2 Russian Scientist & Japan & pi

Reply #51

johnph77 — Wed, 31 Dec 2003 04:09:42 GMT

Ahhhhh, what the heck - since there are 8 cubes with 24 possible configurations and 12 cubes with 4 possible configurations, disregarding mechanical limitations I get ((24 x 24 x 24 x 24 x 24 x 24 x 24 x 24) = 110,075,314,176) x ((4 x 4 x 4 x 4 x 4 x 4 x 4 x 4 x 4 x 4 x 4 x 4) = 16,777,216) = 1,846,757,322,198,614,016 - 1.8 quintillion possibilities.HNY, a - gl

Reply #50

Prometheus1 — Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:57:07 GMT

LOL Good man Win d . You are very right. Hope you emptied your mail box. I have what we talked about ready to go. Let me know asap so I can re-send... p.s. that was just in case someone fell asleep before they got to the end. LOL

Reply #49

WIN D — Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:46:16 GMT

Prometheus, don't you mean, what's 895,833,333,333,333,333 among friends? (quadrillion is redundant) LOL

Reply #48

Prometheus1 — Tue, 30 Dec 2003 17:42:17 GMT

Johnpm77, 895,833,333,333,333,333 Isn't it about 43 quintillion divided by 48 or just under a quintillion. What the heck ....what's 895,833,333,333,333,333 quadrillion among friends? This is not an exact answer, because some patterns exhibit symmetry, and do not actually have 48 distinct representations. I suspect the exact calculation entails the use of the Bernside Polya counting theorem, but it's been a long time since I took combinator... [ More ]

Reply #47

goose — Tue, 30 Dec 2003 08:30:19 GMT

you can have a different view with a wheeling system concept.

Reply #46

johnph77 — Tue, 30 Dec 2003 07:24:17 GMT

Thought about it after I posted. Here's where I erred.The cubes on the edge show two faces at the same time and have but four orientations. That math stands. But the corner cubes have six exposable faces. Think of them as dice, with each color representing a specific number. If one color (assume it represents the number 1) is in a specific position then there are four different possible orientations on the cube as the cube is rotated on the 1-6 axis - 1-2-3, 1-3-5, 1-5-4 and 1-4-2. The color rep... [ More ]

Reply #45

MrSteel01 — Tue, 30 Dec 2003 00:03:20 GMT

Rubik cube!color=#0000ffBRubik s/B online Home Page IMG height=12 alt=icon src= http://aolsearch.aol.com/gr/pw.gif > - ... Solving the Cube! Rubik's Club. Rubik's Cube. Try online Rubik's Challenges! ... Try online Rubik's Challenges! Where to buy? FAQ and Cube info. Rubik's Promotion. ...http://www.rubiks.com/ask them

Reply #44

JAP69 — Mon, 29 Dec 2003 20:40:29 GMT

with 6 faces and 6 colors and a mix of 6 colors on each side with 9 squares not placed in the same color order each time on the 6 faces. How would you calculate that. I am not into math.

Reply #43

hypersoniq — Mon, 29 Dec 2003 20:09:39 GMT

each edge piece has 2 exposed sides (colored stickers) and each corner has 3...8 corners = 24 faces12 edges = 24 faceswith the 6 fixed faces, that's 54 exposed faces (when solved there are 6 sides x 9 color stickers = 54 exposed faces)so the number should be even lower...

Reply #42

johnph77 — Mon, 29 Dec 2003 19:33:09 GMT

I'd read the lengthy explanation of the 43 trillion number of available combinations in Rubik's cube a long time ago and I've always questioned the method used to derive that number. It doesn't compute.Each cube has 26 exposed cubes, of which 6 are fixed (only one side is and can be exposed), leaving 20 movable cubes. Of these 20 movable cubes, 8 are on the corners and 12 are on the edge. The 8 cubes on the corners each have 6 sides that can be exposed. 6 x 6 x 6 x 6 x 6 x 6 x 6 x 6 = 1,679,616.... [ More ]

Reply #41

goose — Mon, 29 Dec 2003 10:00:21 GMT

thats better

Reply #40

Guru — Mon, 29 Dec 2003 09:29:49 GMT

oops,indeed, I was mistaking on the inventor of the Rubik cube . A Belgian invented a similar puzzle game (don't remember the name) but not the Rubik cube. Sorry. I'm not a Game specialist.

Reply #39

goose — Mon, 29 Dec 2003 08:49:45 GMT

I dont think our guru even knows what he is talking about.........

Reply #38

MrSteel01 — Mon, 29 Dec 2003 08:42:16 GMT

Quote

Reply #37

goose — Sun, 28 Dec 2003 07:56:58 GMT

Sheldrake suggests that our minds are not limited to our brains, but rather stretch outward to touch the beings and objects that we perceive.Once this extended influence of the mind is taken into consideration, many puzzling phenomena begin to make sense, including telepathy and phantom limbs. sounds more like parapsychology . I am insterested in and studied that before~..

Reply #36

goose — Sun, 28 Dec 2003 07:53:18 GMT

believe that the market is neither unpredictable nor random, that patterns lie buried in the mass of data that daily gushes forthbtw anyone heard of magic 216 numbers from God?I have that 216 number but dont know how to use it to crack lotto.

Reply #35

Millennium — Sat, 27 Dec 2003 15:08:35 GMT

Quote

Reply #34

Guru — Sat, 27 Dec 2003 12:46:10 GMT

About the Rubik cube

Reply #33

goose — Sat, 27 Dec 2003 07:50:49 GMT

alright man good luck..bye

Reply #32

goose — Fri, 26 Dec 2003 12:47:09 GMT

you know accurate prediction,right ?guru.so if you have to choose from 1 and 2 which are the same 50 chance,how could you make a choice

Reply #31

goose — Fri, 26 Dec 2003 12:06:16 GMT

tell me your theories,guru,,,,,,,,,,,

Reply #30

MrSteel01 — Fri, 26 Dec 2003 11:47:13 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by goose on December 26, 2003 these aretheories? anyway.I am waitting for your news anytime gurugooseIthink guru is going to goose goose! New subject! How to prdvent mosquito bites pi x's what

Reply #29

goose — Fri, 26 Dec 2003 11:02:44 GMT

these are theories anyway.I am waitting for your news anytime gurugoose

Reply #28

MrSteel01 — Fri, 26 Dec 2003 08:54:56 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Guru on December 25, 2003 The human brain IS CHAOS, but it was not designed to understand the workings of itself.Marco,The Rubik's Cube is a six color cube made up of 9 squares of each color on each face. According to the Official Rubik s Cube website, there are 43,252,003,274,489,000 different possible configuations, but only one of these configurations presents the 'solved' CubeTHIS ONE'S FOR YOU! GURU

Reply #27

MrSteel01 — Fri, 26 Dec 2003 07:41:38 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Guru gone mad on December 25, 2003 From Publishers WeeklyStrogatz is a Cornell mathematician and pioneer of the science of synchrony, which brings mathematics, physics and biology to bear on the mystery of how spontaneous order occurs at every level of the cosmos, from the nucleus on up. In this eminently accessible and entertaining book, Strogatz explores the mysterious synchrony achieved by fireflies that flash in unison by the thousands, and the question of what ma... [ More ]

Reply #26

Guru — Thu, 25 Dec 2003 23:29:42 GMT

The human brain IS CHAOS, but it was not designed to understand the workings of itself.Marco,

Reply #25

Guru — Thu, 25 Dec 2003 23:19:01 GMT

Another interesting work is flatland, a romance of many dimensions by Edwin Abbotta good work to understand how 2 dimensional creatures interpret a 3 dimensional world.This allows you to think about how we 3 dimensional beings only perceive and understand very little about higher dimensions.

Reply #24

Guru — Thu, 25 Dec 2003 22:52:17 GMT

don't try to solve the random problem with mathematical algorithms only.these algorithms only provide the same (simmilar) order, without providing a solution. One has to look beyond that to understand what is really happening.I'm not claiming to be smarter than Strogatz, Feynman or Einstein ofcourse.I just narrowed my field of reseach to lotto draws and numerical random order.

Reply #23

Guru — Thu, 25 Dec 2003 22:47:01 GMT

Believe me. There is a perfect spontanuous and natural order in lotto outcomes. And I'm very very close to finding the solution.But very very close is still a degree of error too large for matching 3,4,5 or 6 numbers always.However, I'm still making progress. I will search till I find that flawless method.dedication and persistence are the key.

Reply #22

Guru — Thu, 25 Dec 2003 22:37:50 GMT

I found my thoughs on the universe and it's working reflected in this book.The name LottoSync emerged in my mind before I read the book. I guess that's synchrony.

Reply #21

Guru — Thu, 25 Dec 2003 22:33:28 GMT

From Publishers WeeklyStrogatz is a Cornell mathematician and pioneer of the science of synchrony, which brings mathematics, physics and biology to bear on the mystery of how spontaneous order occurs at every level of the cosmos, from the nucleus on up. In this eminently accessible and entertaining book, Strogatz explores the mysterious synchrony achieved by fireflies that flash in unison by the thousands, and the question of what makes our own body clocks synchronize with night and day and even... [ More ]

Reply #20

Guru — Thu, 25 Dec 2003 22:28:26 GMT

One of the books I found very interesting on the subject was: Sync: The Emerging Science of Spontaneous Order from Steven Strogatz

Reply #19

Guru — Thu, 25 Dec 2003 22:14:29 GMT

I was not hiding. Just spend Christmas with my family.One has too live too, you know.I agree with millennium. Read about the subject, study it first. That's what I did the past years.Don't spit out hollow debunking thoughts when you don't know what you are talking about.

Reply #18

goose — Thu, 25 Dec 2003 13:48:14 GMT

where are you,guru?why do you hide

Reply #17

goose — Thu, 25 Dec 2003 09:23:29 GMT

we need another guru .......................

Reply #16

BobP — Wed, 24 Dec 2003 19:12:04 GMT

It should be obvious to all

Reply #15

Millennium — Wed, 24 Dec 2003 19:09:31 GMT

Some of you could do with some homework!Go to your local library and borrow Chaos by James Gleick.*Then* come back here and rebut -- because then you'll have *some* idea of the topic at hand.

Reply #14

MrSteel01 — Wed, 24 Dec 2003 18:54:11 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Guru on December 24, 2003 The problem with many scientists is that they are afraid to ruin their carreersThe had a 9-5 Job this was done on their own time with their own computer! if they peddle too much in the opposite direction of what is commonly accepted bythe scientific world.Scientific world is not a commonly known to all it is hit miss or guess to make itwork

Reply #13

RJOh — Wed, 24 Dec 2003 17:02:12 GMT

The day someone at Lottery Post wins a big jackpot, I doubt if they will give a second thought to how they picked the winner. I know of only one person that did, he was a local car dealer who bought lottery tickets for his customers and his crew at the dealerships and after he and a pool of his crew won and split the winnings, he started buying tickets for a pool of one(himself), won again, sold his dealership and moved to Florida.RJOh

Reply #12

goose — Wed, 24 Dec 2003 16:01:34 GMT

lets work hard and make that day come soon

Reply #11

hypersoniq — Wed, 24 Dec 2003 15:48:06 GMT

The only useless theories are the proprietary ones ;-)Theories are just the beginning, they exist to be proven (or disproven).

Reply #10

goose — Wed, 24 Dec 2003 15:45:11 GMT

I think 0-9 are basic number to determine how a winner really comes from.we dont mess it up with time.the winning numbersare just complicated expression of basic numbers combos.

Reply #9

Guru — Wed, 24 Dec 2003 15:33:42 GMT

Jazzy:All great things come from theories and speculations.Einstein's speculations and theories proved to be correct. Although nobody believed him at first.You say I don't think so I say I do think so (study the subject first, then draw your conclusions

Reply #8

goose — Wed, 24 Dec 2003 15:20:08 GMT

ok,we dont talk about the real cause.Now we focus time.the cumulation of the infinite past, present and future existing in an eternal now moment.This theory is one of the theories to explain nowadays world.I know this theory from the brief history of time.It says that the past,present,and the future of our lives,as well as all the movements of the matter are like diamonds on a necklace.Its doomed to happen.But we never know whats going to happen.Back to lottery,If your system could explain or pr... [ More ]

Reply #7

goose — Wed, 24 Dec 2003 14:59:00 GMT

I know that time is just an illusion.For some real scientist,They have no concept of time.This is what I could understand.Sometimes the illusion set us traps.Once our thought got trapped,its very hard to get rid of it.Just like in ancient times,people all belive in false truth.You have emphasize real cause and the effect ,If we conside the winner as the effect,can you tell us whats the real cause regardless of time effect?Another point you made : cause and effect could as well be inverted.Mean... [ More ]

Reply #6

Guru — Wed, 24 Dec 2003 12:37:01 GMT

goose.if you have a tree, and leaves are falling down from it.Normally we would say it is the initial position of the leaf on the tree together with the wind and gravity that will determine the landing spot of this leaf when it drops.Now the wind is the variable value, and is seen as the cause. The landing spot is the effect.But, if you consider a universe according to einsteins relativity theory where time is not progressing linear or where time is just an inexistent illusion, then cause and ef... [ More ]

Reply #5

goose — Wed, 24 Dec 2003 11:34:01 GMT

obviously you refused my question......

Reply #4

goose — Wed, 24 Dec 2003 11:06:12 GMT

So you are telling meall random behavior are destinied to happen at at that fixed time?,like we belive in such fate and love at first sight

Reply #3

Guru — Wed, 24 Dec 2003 10:53:36 GMT

The problem with many scientists is that they are afraid to ruin their carreers if they peddle too much in the opposite direction of what is commonly accepted by the scientific world.

Reply #2

Guru — Wed, 24 Dec 2003 10:49:26 GMT

Goose:I don't agree. I have strong proof at hand that all systems that show random behaviour will dventually be recognized as deterministic systems, thus predictable. It is just a matter of time and computing power. But it will be done.

Reply #1

goose — Wed, 24 Dec 2003 08:17:55 GMT

So theres no such thing to be figured out absoluateacurate but near prefection.......No perfection!Lottery can never be predicted accurately..Its so stupid a idear to crack it completely.We learnt the lesson again and again.Its time to wake up

2 Russian Scientist & Japan & pi

MrSteel01 — Wed, 24 Dec 2003 07:56:41 GMT

What do they have in common They tried to brake down pi.Pi py , is the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter. This ratio is the same for every circle and is approximately 3.14159.But the 2 Russian Computer Scientist Japan's most powerful computer could not break down pi the story goes. That the 2 Russian Scientist's who aftery working 9 to 5 came back to their appartmennt and cranked up IBM Computer and spit out millions of numbers that did not come close to pi in a repeat... [ More ]