<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Low Numbers In High JackPots</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/75068</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/75068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Low Numbers In High JackPots</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/75068/140066</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/75068/140066</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2003 03:34:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>DreamLotto</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hey Friends,I see very lukewarm reply to this poll. I guess either the topic was not to your liking or YOU REALLY have something, more POWERFUL, and more effective, and different that you are HESITATING to share!Or can someone add Part II of this poll to fathom out the truth about fathoming lower numbers?!Thanks and welcome to re-polling!Love All</p>]]></description>
			<category>DreamLotto</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/75068/139035</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/75068/139035</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:45:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>hypersoniq</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>in Powerball (white balls only), in the last 14 drawings over 100 Million...1-9......11 times (7 times over 130 million...2 @&#x3e;200M )10-19..15 times (8 times over 130 million...3 @&#x3e;200M)20-29..13 times (6 times over 130 million...4 @&#x3e;200M)30-39..13 times (7 times over 130 million...3 @&#x3e;200M)40-49..12 times (5 times over 130 million...0 @&#x3e;200M)50-53...6 times (5 times over 130 million...3 @&#x3e;200M ) based on that, I&#x27;m inclined to go with more numbers in the 50&#x27;s than in the 40&#x27;s... and not heavy on... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/75068/139035">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>hypersoniq</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Low Numbers In High JackPots</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/75068</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/75068</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2003 09:34:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>DreamLotto</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear Lotto Friends,This Poll Is To Gauge The Importance Of Playing LOW NumbersWhen The JACKPOT SWELLSGreenBacks To You</p>]]></description>
			<category>DreamLotto</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

