question for guru!!

Reply #47

Irvin — Mon, 01 Dec 2003 10:14:21 GMT

okay

Reply #46

Guru — Mon, 01 Dec 2003 10:00:45 GMT

Hi Irvin,Thanks. You'll receive the v1.5 and v1.6beta. not the v1.61 yet because there is till work to do on that one.

Reply #45

Irvin — Mon, 01 Dec 2003 09:32:57 GMT

Guru,I have finally done it....I have gone out and bought your system.....Had a few problems setting up my Paypal account but everything now looking good (The expanded card thing stuffed me up).As soon as I get my link via your email I'll fire it up and check it out.Will this give me your latest one available I think you said your upto v1.61?Well post picks here once I have it up and running properly.Regards,IrvinPS. This is my first piece of lotto software that I have bought.

Reply #44

vick — Mon, 01 Dec 2003 06:41:31 GMT

lucky we both use the same input, last 3 draws, the only other variable that the user can control is sample size, even then if underdog and i had the exact same inputs sample size i bet they would be different predictions with some overlap. It's random .

Reply #43

luckycat — Mon, 01 Dec 2003 02:45:48 GMT

thanks for all the above inputtrying to understand/ why vivk and underdog or iif had dif sync numbguru said yes possible vivk said same depens on input correct? thanks group

Reply #42

vick — Mon, 01 Dec 2003 01:21:27 GMT

lucky underdog and i both play our nations' [Canada] main lotto = canada 649 but i also play our states 649 seperate lotto, and yes my numbers are different than underdog's ! the program picks different numbers depending on input and sample size, there is some overlap though

Reply #41

underdog — Mon, 01 Dec 2003 00:04:13 GMT

oh come on luckycat its just a few guys joking and shooting the sh*t!!!! please do not take offense

Reply #40

luckycat — Sun, 30 Nov 2003 22:53:12 GMT

was there will rereadthanks again

Reply #39

Guru — Sun, 30 Nov 2003 22:51:28 GMT

Yes, it is possible luckycat. read the faq section on my website for more info on that www.lottosync.com

Reply #38

luckycat — Sun, 30 Nov 2003 22:49:41 GMT

thanks GURU looking forward to a maybe for the USA lottery> VIC k you say you won canada 649 UNDERDOG PREPOSTED HIS SYNC NUMBERS FOR CANADA AND DID NOT WIN ANYTHING. Tthat might mean that you both got dif sinc numbers??if so is that possible? when youare both doing for the same game/place??maybe guru will see this post and answer. green bucks to you

Reply #37

Guru — Sun, 30 Nov 2003 22:43:05 GMT

Cool to hear you won Vick.The guy from NY that won 2 times in a row 4 correct mailed me again last night. He won 4 correct for the 3rd time in only 4 tries.

Reply #36

Guru — Sun, 30 Nov 2003 22:35:12 GMT

Luckycat:I'm really doing kinda like a million things at the same time already.When I find the time, I will, but I can't promise.

Reply #35

vick — Sun, 30 Nov 2003 22:35:09 GMT

Quote: O

Reply #34

luckycat — Sun, 30 Nov 2003 22:31:37 GMT

I have a question for you GURUthere is a Mr. donahue that predicted pic3 in may for 1 weekand hit straight for all 6 days.. it was free to prove his visions.Underdog has preposted his canada 6/49 to prove your sinc system freeI asked him to prepost for OHIO to prove your system 6/49 gameOHIOHe said to ask YOU.SO is it possible for u to give USA a freebe in america to prove your sync ssystem can u pprepost a american game?????thanks in advance/ but I dont' really expect you to do th... [ More ]

Reply #33

luckycat — Sun, 30 Nov 2003 22:26:02 GMT

guru:wash your mouth out.no excuses. be nice.once might be excused/ but you delibertly did x this site. 2 timestalk t o your wife/ mother/or sister.see how they like your language. are you going to talk about lottery here

Reply #32

Guru — Sun, 30 Nov 2003 22:15:20 GMT

sorry luckycat, male hormones you know. ok, back to tits and bytes.sorry, bits and bytes.

Reply #31

Guru — Sun, 30 Nov 2003 21:12:11 GMT

and, you know what is best abo

Reply #30

underdog — Sun, 30 Nov 2003 20:52:45 GMT

lol! my fiance thinks a hard dick is better than a floppy dick maybe give your computer some viagra!!!! lol! lol

Reply #29

Guru — Sun, 30 Nov 2003 20:47:57 GMT

uh. do you mean temp hard d

Reply #28

vick — Sun, 30 Nov 2003 16:50:06 GMT

Hi Guru, do think it's best to close and then reopen the lotto synch program after doing a prediction and then starting another - i'm thinking as not to let the past predictions get mixed up in any kind of way with the new predictions, ie closing/reopening lotto synch clears temp memory and temp hard dick data etc etc?? Thanks

Reply #27

Guru — Sun, 30 Nov 2003 08:51:44 GMT

The exact order of all balls is not needed. It is helpfull to know everytime wich ball rolled out as last though.

Reply #26

plumbusa — Sun, 30 Nov 2003 05:05:04 GMT

Hey Guru, do you think it is important to input data from the draw as it comes out of the drum, i.e.=1 49 25 8 17 36. Or does it matter

Reply #25

luckycat — Thu, 27 Nov 2003 02:38:40 GMT

guru;CAN U ANSWER my previous post questions to you> can it do 6/49 game?also read ur site:how much is it usa money?and what does the 12.50 mean?thanks> a thought> if many people use the sync system and all play the 6/49 game/ with useing the last 3 draws. would you say all the people or even if 2 have it, will have the same identical numbers. yo play?I think it would have to be so

Reply #24

lottoking — Thu, 27 Nov 2003 02:23:32 GMT

oh ok gurumaybe we can talk about lotto pattern laterand maybe we could learn from each otherlottoking

Reply #23

Guru — Wed, 26 Nov 2003 21:41:33 GMT

Randomness is a self evolving natural system that creates unlimited new structures out of past structures with a tendency to form quasi stable connections between similar source situations and outcomes over time, not by accident, but by the play of subtle and complex natural rules.marco,

Reply #22

Guru — Wed, 26 Nov 2003 20:56:49 GMT

LottoSyncronizer always uses the 3 most recent draws. no more, no less.Draws further away than 3 lose their power of influencing the current random flow. (think about the numbers as being multiple magnets repelling and attracting each other in very complex ways. The further you move the magnets away from each other, the weaker their interactive forces become) Remember the soft does no statistical analysis of a past draw database, it tries to read the current position(s) in random space for you... [ More ]

Reply #21

T1205 — Wed, 26 Nov 2003 16:45:03 GMT

Guru;What is the least amount of draws that you can use. (I have not check all of the post to know). Will the program work with just, let say 12 to 15 draws from the past. #2, can you make up a data base of past draws of your choosing ? Meaning; taking 3 draws from last week and then 3 or 4 draws from the week before that ? Just thinking outside the box .

Reply #20

Guru — Wed, 26 Nov 2003 15:35:14 GMT

Lottoking:I really don't want to start a discussion on what is the best method again, nor do I want to start another challenge (I already have plenty of challenges to fill my spare time with !). If you have faith in the power of your method, then you should play with it. I agree that it all starts with a positive aproach, and lots of enthusiasm.

Reply #19

lottoking — Wed, 26 Nov 2003 12:24:27 GMT

Saying something doesn't work, is definetely easier than making something workguru,if you say I just say something that doesn't work,you are wrong and I have to give you a challenge.would you accept it?lets predict a kind of super lotto and see whose prediction wins the winning number with the least tickets and the shortest time.Do you take it????????yo use your machine and i use my headlottoking

Reply #18

lottoking — Wed, 26 Nov 2003 12:13:43 GMT

I DO NOT understand your system,but how could you prove it really works?can you get the winning number within 10 times

Reply #17

luckycat — Wed, 26 Nov 2003 06:26:19 GMT

GURU:CAN UR SYNC PRED FOR 6/49 game in usa?our game is wed pm aand sat pm?is any members trying for the games in usa?sure wish u success this time around/ sounds good

Reply #16

Guru — Wed, 26 Nov 2003 06:11:23 GMT

don't sell crap you don't know anything about lottokingSaying something doesn't work, is definetely easier than making something work

Reply #15

lottoking — Wed, 26 Nov 2003 05:04:19 GMT

Never the most accurate numners could be predicted unless you could predict for real.You cant relay your accurate prediction on analysing past winning numbers.And more tries couldn't guarantee your average to win 6 out of 10 because its not alread yet before the final draw.May be too late before you realsied you have made a wrong choice to be on the wrong track to the only winning number

Reply #14

vick — Tue, 25 Nov 2003 18:44:31 GMT

Guru i jst finished running another 6/49 pediction at 400 sample EXCEPT this time i set the Lotto program to High CPU usuage and didn't use the computer for other things this time only 56 minutes !!!!!! Much faster , i think the 1000 sample can be faster to cause i left alot of other programs opened when i did it. I'll try tonight.

Reply #13

Guru — Tue, 25 Nov 2003 17:28:54 GMT

We use a few Amd Athlon computers of the same speed with 1 gig mem in our renderfarm. My predictions are a bit faster, but that is normal since we are doing it for a 6/42 lotto. I think 7 hours at 1000 samples for a 6/49 lotto is a very normal time.

Reply #12

vick — Tue, 25 Nov 2003 14:49:01 GMT

Excalber i just started using the program, we will see what happens in the future, GoodLuck.Bop i have an Amd athlon XP 2500+ , 1 GB mem fast Wd 80 8 mb hard drive, win XP = plenty fast for me and takes about 3 hours [i was using the computer at the same time so unattended it might have been faster] using minimal settings in a 6/49 game, i also did using bigger settings, for instance i just finished a 1000 samples settings and let it run overnite and it took about 7 hours [ i turn off screen s... [ More ]

Reply #11

Guru — Tue, 25 Nov 2003 07:23:43 GMT

Vick:Are you already using the 1.6 beta version ?? This is way faster then the 1.5.If not, send me an email with your order id number and you will receive your upgrade.

Reply #10

BobP — Tue, 25 Nov 2003 06:57:18 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by vick on November 25, 2003 Bob i know about back-testing and plan on doing it but the program takes litterally hours to predict using the minimal settings, so takes time, but soon. Interesting, every program has its needs to run at its best. Just curious what processor and memory amount are you running? Is windows cranking the drive writing memory to disk or just taking the time to chew through the possibilities? BobP

Reply #9

Guru — Tue, 25 Nov 2003 06:30:42 GMT

Hi,About the numbers repeating in 2 prediction runs:Yes in some cases they are more likely to appear than those numbers that only come up once. This is however not always the case.

Reply #8

EXCALIBUR — Tue, 25 Nov 2003 05:24:57 GMT

Vick,HiJust a question.How, have you done with the program so far,has it given you any winning numbers yet

Reply #7

vick — Tue, 25 Nov 2003 04:10:45 GMT

Bob i know about back-testing and plan on doing it but the program takes litterally hours to predict using the minimal settings, so takes time, but soon.

Reply #6

underdog — Tue, 25 Nov 2003 03:56:05 GMT

thats true we could enter the past results to see how we would have done if we were in that time frame! cool suggestion

Reply #5

BobP — Tue, 25 Nov 2003 03:40:59 GMT

Doesn't your lottery have hundreds of past draws you already know the answer to you can test these questions against? BobP

Reply #4

vick — Tue, 25 Nov 2003 00:39:18 GMT

I also have a few questions for Guru, when the 10 number predictions are being made, are the 1st numbers picked MORE important or CARRY more weight the the last picked numbers, because if so they can be put into a FRONT-Loaded wheel which puts more emphasis on this 1st numbers??? However when the program finishes it automatically sorts them, i have been watching the EXACT order it predicts them. Also, can perhaps future program Upgrades include a type of Batch feature to say for example. ok run

Reply #3

vick — Tue, 25 Nov 2003 00:30:21 GMT

I would personally concentrate on the repeated 4 numbers and use them as 4-fixed-Bankers in a a full 49 wheel ! which is always = 990 tickets then filter them down etc etc or pick another banker then play the Lotto 649 5 numbers slip with all 49 for $44 then i would also play the 2 original 10's by themselves in 10 wheels then do the 16 wheelIt's worth a shot under dog, here's some 16 number wheels for you to try on this page =www.lotto-logix.com/wheeling.html ps. i have a BUNCH more wheels i've... [ More ]

Reply #2

underdog — Tue, 25 Nov 2003 00:25:26 GMT

thats correct the second prediction has a few repeats from the first

Reply #1

vick — Mon, 24 Nov 2003 23:52:49 GMT

do you mean that you get 16 individual numbers from the 20 with 4 repeats. But then you'd have a pool of 16 numbers which is MUCH larger than the original 10

question for guru!!

underdog — Mon, 24 Nov 2003 23:50:18 GMT

hi guru i have a simple but could be profitable question i see if i run the prediction software twice i usually end up with around 16 individual numbers to play do you think i would increase my chances of getting the 6 correct numbers as double the prediction might increase it