are you trying too convince me that what I'm doing doesn't work? if so that is stupidthat's like me telling you too use a shoe to put a nail in the wall when a... [ More ]

Reply #5

Lottowiz34 — Thu, 24 Apr 2003 17:08:26 GMT

Mr.Covenant we have gone down this road before and as long as your mind is stuck in the Middle Ages where anything that is not possible in your eyes is Blaspemy there's no reason for me too discuss this with you.Furthermore you don't pay me when I hit the numbers the State Lottery does so I have nothing too prove to you.Talking too you is like trying too convince Castro Communism is dead and a Democratic Government is possible,you won't accept the fact that it's possible too achieve an advanta... [ More ]

Reply #4

Thomas Covenant — Thu, 24 Apr 2003 09:09:29 GMT

How can one be skillful at picking random numbers? You have yet to prove your skill lottowiz.

Reply #3

Lottowiz34 — Thu, 24 Apr 2003 00:32:54 GMT

If your lazy or don't have any skill at picking numbers then Quick-Picks would be a good choice.

Reply #2

Thomas Covenant — Wed, 23 Apr 2003 09:03:32 GMT

Quick pick

Reply #1

Lottowiz34 — Tue, 22 Apr 2003 22:40:56 GMT

Well that would depend on how much money your willing too spend and whether your looking for a paper\pencilstrategy or lottery software.

what is the best system for 3&4 digit?

savealot — Tue, 22 Apr 2003 22:33:35 GMT

Hi Bill here, From Michigan and I have just joined as a new member, And would like to know what system do you think works the best for 3 digit and 4 digit ? oh yes it would really help if you use it in Michigan. Thanks...