Quick Pick Scam for the states ?

Reply #13

gumpgyrl — Sat, 25 Oct 2003 22:40:58 GMT

LOL, Thanks Jorli D.

Reply #12

konane — Sat, 25 Oct 2003 21:31:04 GMT

The Ga lottery in an effort to keep results of the games random added unnecessary numbers of ballsets. Other states do not use as many ballsets per game as Ga does.I used to keep track of them by calling in, and about the time ballsets were increased in number overall payouts in all games including Cash 3, Cash 4, Fantasy 5, Ga Lotto and Big Game as it was named at that time decreased. Whether or not anyone with the lottery cares to admit it or not, when people slow down winning even small s... [ More ]

Reply #11

visiondude — Sat, 25 Oct 2003 21:02:01 GMT

the guy looks vaguely famil

Reply #10

Jorli D — Sat, 25 Oct 2003 19:34:16 GMT

He is not serious gumpgyrl. Bill Gates never developed a lottery, just a monopoly. LOL

Reply #9

gumpgyrl — Sat, 25 Oct 2003 16:41:57 GMT

WIN D,Are you serious

Reply #8

WIN D — Sat, 25 Oct 2003 10:07:00 GMT

Vision......here's a picture of the State's first Lottery Software developer. He came into a lot of money shortly after this picture was taken and moved some where in Washington State. We understand he got a huge infusion of money to start some sort of company up there. What happened to this guy after that is anybody's guess. All we know is that he only played Quick Picks and Cash was never a problem for him. ???? LOL

Reply #7

visiondude — Sat, 25 Oct 2003 01:21:16 GMT

say it ain't so WIN-D.

Reply #6

dvdiva — Sat, 25 Oct 2003 01:02:51 GMT

that would have to assume that the state knows what numbers are going to come out or a group of numbers designed to create large jackpots - we know megamillions doesnt have large jackpots and powerball also gets won occationally at really low amouts also if people learned that the lottery was in fact not random than no one would buy tickets.in this day of leaks - mostly with people whom have an agenda- the lottery would inevitably have a pissed off employee that would report and verify such non

Reply #5

doodoohead — Sat, 25 Oct 2003 00:23:04 GMT

Win d, Very interesting. I have long believed that the QP software was biased toward low chance picks. What a great way for the states to do a little cute gambling on their own. What are the odds? We're not talking about Pick-3 here. This is 10,000 to one in the first place. Almost 3 times the payout the second day. No way. Not that many people that pick their own numbers are that stupid to fight that chance 365 days a year waiting for that to happen. Maybe once a year or once every 3 years or... [ More ]

Reply #4

WIN D — Fri, 24 Oct 2003 23:31:38 GMT

Well .....just as long as you and I know about it, that's all that matters.

Reply #3

RJOh — Fri, 24 Oct 2003 23:26:45 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by WIN D on October 24, 2003 I really do believe that the states QP software is bias to issue a large amount of the LAST number drawn. That way a large amount of the QP'S are dead money for the players the next day. I'm sorry, I thought you meant that the software was picking numbers that were least likely to be drawn.RJOh

Reply #2

WIN D — Fri, 24 Oct 2003 23:16:34 GMT

Daaaaaaaaah ! I never do............do you really think that was my point Rjoh ? Deep, insightful lottery disscussion so far. LOL

Reply #1

RJOh — Fri, 24 Oct 2003 23:12:09 GMT

If you think QPs are a scam, pick your own.RJOh

Quick Pick Scam for the states ?

WIN D — Fri, 24 Oct 2003 23:02:47 GMT

Excuse me.......... Excuse me ?????? Ga. Midday Pick-4 Now ....OK ....that can happen .....Sure back to back straights ....that happens every Million years ......right? But who in their right mind would play the same number in exact order the very next day? NOBODY! So why was the pay out the first day so low.........compared to the 2nd. day's huge payout? QUICK PICKS...THATS WHY I really do believe that the states QP software is bias to... [ More ]