<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Is lottosync any good?</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/77738" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Is lottosync any good?</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #19</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/156868</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/156868</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2003 14:22:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>softstor</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Can the Irish Lotto be played online</p>]]></description>
			<category>softstor</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #18</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/155670</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/155670</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2003 13:03:44 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>spock</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I have run lottosync twice on irish lotto 6/42and it has got 5 of the 6 out of 17 numbers it pcked??   Run it on UK 7/27 got 3 right you need 4 to win..</p>]]></description>
			<category>spock</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #17</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/155659</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/155659</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2003 12:21:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>paul762</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>hi all, i think that if this lottosync was any good why would there be all the need for this sampling different numbers surely it would be one sample number would be best for say 6/49 and another would be best for say 5/42 or whatever reading all the posts about it it all just seems too hit and miss and also why 10 numbers if it was that good you would only need 6 it could be that its in a very early development stage and that they plan more accurate versions later on and of course it will cost</p>]]></description>
			<category>paul762</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #16</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/155481</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/155481</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2003 01:49:14 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>vick</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>BobP the program doesn&#x27;t ignore bonus balls, in fact in 649 games it RELY&#x27;s on the bonus ball for the 2nd line input</p>]]></description>
			<category>vick</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #15</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/155358</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/155358</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2003 19:06:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>underdog</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I think you are using too many samples i hit 5 numbers in my group of 10 using a sample size of just 400 and my game is 6/49 try it and see if it works better</p>]]></description>
			<category>underdog</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #14</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/155352</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/155352</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2003 18:47:29 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>spock</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Used 1000 samples got one number right..not agood result</p>]]></description>
			<category>spock</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #13</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/155147</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/155147</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2003 03:14:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>BobP</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Quote: Originally posted by Irvin on December 12, 2003 There was one back test I did with different variations to the results (sorted, unsorted, with bonus, without bonus) and I had 6 different groups of 10 numbers with 1 or 2 numbers repeated between groups.I intend on using this system with one of the ideas listed on lotto logix web site.If I&#x27;m reading the help file right, the program ignores bonus balls whether you enter them or not.  Since smaller field size games tend to have more repeats f... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/155147">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>BobP</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #12</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/155102</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/155102</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2003 01:24:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Irvin</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Quote: Originally posted by Irvin on December 12, 2003There was one back test I did with different variations to the results (sorted, unsorted, with bonus, without bonus) and I had 6 different groups of 10 numbers with 1 or 2 numbers repeated between groups.There is also an  X  mark you can click above the last drawn number.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Irvin</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #11</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/155100</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/155100</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2003 01:21:18 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>BobP</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Quote: Originally posted by vick on December 12, 2003 BopP i asked Guru that exact same question, re: should i reboot computer after every prediction cause of memory affects etc and he explained that no, it&#x27;s designed to run that way, see the topic called  question for guru!! I&#x27;m not suggesting exiting and restarting LottoSync to speed up the process, only that it is possible to stop and restart as the program allows if necessary such as not wanting to leave the house or going to sleep with the... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/155100">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>BobP</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #10</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/155053</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/155053</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2003 20:35:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>paul762</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>thansk alot guys, irvin have you tried sampling eg. 40 number draw=400 or 49 number draw=490 etc. also i noticed on their website that the 3 example draws were all listed in numerical order so is it possible to input the numbers in drawn order and if so does this make any difference? like i say im not purchasing until early feb because of the updates due but it seems that it might be something plausible.best of luck allpaul.</p>]]></description>
			<category>paul762</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #9</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/155039</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/155039</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2003 18:26:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Irvin</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#x27;m still back testing.They have always answered any questions I send them.I have a 1.8GHz PC and only have to pick from 40 numbers.This has taken on avg 3 hrs with sample size set to 1000.There was one back test I did with different variations to the results (sorted, unsorted, with bonus, without bonus) and I had 6 different groups of 10 numbers with 1 or 2 numbers repeated between groups.With this particular test I noticed that if you took all the numbers from the groups it covered and only li... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/155039">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Irvin</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #8</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/155035</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/155035</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2003 18:16:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>EXCALIBUR</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>maybe I should not say this,but since you asked here it goes:I think that the program generates random numbers in the range specified by the particular lottery game and at the same time that it does this,( it&#x27;s a secret Sorry) and I would tell You the rest of the story, but I think that GURU would like to keep it a secret so I won&#x27;t .But I will try to answer your question anyway, but I might be wrong.I think that the sample rate is how many times it rescans for (I won&#x27;t tell you what, it&#x27;s a sec... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/155035">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>EXCALIBUR</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #7</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/155023</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/155023</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:05:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>vick</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>time will tell paul - stay tuned</p>]]></description>
			<category>vick</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #6</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/154903</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/154903</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2003 08:37:18 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>paul762</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>thanks guys, i think i might wait until the newer version arrives as i also enjoy the occasional keno game i think it is due at the end of january i dont know whether there will be any improvements to the first version etc. so what is your overall verdict of the software? is it the best software you have for prediction purposes?thanks</p>]]></description>
			<category>paul762</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/154892</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/154892</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2003 06:32:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>vick</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>BopP i asked Guru that exact same question, re: should i reboot computer after every prediction cause of memory affects etc and he explained that no, it&#x27;s designed to run that way, see the topic called  question for guru</p>]]></description>
			<category>vick</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/154878</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/154878</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2003 04:47:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>BobP</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Quote: Originally posted by paul762 on December 11, 2003 I tried mailing a few questions to them but they havent emailed back yet eg. what is the sampling all about? 400 800 1000 etc. and is there a specific sampling number for a particular lotto eg 400 for 6/49 etc. also i only run a 1.6ghz pc so how long would it take to predict numbers?thankspaulThe jury is still out, the program is still in beta, stay tuned.I&#x27;m only guessing with no information what-so-ever . . . the program is looking at th... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/154878">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>BobP</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/154823</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/154823</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2003 01:53:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>vick</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Guru can explain that best but in general the larger the sample the more accurate the prediction, according to the documnetation, but too large or too small a sample is not good , so it&#x27;s kinda a see what fits best thing.In general i fund that the larger ball count increase prediction time more that the larger sample size. Example a 49 ball game at 650 sample might make quicker predictions than a 60 ball 400 sample game. Goodluck</p>]]></description>
			<category>vick</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/154768</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/154768</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2003 21:34:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>paul762</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>thanks vick but what does sample mean? eg. 650 sample etc.</p>]]></description>
			<category>paul762</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/154730</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738/154730</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2003 19:58:39 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>vick</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Paul my p4 3.0C-GHZ + 1 Gb mem takes about 1 to 2 hours for a 650 sample of 1 649 preciction</p>]]></description>
			<category>vick</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Is lottosync any good?</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/77738</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2003 19:06:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>paul762</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I tried mailing a few questions to them but they havent emailed back yet eg. what is the sampling all about? 400 800 1000 etc. and is there a specific sampling number for a particular lotto eg 400 for 6/49 etc. also i only run a 1.6ghz pc so how long would it take to predict numbers?thankspaul</p>]]></description>
			<category>paul762</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

