Belgium lotto results

Reply #25

MarkS — Mon, 13 Oct 2003 18:18:56 GMT

Hi GuruYou said you found something that may improve things without adding too much processing time. How is it going so far? Did it improve something?Dont give up

Reply #24

reddog — Mon, 13 Oct 2003 06:35:46 GMT

Guru, don't give up.

Reply #23

Irvin — Mon, 13 Oct 2003 03:52:58 GMT

Guru,If your syste

Reply #22

luckycat — Mon, 13 Oct 2003 01:33:18 GMT

gur

Reply #21

Guru — Sun, 12 Oct 2003 21:52:23 GMT

Making some very last minute changes here in the program. Found something that may improve things without adding to much processing time. I'm checking it fast like a madman right now. hope it'll be ready for tuesday.

Reply #20

Pick — Sun, 12 Oct 2003 20:50:04 GMT

Hey Rick,I couldn't believe it when you asked if anybody used Pi to help get their numbers. I use it on the four digit and had better success with it than anything else I've ever tried.

Reply #19

reddog — Sun, 12 Oct 2003 20:40:30 GMT

Guru, hang in there.

Reply #18

Rick G — Sun, 12 Oct 2003 19:27:52 GMT

Hypersoniq,I'm not familiar with Euler's constant, but it was interesting that you posted it in 10 digit format. That's the same way I'm looking at the pi value , in 10 digit blocks. What numbers are coming up together on a routine basis. It would be interesting to compare to see if there was any correlation to mathematical constants of any kind with pure random numbers. I still believe there is order to chaos....at least that's what I tell everybody when they come to my home.......... [ More ]

Reply #17

hypersoniq — Sun, 12 Oct 2003 16:06:04 GMT

hmm.. pi? why not?the only way to see if it works is to check it out over past draw history.Another place to look could be Euler's Constant0.57721566 4901532860 6065120900 8240243104 2159335939 9235988057 6723488486 7726777664 6709369470 6329174674 9514631447 2498070824 8096050401 4486542836 2241739976 4492353625 3500333742 9373377376 7394279259 5258247094 9160087352 0394816567there are many different possibilities... worth a look...

Reply #16

MarkS — Sun, 12 Oct 2003 14:23:07 GMT

Belgium lotto is 6/42, not 6/49. Well if 6/49 is a tough nut to crack then what to say about new york lotto, 6/59 :) . Actually Guru, your predictions were better for new york lotto then for belgium lotto yesterday because two numbers that lotto synchronizer predicted occured in yesterdays drawing. Guru i really hope your system will work so i can finally kill this damn jackpot and get myself that BMW 745i.

Reply #15

Rick G — Sun, 12 Oct 2003 14:04:28 GMT

Here's a real odd-ball theory I've been looking at since I began reading Guru's thread, and I'd be interested in any feedback on it. First of all, I'm referring to the pick-3 as it is the easiest random number game to beat.Has anyone ever worked with the value of Pi as your source of random numbers? You have an unlimited source of random digits that occur together and yet they are bound together by a mathematical/universal constant, the circle.I know I sound crazy, but I really think there... [ More ]

Reply #14

hypersoniq — Sun, 12 Oct 2003 12:30:38 GMT

definitely keep going Guru... I'm frustrated after only a few weeks of toying with the theory... I can only imagine what it's like with a few years invested into the project. Just remember it's entirely possible to discuss theories and concepts in an open forum without giving away the actual implementation... you never know what a fresh set of eyes or two can bring to the table in terms of concepts we may have missed...

Reply #13

MarkS — Sun, 12 Oct 2003 11:55:53 GMT

I too think that Guru should definitely continue to post numbers here because as you all remember, he clearly stated that he wasnt able to deliver the 90 percent guarantee of matching 3 numbers each time you play. Keep on Guru! Also, Guru, i still dont kind of understand, can lotto synchronizer be used with pick 5 games such as mega millions (5/52)? Even if it cannot, what will happen if I for example will enter 5 numbers that were drawn in the past 3 draws and for the sixth number ill just ent... [ More ]

Reply #12

Todd — Sun, 12 Oct 2003 00:06:40 GMT

I'm with Rick G - no system gets it perfect on the first try. HOWEVER, guru should NEVER have stated that his system was guaranteed to win any number of predictions. Guru: keep trying, but learn to temper your claims, especially with an untested system.

Reply #11

emilyg — Sat, 11 Oct 2003 23:24:18 GMT

keep on guru

Reply #10

fja — Sat, 11 Oct 2003 23:10:53 GMT

All it'll take is one draw...I for one would like to see Guru continue his work to see if there is an increased measure of success vs. what all of us have done after a certain length of time....remember it is not easy to capture randomness...it is hard work...but the hard is what makes it a great game.....good luck to everyone else with a thought on how to capture lottery digits.

Reply #9

visiondude — Sat, 11 Oct 2003 21:42:19 GMT

remember the rule of thumb in here when gauging his success . that he can do.............what he claimed that he can do.i personally don't think one draw is an accurate test either. that is unless he claimed an every draw type claim and failed based on that claim.personally i wouldn't deem any system to be successful UNLESS it puts more money in my wallet than i was contributing .those of you who believe him remember that the only way he is successful is that he can make you mone... [ More ]

Reply #8

lootch — Sat, 11 Oct 2003 21:06:15 GMT

the test was a success as Guru promised to post numbers and thathe did. The numbers may not have been a success(this time) but the man certainly is.Rome wasnot built in a day and one test does not a systemmake. My hat is off to Guru

Reply #7

hypersoniq — Sat, 11 Oct 2003 20:57:15 GMT

Guru's original guarantee was 3 out of 10... looks like test one was a 33.3% success...

Reply #6

Rick G — Sat, 11 Oct 2003 20:21:57 GMT

Give the man a chance folks...none of us win on a single given day and drawing, especially playing a 6/49 game. I'd hate to see someone get discouraged from trying to beat a jackpot game . It's a very tough challenge as we all know and as yet I have not seen him pushing his product. A test is a test and the first try doesn't mean much.

Reply #5

Littleoldlady — Sat, 11 Oct 2003 20:05:18 GMT

We should really see if those numbers fall somewhere else...tonite. Who knows, maybe he really put the PB numbers up there.

Reply #4

DreamLotto — Sat, 11 Oct 2003 15:19:59 GMT

From Countdown To... DOWN Coun

Reply #3

Guru — Sat, 11 Oct 2003 15:19:34 GMT

sh*t happensWell, the system went on it's but this time. But I would say keep looking for the numbers for wednesday because I know it'll work.otherwise I wouldn't be doing this test. Judge my system within, aprox 10 tries, and you'll see

Reply #2

Littleoldlady — Sat, 11 Oct 2003 15:09:43 GMT

For these results, I know h

Reply #1

DreamLotto — Sat, 11 Oct 2003 15:05:28 GMT

Looks Like Guru The Great's Sy

Belgium lotto results

MarkS — Sat, 11 Oct 2003 14:57:40 GMT

6-19-26-27-34-37 and bonus ball 11 Prediction made by Guru's system:4 - 9 - 12 - 15 - 23 - 25 - 26 - 29 - 33 - 42