Best Filtering Method

Reply #33

Pick-4_Master — Wed, 18 Feb 2004 00:59:50 GMT

Filters are used for reducing combinations down to a more reasonable playing level.Without them I wouldn't be able to play because I would have to play every combination generated from my selected numbers.

Reply #32

goose — Thu, 12 Feb 2004 13:20:54 GMT

sorry,would system with a good filtering method make a winner if its really useful.So its only for commerical use for those lottery companies For real more good prediction,We need lotterypost.com! and more sites like this

Reply #31

Andrew — Thu, 12 Feb 2004 11:06:51 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by goose on February 11, 2004 filtering methods are made only for commerical purposes. Huh

Reply #30

goose — Wed, 11 Feb 2004 20:58:47 GMT

filtering methods are made only for commerical purposes.

Reply #29

goose — Wed, 11 Feb 2004 20:58:30 GMT

filtering methods are only for commerical purposes

Reply #28

Andrew — Tue, 10 Feb 2004 13:44:47 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by EXCALIBUR on January 23, 2004 The problem is REPRESENTATION That is, that they put numbers on the LOTTERY BALLS.So people think of the lottery as being NUMBERS The balls are not numbers, they are just balls.But there has to be a way to tell them apart, so they put numbers on them.They can, or could, just as well put letters on them, if there where enough letters in the alfabet to REPRESENT ALL THE BALLS But there are not enough letters, to NAME OR REPRESENT ALL T... [ More ]

Reply #27

hypersoniq — Fri, 23 Jan 2004 19:22:21 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Colin F on January 23, 2004 stop thinking of the Lotto numbers drawn as being anything other than Integers which are used to identify objects.Exactly...it is just like the numbers on the top 3 finishers on a NASCAR race, they are there to just identify the driver.BUT, if you know the layout and order of balls before they are dropped into the machine, there could be some fuel for vector analysis...

Reply #26

Colin F — Fri, 23 Jan 2004 18:35:41 GMT

The reality is that once you get away from thinking of the balls or objects as having a number other than for identification it makes some of the calculations used in filters as ridiculous. You are basically left with absence, short term occurrence and long term occurrence.Colin F

Reply #25

EXCALIBUR — Fri, 23 Jan 2004 17:01:39 GMT

Check this out.http://www.lotto-logix.com/txthouse/symbols.html

Reply #24

goose — Fri, 23 Jan 2004 06:57:40 GMT

If you waste more time on filtering,you will lose everything and hope you ever hadthe reason is simple:filtering methods needs choicesCHOICES

Reply #23

EXCALIBUR — Fri, 23 Jan 2004 06:25:53 GMT

The problem is REPRESENTATION That is, that they put numbers on the LOTTERY BALLS.So people think of the lottery as being NUMBERS The balls are not numbers, they are just balls.But there has to be a way to tell them apart, so they put numbers on them.They can, or could, just as well put letters on them, if there where enough letters in the alfabet to REPRESENT ALL THE BALLS But there are not enough letters, to NAME OR REPRESENT ALL THE BALLS They could use any symbols, instead of numbers to... [ More ]

Reply #22

Colin F — Fri, 23 Jan 2004 04:15:19 GMT

I've mentioned it once before in this forum only to be told that I was hanging on by five threads.There is a basic concept which I came to grips with over two years ago. It is simply to stop thinking of the Lotto numbers drawn as being anything other than Integers which are used to identify objects.From there if your not interested in creative programming and the many hundreds of hours you need to put in to achieve good proficiency then you would need to reassess your interest.Probability is use... [ More ]

Reply #21

konane — Wed, 21 Jan 2004 01:44:54 GMT

Lotto Pro 2003, probably soon to be updated to LP 2004, has a Number Statistics Chart/Graph which can be set from one draw all the way to every draw for the game to give a look at how many times each number has hit during the time you set it for. That one is helpful because it has a color graph. Also I use their filter Search Previous Drawings where any combination of numbers can be input to take a look at how they performed with other numbers in past draws. I normally set my search on mi... [ More ]

Reply #20

EXCALIBUR — Tue, 20 Jan 2004 18:04:07 GMT

For the pick3 eliminate triples, doubles, what is left is 720 numbers use the box filter and get 120 numbers,Use sum range of 7 to 20use root range 2 to 8use low numbers 1 to 2use even numbers 1 to 2Make sure that the numbers that are left, have at least 1 number that is the same, as one of the numbers from the past 2 pick3 draws.It does not matter much if you separate day or night or put them together, try both ways and whichever works best for you, use that.Also see if most of the numbers comm... [ More ]

Reply #19

CASH Only — Sat, 17 Jan 2004 15:19:27 GMT

Mike:In a 5/30 each number should appear ever six drawings.

Reply #18

MikeK — Mon, 05 Jan 2004 16:53:41 GMT

Repeat Numbers:My suggestion in the situation of repeating numbers PICK 6 or PICK 5 currently is...Starting with the highest percentage to the lowest potential repeat numbers, you add the repeat options until you are over 50% and aget rid of the other choices.In a 6/49 lottery thte chances for no repeats are 43.6% and for 1 repeat 41.3% (together 84.9%) those I would use and get rid of the other ones.In the case of Powerball 5/53 already no repreat will be higher than 50% (59.7%) and these would... [ More ]

Reply #17

CASH Only — Mon, 05 Jan 2004 16:14:08 GMT

BobP:Ohio is expected to revamp its Lotto again soon. Whether or not they keep its bonus ball, I would like to see OH drop its Kicker .

Reply #16

goose — Sun, 28 Dec 2003 08:36:02 GMT

do you know a math technical term called probability?If you know how that,try it.Thats the best filtering method I would commend

Reply #15

Clipper — Fri, 26 Dec 2003 22:37:14 GMT

Oh my.....cant say as that I use any of them, but then, what I do use in my software could be considered some of them lol......just not given that name.Since my software is homemade I have ways to eliminate (filter out) possible combinations. The software itself has a controlled number generator . The first thing I do is generate 220 possible combinations based upon the numbers themselves in relation to how they have been playing.Of that 220, most of the time I can eliminate 120, and th... [ More ]

Reply #14

CASH Only — Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:39:17 GMT

I don't bother with filters-not even for coffee.

Reply #13

lottoarchitect — Sat, 22 Nov 2003 13:17:59 GMT

All these filters are good as

Reply #12

RJOh — Sat, 22 Nov 2003 03:01:36 GMT

Looking at the previous drawings of 348/349 records I counted these matchesMatched Regular Numbers Including Bonus Number 0 152 132 1 140 147 2 48 58 3 8 11RJOh

Reply #11

BobP — Wed, 29 Oct 2003 03:54:21 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on October 24, 2003 In Ohio649P lottery, 191 of the 341 drawings have had a number or two from the previous drawing.no.of draws no.of draws before repeat 191 0 90 1 36 2 13 3 4 4 1 7_______________________RJOh It's the bonus ball that's throwing off the ratio there with the Ohio game.The other aspect is you're lumping all the possible repeat... [ More ]

Reply #10

RJOh — Fri, 24 Oct 2003 14:20:33 GMT

In Ohio649P lottery, 191 of the 341 drawings have had a number or two from the previous drawing.no.of draws no.of draws before repeat 191 0 90 1 36 2 13 3 4 4 1 7_______________________RJOh

Reply #9

BobP — Thu, 23 Oct 2003 02:27:01 GMT

All those filters are valid, but only for removing the most extreme. If you remove 10% filters like 5odd/1even then ten such filters will contain at least one that comes in every draw making winning impossible. The best filter is no numbers from the previous draw. In a 6/49 type game it is the correct choice most often and sweeps about 8 million combinations off the table for jackpot :-) and half the lower prize possibilities too. :-(BobP

Reply #8

kbcherokee — Wed, 22 Oct 2003 21:01:28 GMT

My .2 cents worth...Pay attention to the Bell-Cure.Chief

Reply #7

JADELottery — Fri, 17 Oct 2003 05:43:35 GMT

You need to look at the draw numbers relative to the filters you've just listed, plus a few more not listed here. There's a linear regression and a past mean average method used to produce a multi harmonic N th degree dimishing variable function. I would like to go further, however, my work is incomplete. I've been working on it for a few years now.

Reply #6

DreamLotto — Fri, 17 Oct 2003 05:29:07 GMT

Hey Senior Comrade,Please Be Good Enough To Elaborate With Examples/Digital Method. We Are Stewing In Suspense!Thanks

Reply #5

JADELottery — Fri, 17 Oct 2003 05:26:16 GMT

I've said it before... it's not only what comes up, also, when it occurs... temporal, but in a digital method relative to the draw number.

Reply #4

DreamLotto — Fri, 17 Oct 2003 05:20:16 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by JADELottery on October 17, 2003 ...I also don't just restrict my analysis to what you listed... Well Doug,So You INDEED Do Something Different...Right?! Care To Share The Secret Please?!Thanks

Reply #3

JADELottery — Fri, 17 Oct 2003 01:41:28 GMT

I discarded my vote also. However, for a different reason. All the methods you listed are valid and have a place in analysis of lotto numbers. I also don't just restrict my analysis to what you listed.

Reply #2

hypersoniq — Thu, 16 Oct 2003 13:00:16 GMT

I discarded a vote, nothing on the list has ever helped me out

Reply #1

DreamLotto — Thu, 16 Oct 2003 06:21:52 GMT

Thanks For The Nice Rejoinder, RJoh...Hope The Site Admin Makes Room For More Options On His Poll Page!May The House Odds INVERT On You!Love

Best Filtering Method

DreamLotto — Thu, 16 Oct 2003 06:02:24 GMT

Dear Lotto Lovers,Lotto Software Era Is Upon Us, And There Are Filters ALL OVER Us.(Until I Discovered Lotto Software Recently, I Thought FILTERS Were Confined Only To Cigarettes, Which Is Incidentally Another Pastime...Sort Of!)Given The Above Scenario, Can Anyone Suggest What Filters Are The Most Result Oriented Ones To Use Based On YOUR Actual Experience Using LOTTO Software?!I Would Also Appreciate Knowing About Any Other Interesting Type OF Filter Commonly Used But NOT LISTED Here With A Na... [ More ]