Lotto Sync test II retry

Reply #49

lottoking — Mon, 27 Oct 2003 23:30:55 GMT

nein,the battle isalready on

Reply #48

BobP — Mon, 27 Oct 2003 21:28:06 GMT

Kbcherokee:Maybe we're talking about two different games. I'm looking at the Powerball single number the 1/42 draw. If we're talking about the adjacent number, say 7 is drawn so we look for 6 or 8 to appear in the next draw . . . that's the Gail Howard C - chart and that tells us in the 1202 powerballs drawn from 04/22/92 to 10/25/03 the adjacent number to the previous drawn number was drawn only 60 times a 0.0 percent. The powerballs repeated only 24 times. However, in looking at the draws,... [ More ]

Reply #47

luckycat — Mon, 27 Oct 2003 21:05:37 GMT

waiting your reply l o t t o k i n g

Reply #46

Bug — Mon, 27 Oct 2003 19:31:47 GMT

Don't hold your breath!Shampoo System1. Make grand claims for your product.2. Produce long winded posts and no results.3. Rinse and Repeat.

Reply #45

RJOh — Mon, 27 Oct 2003 18:39:03 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Todd on October 25, 2003 I'd be willing to put up money in a battle between Guru's software and the Lottery Post Quick Picks Generator. Let the battle begin

Reply #44

kbcherokee — Mon, 27 Oct 2003 17:52:39 GMT

BobP:I'm not sayin' it repeat's. I'm sayin' it hit's next too or above or below a previous number in the previous game. Over 65% of the time this happens. An interesting Stat.Being drawn from another Drum and different number's, you wouldn't think this would happen, but it does. This Stat has helped me pick more MB or PB number's in many games.Chief

Reply #43

luckycat — Mon, 27 Oct 2003 04:09:58 GMT

thanks Lottoshl

Reply #42

BobP — Mon, 27 Oct 2003 01:57:03 GMT

Kbcherokee:Yes, the Powerball often repeats within a reasonable number of future draws. Look up the Birthday Paradox for understanding.BobP

Reply #41

lottoshlep — Mon, 27 Oct 2003 00:44:20 GMT

luckycat,try http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/ , then ask Guru for the name of the city where the draw takes place ... if he posted it already, I missed it (although Belgium is prob only one time zone, so Brussels will do).

Reply #40

luckycat — Sun, 26 Oct 2003 19:45:32 GMT

time ins important dif countrys:usa time zone 4:34 PM sunday est lottery postBelgium zone 10:34 PM sunday GURUPortugal ZONe?_______________Enzo1anyone give correct times in comparison with USA time

Reply #39

kbcherokee — Sun, 26 Oct 2003 19:42:06 GMT

Guru:How can that be when the MB or PB number is picked from another Drum and another set of number's?Chief

Reply #38

luckycat — Sun, 26 Oct 2003 19:38:37 GMT

enzo 1

Reply #37

DreamLotto — Sun, 26 Oct 2003 17:28:14 GMT

Hi Bug,I conducted the tests for our (Indian) Lotteries only (online lotteries are just over 18 months in India, and the concept of using software to manage them is new too) and posted the limited findings with a hope that someone with more experience would replicate, refine, improvize on, and SHARE it.As for the win/loss ratio, I guess I will post the ACUTAL, tabulated results, possibly with ticket scans (if I have five or more hits) rather than theoretical ones, AFTER I test these new ideas on... [ More ]

Reply #36

Bug — Sun, 26 Oct 2003 17:09:40 GMT

What is the win/loss ratio on your system, numbers posted here?How many sets of numbers have you posted for the Mega Millions or PowerBall

Reply #35

DreamLotto — Sun, 26 Oct 2003 16:37:30 GMT

Hi KBC and Guru:Though I am not a programmer like you folks out here, I feel, the solution to your problems lies in attacking a lottery in truely clustered, KENO-LIKE fashion, whereby numbers AROUND, ROUND, and ABOUT the previously drawn numbers are tackled! If we did this with past three draws, I feel we can come up with a good set of COMMON numbers to play! This can be accomplished with a pencil and paper, though. But a good program with added features can do a better job, I feel. Now read thi... [ More ]

Reply #34

Guru — Sun, 26 Oct 2003 15:58:08 GMT

Kbcherokee:This is because the numbers just over or below, are part of the expression of an earlier drawn number. (this is theoretical, but my research results point in that direction)for instance:9 and 11 together or succesive is the same expression as the number 105 and 6 together or succesive is the same expression as the numbers 7 or 4

Reply #33

kbcherokee — Sun, 26 Oct 2003 15:47:32 GMT

Guru:I have been observing you and the other's on your system. I haven't said anything until now. I do believe there are way's of improving your odds of winning. Even with my lil' system, I get more number's than I would buying QP's.But answer me this. Why is it that over 65% of the time the MB or PB number either hit's next too, over or below a previous number drawn in an earlier draw? I have been tracking this piece of information for some time now and it alway's happens.Chief... [ More ]

Reply #32

reddog — Sun, 26 Oct 2003 14:38:47 GMT

Guru, just ignore them and get that system fine tuned. Before I spend $100 of my hard earned money I want to see BIG results.

Reply #31

Guru — Sun, 26 Oct 2003 14:20:35 GMT

true dreamlotto. these jokers really mess things up. But I'm getting used to it.

Reply #30

Guru — Sun, 26 Oct 2003 14:18:36 GMT

hey prometheus, where can we o

Reply #29

DreamLotto — Sun, 26 Oct 2003 14:17:07 GMT

Hello all and Todd,Don't you think the above post is too distracting and needs to be shifted to a noisier room?! Well...just an opinion!Thanks

Reply #28

Prometheus1 — Sun, 26 Oct 2003 14:09:06 GMT

My Machine is 'just around the corner' In one demonstration, I can lift a piece of metal and hold a magnet to it. I can demonstrate that because the magnet will stay on the metal indefinitely, it is a source of infinite energy. This is a hard fact and is an unquestionable reality. How it works I can combine infinite energy from a magnet with what I call counter-rotation technology, which turns Newton's third law of motion (when one object exerts a force on... [ More ]

Reply #27

Bug — Sun, 26 Oct 2003 11:30:01 GMT

How much money has this system lost so far

Reply #26

Guru — Sun, 26 Oct 2003 09:18:34 GMT

Next set of numbers will be in on tuesday

Reply #25

DreamLotto — Sun, 26 Oct 2003 09:04:26 GMT

Hi All,Sorry to i

Reply #24

Guru — Sun, 26 Oct 2003 08:47:26 GMT

Rjoh:You mistake the system hypersoniq is working on with the Lotto synchronizer system. We don't use a RNG with a special seed. that's hypersoniq his thing.To All:About the quick-pick thing. Quick picks are not too bad a way to play. If the RNG is a good one, you will at least be playing a natural group of numbers. But Quick-Picks have no clue of where they are picking in the random number universe if I may call it that way.If I may ask this question. Who can say here, they win 5 correct ever... [ More ]

Reply #23

hypersoniq — Sun, 26 Oct 2003 04:12:37 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Guru on October 25, 2003 Hypersoniq:I do not agree with your thing. a 6 out of just 6 numbers is not impossible, but it is highly unrealistic to set this as your goal. In my opinion, it would be a waste of time to devote any great amount of effort into anything but a winning result.Randomness should have a deterministic character in order to make this work out. (this can not be true, because sooner or later lotto results would get into a loop and repeat exactly the sa... [ More ]

Reply #22

lottoking — Sun, 26 Oct 2003 04:10:07 GMT

Guru,the problem you mentioned appear in my system too -- Or a number 5 for example presents itself not as 5 but as 4 and or 6 (together). Or when a number 7 is predicted, it is difficult to estimate wether this number will be drawn really as number 7 or as number 8 when there is already a number 9 in the last draw My way is to put all these 3 kinds together and keep reducing the sets.welcome to communiatenansen

Reply #21

RJOh — Sun, 26 Oct 2003 02:44:45 GMT

LottoCheata had a similar test a year ago where he picked ~300 lines for a PowerBall drawing with his program against ~300 lines picked by a RNG and the RNG's numbers won. He explained that his program was bias to pick a winning number within a small range and could not in a short run compete with a RNG that picked all sort of numbers over a larger range. I suspect that Guru program would do no better since he hasn't prove that a particular seed number is better than any other seed when using... [ More ]

Reply #20

visiondude — Sun, 26 Oct 2003 02:10:40 GMT

Quote

Reply #19

Todd — Sun, 26 Oct 2003 01:50:12 GMT

I'd be willing to put up money in a battle between Guru's software and the Lottery Post Quick Picks Generator.

Reply #18

RJOh — Sun, 26 Oct 2003 01:46:47 GMT

$100 for RNG even if it does have a special seed is a lot of $. I would think one could program a regular RNG in a loop to pick 10 numbers and when ever a set of 10 have 4 or more numbers from the last draws loop one more time and print out the last loop.RJOh

Reply #17

Todd — Sun, 26 Oct 2003 00:04:31 GMT

BTW, I believe the price that Guru is asking on his site is 87 Euros, not $87. 87 Euros would equate to about $100 USD.

Reply #16

Guru — Sat, 25 Oct 2003 23:29:21 GMT

Hypersoniq:I do not agree with your thing. a 6 out of just 6 numbers is not impossible, but it is highly unrealistic to set this as your goal. Randomness should have a deterministic character in order to make this work out. (this can not be true, because sooner or later lotto results would get into a loop and repeat exactly the same outcomes !!). In my opinion it is not deterministic but probabilistic or partly both. The same thing can be seen in genetics. The deterministic part makes us humans

Reply #15

hypersoniq — Sat, 25 Oct 2003 22:38:21 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Guru on October 25, 2003 I always said I was trying to reach the 90% 3 correct in 10Would you buy a car that was 90% guaranteed to start in 3 of 10 tries? Would you knowingly enter a race with the stated goal of coming in 4th or 5th?I'm not bringing over the bad vibes from the other thread... quite the contrary... I can relate... I have locked up a PII machine for 11 hours only to find no good results, I AM however convinced you may be onto something... but why not go... [ More ]

Reply #14

Guru — Sat, 25 Oct 2003 21:50:57 GMT

Enzo:Thank's for the regular font size in your last post.I'm not saying my claims were not true. I always said I was trying to reach the 90% 3 correct in 10. Along the way I posted, that this goal could not be reached for the 1.5 version (for different reasons). The other claims that are left, is that it will perform better and more consistent than anything else on the market, and that it will increase the odds of winning dramaticly.I stick to those claims.But I am fully aware that claiming some... [ More ]

Reply #13

Enzo1 — Sat, 25 Oct 2003 18:05:15 GMT

Yes ok. you are all correct. I was really upset.I guess no body has the right to claim one thing, and after catching everyone's attention say that it's not 100 % true.Eveen so, 87 dollars is too much for a little thing that works a few weeks. It doesnt work all the time.There are thousands of methods like these to predict 10 numbers and SOMETIMES will dventually hit 3 numbers!I just dont think GURU is doing things the right way. He is just trying to get everyone's attention, and then sell the so... [ More ]

Reply #12

Guru — Sat, 25 Oct 2003 10:44:24 GMT

OK. In this way, we can continueThanks

Reply #11

Todd — Sat, 25 Oct 2003 10:35:59 GMT

DreamLotto, I agree. Enzo, please be calm, if you have a warning or thoughts please don't be inflammitory. If it turns out you're right, I'm sure the message will get across just fine.

Reply #10

DreamLotto — Sat, 25 Oct 2003 10:14:48 GMT

Enzo:Remember, this section IS NOT for spewing any insults or making SUPER CLAIMS! I suggest you go to another room (the previous room) leaving this room clean and intact for tests, and ONLY TESTS!!And...please don't be so aggressive with your fonts...normal fonts are just as fine for you to get your point across and for us to read and understand..! Where is Todd, by the way?! I believe everything ends on a good note!Thanks all

Reply #9

Guru — Sat, 25 Oct 2003 10:01:14 GMT

Enzo:I thought we would start things over in a polite manner. Don't mess it up again my friend.If I were a fraud. Then why the hell would I put something tracable in my numbers????I'm not going to be carried away by this again !! Hope those interested in the test will try to ignore this. (may be difficult since he really uses a big font size

Reply #8

Enzo1 — Sat, 25 Oct 2003 09:14:37 GMT

I am so sorry GURU. But i've been a little sceptical about your program.Last night i just found something very interesting.with the data2-6-10-19-27--28 - 235-10-16-25-34-37 - 211-3-4-18-38-40 - 21I CAN MAKE THE 10 NUMBERS PREDICTION THAT YOUR PROGRAM DOES, WITH PAPER AND PEENCIL IN JUST ABOUT2 MINUTS !!!!!!!!!!Everyone dont be fooled by GURU! What his program does is pure ARITMETIC.GURU: IF YOU WANT I CAN PROOVE THIS FOR YOU. YOU GIVE ME 3 DRAWS, AND I'LL MAKE THAT 10 NUMBER PREDICTION IN JUST... [ More ]

Reply #7

DreamLotto — Sat, 25 Oct 2003 01:36:16 GMT

Hi Folks,Now that GURU has decided to enter the stage afresh (649 cheers to you, GURU for mustering such courage amidst so much cacophony and gaggle...) with presumably more preparedness this time, let's desist from making ANY sort of negative comments, at least intentionally, or do anything that distracts this upcoming programmer from his chosen goal, with a wish to show the lotto world something new...! NO MATTER WHAT THE final outcome of his TESTS is...!Thanks all,Love

Reply #6

lottoshlep — Fri, 24 Oct 2003 14:04:17 GMT

Can't be faulted for trying

Reply #5

BobP — Fri, 24 Oct 2003 13:55:19 GMT

Part of the problem may be the lottery switching out ballsets and machines randomly for almost every draw. If there were a poor lottery with only one ballset and machine to work with I suspect the next step in the drunken walk would be more predictable. BobP

Reply #4

emilyg — Fri, 24 Oct 2003 12:20:58 GMT

welcome back guru.

Reply #3

luckycat — Fri, 24 Oct 2003 08:49:48 GMT

guru:time will tel

Reply #2

Irvin — Fri, 24 Oct 2003 08:16:24 GMT

Good luck Guru.Looking forward to the predictions.

Reply #1

DreamLotto — Fri, 24 Oct 2003 06:49:49 GMT

Yeah! THIS The GURU We All Wanted To See!Good Luck, Guru! No Hard Feelings Of The Past! We Are All With You!GreenBacks To All

Lotto Sync test II retry

Guru — Fri, 24 Oct 2003 06:17:35 GMT

Hi Guys. Lets start the tes