Lotto Architect v2.2

Reply #86

lottoarchitect — Sun, 06 Jun 2004 15:24:46 GMT

The forum is active and runnin

Reply #85

emilyg — Wed, 02 Jun 2004 01:15:57 GMT

very nice site. look forward to using it soon.

Reply #84

LANTERN — Wed, 02 Jun 2004 00:37:41 GMT

Yes the forum is very nice, we'll use it soon.You can be sure that I am going to give your program a very good workout as soon as it's ready and you have a demo version ready.Thank you.

Reply #83

LANTERN — Wed, 02 Jun 2004 00:34:58 GMT

Yes the forum is very nice, we'll use it soon.Thank you.

Reply #82

lottoarchitect — Tue, 01 Jun 2004 21:00:01 GMT

The forum is open now. You can become a member if you wish so. I created it to support the users of the program at their first steps. There are some new systems and techniques that need mastering and I think a forum can well support this. You can also develop your own systems and discuss ideas among the members to achieve even better results.The development is almost finished. These days I work on the printing system which is the last major part of the program. The rest is tweaks here and there.... [ More ]

Reply #81

LANTERN — Tue, 01 Jun 2004 18:51:27 GMT

ApagogeasAre we getting there yet?A month or two more

Reply #80

lottoarchitect — Mon, 31 May 2004 19:07:47 GMT

I have added a forum page in t

Reply #79

lottoarchitect — Mon, 24 May 2004 01:38:07 GMT

True, the program originally created for Pick-5/6 games. The addition of Pick-3/4 games was on this version so normally there is room for improvement in many aspects. This includes new filters and other systems as well. I'll not add any new features at this version, I'll complete the program to be ready but it has more than enough to begin with. Your comments are a very good guide to have an idea what to add/change in the next version and also implement some of the very advanced systems possible... [ More ]

Reply #78

LANTERN — Mon, 24 May 2004 00:04:49 GMT

Pick-4 MasterLotto-Architect is also for the pick3 and 4, but for those games, it's isn't fully developed yet or at least I don't think that it is, but I am not sure, if and when and if you and me get a copy then we can test it for those games and give Apagogeas some feedback and have him make the needed changes to the program for a new update.Bye.

Reply #77

Pick-4_Master — Sun, 23 May 2004 23:48:27 GMT

True no program will have everything you need but there are some that have more than enough to work with P34Lotto is a perfect example.To answer your question BobP Lotto-Architect is for the Pick-5/6 games while P34Lotto is not I have programs that I use specifically for each game format.Unless I missed something and he did include Pick-3/4 in Lotto-Architect I would still get it based on it's analysis features.P34Lotto isn't missing anything as far as I'm concerned if a program doesn't have ev... [ More ]

Reply #76

LANTERN — Sun, 23 May 2004 23:36:10 GMT

BobPOn Pick-4_Master's advice I tried and used P34Lotto and just as he said, it is good, very good and yet it does not have all the filters that I need and want, as far as I know there is no program anywhere that has all the filtersas I want them and for the uses that I give to them or in the way that I use them, yes no program made by anybody anywhere for the pick3, but again, I know some uses for some filters that nobody ever thought about, also I myself have discovered some filters, but almos... [ More ]

Reply #75

BobP — Sun, 23 May 2004 21:22:36 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Pick-4_Master on May 23, 2004There's no reason to walk away from P34Lotto it's one of the best programs out there in my opinion to play the Daily games besides Versabet 3/4 and LottoMan if these programs aren't working for you than you probably should develop something for yourself that you can use.Like I said the tools are there it's up to us the Players to make it work for that hit.I've done it so can you guys I've hit 3 times using P34Lotto it has excellent... [ More ]

Reply #74

Pick-4_Master — Sun, 23 May 2004 16:51:37 GMT

I play on a very tight budget so right now I can't play the way I should and I don't play everyday just like once or twice a week

Reply #73

Pick-4_Master — Sun, 23 May 2004 16:47:37 GMT

3 times in the past year and 2 times before that his other program Lotto-Hat is another excellent program I was able to hit 4 numbers in the Pick-5 using it.

Reply #72

Pick-4_Master — Sun, 23 May 2004 16:45:21 GMT

There's no reason to walk away from P34Lotto it's one of the best programs out there in my opinion to play the Daily games besides Versabet 3/4 and LottoMan if these programs aren't working for you than you probably should develop something for yourself that you can use.Like I said the tools are there it's up to us the Players to make it work for that hit.I've done it so can you guys I've hit 3 times using P34Lotto it has excellent analysis and wheeling features.... [ More ]

Reply #71

Pick-4_Master — Sun, 23 May 2004 16:41:33 GMT

I tested it on paper to see if it could be done so for now I go for the 3 and 4 number hits that cost 20 bucks to play the jackpot will require more combo's than thatthe results I got was 3 number hits, 4 number hits than a 5 of 5 hit.As long as I correctly select the numbers to wheel and filters to apply a Jackpot hit can be achieved.It's all about the player and his selections and ability to use the software effectively.The software can't do it for you alone if your good at picking a group of... [ More ]

Reply #70

RJOh — Sun, 23 May 2004 07:01:17 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on May 20, 2004Quote: Originally posted by Pick-4_Master on May 20, 2004Limited funds kept me from hitting in the Pick-5 and 6 games you need to spend a lot more money than you would in the Pick-3/4.What amount of funds do you think is necessary to win a pick5 or pick6 game in a reasonable amount of time, if indeed you really think it can be done with lottery software. My thoughts are, there is no such amount.RJOhQuote: Originally posted by Pick-4_Master on May

Reply #69

BobP — Sun, 23 May 2004 05:54:34 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Pick-4_Master on May 22, 2004The amount for ME is $50-$60 dollars and I have tested it on paper so the amount for YOU might be less or much more RJOH but since you believe it can't be done then I guess no amount will work for you.I hit 4 of 5 spending $20 using Lotto-Hat I won $62.50 because 5 people won the jackpot I would have won a lot more if only 1 or 2 players hit.We have the tools people it's up to us to work with what we got and that's what I'm doing i... [ More ]

Reply #68

Pick-4_Master — Sat, 22 May 2004 21:05:43 GMT

The amount for ME is $50-$60 dollars and I have tested it on paper so the amount for YOU might be less or much more RJOH but since you believe it can't be done then I guess no amount will work for you.I hit 4 of 5 spending $20 using Lotto-Hat I won $62.50 because 5 people won the jackpot I would have won a lot more if only 1 or 2 players hit.We have the tools people it's up to us to work with what we got and that's what I'm doing instead of criticizing,complainingor asking for more than... [ More ]

Reply #67

lottoarchitect — Fri, 21 May 2004 12:02:33 GMT

Pick_4 Master, thanks for your support.BobP says If so which critical features are we still missing? . What is really missing is the ability to test the effectiveness of what you try to design. There are also other good tools to filter besides sums/odds/ranges etc.

Reply #66

BobP — Fri, 21 May 2004 04:45:11 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Pick-4_Master on May 20, 2004Lottery Software are Tools just like regular Computer Software if you don't know how to use it then it won't work for you the way you want it too.When I got my first program back in '97 I didn't know how to use it 4 yrs later I learned everything I could on my own and was able to hit numbers in the Daily games.Limited funds kept me from hitting in the Pick-5 and 6 games you need to spend a lot more money than you would in the Pick-3/4.Lott... [ More ]

Reply #65

RJOh — Fri, 21 May 2004 03:04:42 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Pick-4_Master on May 20, 2004Limited funds kept me from hitting in the Pick-5 and 6 games you need to spend a lot more money than you would in the Pick-3/4.What amount of funds do you think is necessary to win a pick5 or pick6 game in a reasonable amount of time, if indeed you really think it can be done with lottery software. My thoughts are, there is no such amount.RJOh

Reply #64

Pick-4_Master — Fri, 21 May 2004 02:16:59 GMT

Lottery Software are Tools just like regular Computer Software if you don't know how to use it then it won't work for you the way you want it too.When I got my first program back in '97 I didn't know how to use it 4 yrs later I learned everything I could on my own and was able to hit numbers in the Daily games.Limited funds kept me from hitting in the Pick-5 and 6 games you need to spend a lot more money than you would in the Pick-3/4.Lotto-Architect is definitely a program I will buy based on m... [ More ]

Reply #63

BobP — Thu, 20 May 2004 07:45:20 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by apagogeas on May 19, 2004Quote: Originally posted by BobP on May 19, 2004Stone soup theory has it everyone contributes the little they have and the result is a wonderful soup. Here not everyone contributes their best and the soup is weak.My uncle used to say, If you hang around with losers you'll be a loser too. This tells me we need some winners and we need them quick.It's easy to say words about sharing when not faced with the prospect of actually having to do it.... [ More ]

Reply #62

Colin F — Thu, 20 May 2004 06:08:02 GMT

Private Sub reprehensibleError()Dim writeLines For writeLines = 1 To 10 Debug.Print I will not make grammatical errors when Posting. Naughty Colin. Smack Smack Smack. NextEnd SubI will not make grammatical errors when Posting. Naughty Colin. Smack Smack Smack.I will not make grammatical errors when Posting. Naughty Colin. Smack Smack Smack.I will not make grammatical errors when Posting. Naughty Colin. Smack Smack Smack.I will not make grammatical errors when Posting. Naughty Coli... [ More ]

Reply #61

LANTERN — Thu, 20 May 2004 04:04:50 GMT

Dragon Wrote I do not believe that there is a pattern in Lotto draws. So putting a NN to the task is probably a waste of time. If Lotto draws were done by the same machine and balls every time, yes, I could imagine that patterns emerge. A NN would dventually detect those patterns. But when you switch machines, balls, etc, you certainly wont have the patterns that were looking for. If the draws are computer generated, its even more unlikely. I have heard thise same stuff from many people.So firs... [ More ]

Reply #60

dragon — Wed, 19 May 2004 23:26:15 GMT

Excuse me?It appears that there are a lot of people here that want input and dialog. I have been asked specifically by members of this forum to supply my thoughts on neural nets. So I started to. You dont like it? Dont read it!How exactly do you know how much or how little work I, or anyone else here, has done on any subject?And as I said quite clearly in the referenced post, there arent discernible patterns to detect. So why would I spend any time or work as you put it into detecting it? Who am... [ More ]

Reply #59

Colin F — Wed, 19 May 2004 22:33:59 GMT

DragonStop surmising. Do some work. If your genuinely interested in the subject put your undoubted but unapplied expertise to work. Waffling on about neural networks will get you nowhere.Blunt language - but someone's got to wake you up. You've told us a bit about your background. How, much of that expertise have you applied to actually analyzing Lotto Draws? Start with the fact that after about 500 draws most of the numbers have appeared about the same number of times.You can be a Professor, Do... [ More ]

Reply #58

Colin F — Wed, 19 May 2004 22:22:38 GMT

apagogeasThat's about the answer I expected and reminded me of why I've left you alone. I believe the majority of members and lookers are intelligent so I don't have a problem with anyone comparing what I posted with your drivel.Now, before you tuck yourself in of a night don't forget to stand in front of the mirror and blow kisses to yourself for ... let's see... half an hour, say.Enjoy yourselfColin

Reply #57

lottoarchitect — Wed, 19 May 2004 12:33:46 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Colin F on May 19, 2004Quote: Originally posted by apagogeas on May 18, 2004--------------------------------------------------------------------------------... no program can pick numbers by itself and win. This is becauseprediction is a very subjective matter and requires some interactionby the user. This is why lotto programs are considered tools and theyare not totally real prediction programs. As I said in another post,a fully automated program is not a desired on... [ More ]

Reply #56

lottoarchitect — Wed, 19 May 2004 11:56:38 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by BobP on May 19, 2004Stone soup theory has it everyone contributes the little they have and the result is a wonderful soup. Here not everyone contributes their best and the soup is weak.My uncle used to say, If you hang around with losers you'll be a loser too. This tells me we need some winners and we need them quick.It's easy to say words about sharing when not faced with the prospect of actually having to do it. If you really discovered something, were knocking o... [ More ]

Reply #55

Colin F — Wed, 19 May 2004 08:46:53 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by apagogeas on May 18, 2004--------------------------------------------------------------------------------... no program can pick numbers by itself and win. This is becauseprediction is a very subjective matter and requires some interactionby the user. This is why lotto programs are considered tools and theyare not totally real prediction programs. As I said in another post,a fully automated program is not a desired one because it will dependsolely on the programmer's... [ More ]

Reply #54

RJOh — Wed, 19 May 2004 06:22:55 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by BobP on May 19, 2004My uncle used to say, If you hang around with losers you'll be a loser too. This tells me we need some winners and we need them quick. If you hang around with losers, you don't have to do much to look like a winner. Maybe that why all these guys selling a lottery program attract so much attention even though they haven't won a lottery either.RJOh

Reply #53

BobP — Wed, 19 May 2004 06:04:35 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on May 18, 2004Quote: Originally posted by BobP on May 18, 2004I can't speak for everyone else, but if I could pick winning lottery numbers on my own I wouldn't be hanging around here. My hope is that you have a better idea how to win then I have. Bob are you saying that if you had a clue to how to win a lottery, you wouldn't be hanging around the Post sharing your knowledge? What make you hope that someone else may come hear with a better idea and share it? S... [ More ]

Reply #52

RJOh — Wed, 19 May 2004 00:04:11 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by BobP on May 18, 2004I can't speak for everyone else, but if I could pick winning lottery numbers on my own I wouldn't be hanging around here. My hope is that you have a better idea how to win then I have. Bob are you saying that if you had a clue to how to win a lottery, you wouldn't be hanging around the Post sharing your knowledge? What make you hope that someone else may come hear with a better idea and share it? So far nobody here have said I won a lottery jack... [ More ]

Reply #51

LANTERN — Tue, 18 May 2004 23:18:42 GMT

ApagogeasI don't remember Guru's words, but he said that he wrote the program's code in such a way that anybody taking a look at his program's code could not make any sense out of it, another person who says that his programs are very well protected is Ion Saliu.So probably protecting a program against dissection and reverse engineering is the main priority.But almost nobody would probably bother to do any of this unless the program is really good.BobP has a question, several possible answers co... [ More ]

Reply #50

BobP — Tue, 18 May 2004 20:38:15 GMT

I can't speak for everyone else, but if I could pick winning lottery numbers on my own I wouldn't be hanging around here. My hope is that you have a better idea how to win then I have. Take the Gail Howard software. I can select the range of history to use from hundreds of choices. I can include up to 7 charts in the prediction process and assign a different weight factor to each. I can then choose how many numbers to wheel and select from a multitude of wheels with some filters. All in all... [ More ]

Reply #49

LANTERN — Tue, 18 May 2004 19:41:18 GMT

ApagogeasThe pictures of LottoSync Are being sent right know.You should get them in a few minutes.

Reply #48

lottoarchitect — Tue, 18 May 2004 19:31:42 GMT

Nice LANTERN

Reply #47

LANTERN — Tue, 18 May 2004 19:14:43 GMT

RJOhSSSS!Don't start to give Anastasios any such ideas.You are very bright, but stay quiet, don't spoil this.

Reply #46

RJOh — Tue, 18 May 2004 19:06:58 GMT

If a program can actually pick big winners in a reasonable amount of time, why would a programmer sell it at all? He could get rich by using it himself and once he was as rich as he wanted to be, sell it to someone else for millions$ and let them worry about the marketing risks if they didn't wish to use it to get richer themselves.

Reply #45

BobP — Tue, 18 May 2004 18:50:57 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by apagogeas on May 18, 2004LANTERN, Can you explain what Guru does for protection? Does he personally compiles an exe file for each user and then send it to each registered user by e-mail? It sounds like a good approach for protection. If I do that way, I'll possibly add only a demo version in the website so someone can test what the program is about and some features will not be available at all but this will be sufficient to understand what the program can do.You rece... [ More ]

Reply #44

lottoarchitect — Tue, 18 May 2004 17:50:11 GMT

LANTERN, Can you explain what Guru does for protection? Does he personally compiles an exe file for each user and then send it to each registered user by e-mail? It sounds like a good approach for protection. If I do that way, I'll possibly add only a demo version in the website so someone can test what the program is about and some features will not be available at all but this will be sufficient to understand what the program can do.

Reply #43

BobP — Tue, 18 May 2004 17:16:50 GMT

To avoid pirates the demo has to be independent of the program in such a way it cannot be converted to the complete program with a code or serial number.The same applies to buying a new license, otherwise there will be a crack made for the license code if they can't crack the program. ie: Attack the point of least resistance.With the above in mind, what would make sense would be for small upgrades and bug fixes to be free downloads that install themselves into the existing program. Larger upgr... [ More ]

Reply #42

LANTERN — Tue, 18 May 2004 17:07:06 GMT

If the program is as good as you say, then the price is O.K, the only thing is that:BobP said, Personally I would never buy a program that doesn't remain fully functional once I've paid for it. Oh I don't expect upgrades or fresh draw histories forever , but I do expect the thing to keep working .And I am afraid that he is very much right about this and that many people share this feeling, but of course also I do understand your points and position and you are also right.The first biggest pro... [ More ]

Reply #41

lottoarchitect — Tue, 18 May 2004 15:45:43 GMT

LANTERN, you are right about the trial version, I do worry about software piracy but on the other hand, I cannot demand someone to pay me and then give him the program. I work on an advanced system to safeguard the program from piracy somehow but possibly this will not be done in this version.About the $250 once-payment and upgrades for eg $25, I still believe it is not a good idea and I'll explain why. The program at its current version contains the core systems to let it function as expected.... [ More ]

Reply #40

LANTERN — Tue, 18 May 2004 14:57:16 GMT

BobPIt seems to me then that apagogeas might try predicting a little and posting the numbers for a U.S. lottery, so people can see how well his program works, but that should not be needed, because he said that there will be a trial version, but I think that if his program works and works good then there should be the option if somebody wants to use it, of buying the program for the $250 or whatever and as to updates, either free or the next one free and a $25 to $50 charge or whatever per updat... [ More ]

Reply #39

BobP — Mon, 17 May 2004 18:00:00 GMT

I wasn't trying to be harsh, only matter of fact. I have a large collection of lottery software and systems and yet it is my cat that has apparently won a lottery where one wins a furnished home, food and servants for life, anyone know how to enter this cat lottery?If tomorrow I were to develop and start selling a lottery system, what would you accept as proof of its value? At least proof enough to get you to buy a copy for, ah let's say $250. U.S.? What would you expect me to show you seeing... [ More ]

Reply #38

spock — Mon, 17 May 2004 17:54:56 GMT

Sounds fair enough

Reply #37

lottoarchitect — Mon, 17 May 2004 12:32:38 GMT

reddog BobP, you use harsh comments for something you haven't seen yet. I'll not reply in the same manner, I'll simply try to explain why I've chosen this price plan as it seems your arguments/comments are solery based on the price of the program.Well, the program worths a lot of money. I value it to worth up to $250 or more compared to other software available. The reason for this is that it has features that you never had the chance to use anywhere and there are still more to come. So, I don... [ More ]

Reply #36

BobP — Mon, 17 May 2004 05:06:40 GMT

There were some prices in the FAQ suggesting the program will be leased for six months or a year.Personally I would never buy a program that doesn't remain fully functional once I've paid for it. Oh I don't expect upgrades or fresh draw histories forever, but I do expect the thing to keep working. Researching lottery games means keeping antique lottery software around sometimes for a single chart or feature, wouldn't be fair to have it time out.I don't think a retail value for lottery software... [ More ]

Reply #35

reddog — Mon, 17 May 2004 02:59:01 GMT

Quote: O

Reply #34

lottoarchitect — Mon, 17 May 2004 01:18:41 GMT

Comments and suggestions

Reply #33

LANTERN — Mon, 17 May 2004 01:15:43 GMT

AnastasiosAs to the pick3 I think that it might need a tune up and or changes, but they can wait for a new future version.Once I test it for a while i will let you know.

Reply #32

lottoarchitect — Mon, 17 May 2004 00:20:18 GMT

You are right LANTERN, these are the major issues besides development. Surely, I'll not publish the program until protection is done. I just hope it will not take too long but I think everything should be ready within June or July at most if everything goes as expected.

Reply #31

LANTERN — Sun, 16 May 2004 23:24:29 GMT

ApagogeasSo it might be ready by july or august, but you also need to protect the code, unless you are somehow doing that at the same time that you make and finish the program.

Reply #30

lottoarchitect — Sun, 16 May 2004 14:08:20 GMT

Nice

Reply #29

lottoarchitect — Tue, 27 Apr 2004 08:51:24 GMT

These rates are correct BobP,Actually, you say it in other words, because1 in 20 : 1 in 9.16=1/9.16=10.9%2 in 20 : 1 in 3.37=1/3.37=29.7%etc

Reply #28

BobP — Tue, 27 Apr 2004 07:06:04 GMT

The odds of any set of twenty numbers containing the prize winning numbers in a 5/37 game are . . .5 in 20: 1 in 28.124 in 20: 1 in 5.293 in 20: 1 in 2.812 in 20: 1 in 3.37 (positive)1 in 20: 1 in 9.16 (positive)I don't do math, but I have good software and I know how to use it. ;-) BobP

Reply #27

lottoarchitect — Mon, 26 Apr 2004 23:40:31 GMT

It seems there is a problem

Reply #26

lottoarchitect — Thu, 22 Apr 2004 18:20:17 GMT

Ouaou! Ok, no more ads! I boug

Reply #25

lottoarchitect — Tue, 20 Apr 2004 14:55:12 GMT

The division you apply is not valid because you apply it in different sets of numbers. This is why you get wrong results. I'll explain the above equation just to make it clear why it works.The parameters are as above a,b,n,mWe have the equation %=[ nCm * (b-n)C(a-m) / bCa ] * 100%Now, bCa = the total tickets available for our game.nCm = In how many different ways we can have m numbers in a set of n numbers.Now, for each of the above nCm ways, we can arange the remaining a-m numbers (to form a co... [ More ]

Reply #24

RJOh — Tue, 20 Apr 2004 06:13:12 GMT

5/20 = 15504 possible combinations of 5's - 4845 combinations of 4's5/37 = 435897 possible combinations of 5's - 66045 combinations of 4's15504/435897 = 3.6% and 4845/66045 = 7.3%My guess is the correct solution is between those two figures.

Reply #23

lottoarchitect — Tue, 20 Apr 2004 00:35:15 GMT

There is a mistake in the formulagame 5 of 45 -> a=5, b=45picked numbers -> nmatch -> mThen, chance %= [ nCm * (b-n)C(a-m) / bCa ] * 100

Reply #22

lottoarchitect — Tue, 20 Apr 2004 00:26:36 GMT

nCk is the combination formula

Reply #21

RJOh — Tue, 20 Apr 2004 00:06:51 GMT

I was going to use the equation to calculate the chance% or a match4 in a 5/37 game with 20 numbers,a=5b=37n=20m=4but you didn't define n,C or k. nCk looks like the combination formula.RJOh

Reply #20

lottoarchitect — Mon, 19 Apr 2004 23:02:30 GMT

There is a simple equation to determine the chance to match x numbers. I'll describe it to you. It works only for fields that don't allow same numbers to be drawn (no Pick-3/4 games).Suppose you have a game a of b (eg 5 of 45, a=5 b=45). You want to pick n numbers (eg 10 numbers, n=10) and you want to find the chance to have m matches (eg 3 matches, m=3) in your selection.Then, chance %= [ nCm * (b-m)C(a-m) / bCa ] * 100%where nCk =n!/ (k!*(n-k

Reply #19

RJOh — Mon, 19 Apr 2004 22:19:23 GMT

Apagogeas,I was surprised at those results also because I was looking for a way to pick a few numbers to wheel and willing to accept losing if there was a good chance of a match5 in the near future. I was figuring that any strategy that would work in the future, had probably worked in the past.According to your figures, if I pick 20 numbers the group is more likely to have 3 numbers(35.6%) than 2 numbers (29.6%) than 1 number (10.9%). I would have thought it would be just the opposite. I know... [ More ]

Reply #18

lottoarchitect — Mon, 19 Apr 2004 20:46:20 GMT

So, RJOh you say that you pick 18-25 numbers and in 20 draws, your chance to have 4 correct numbers is 5% in a 5 of 37 game?BobP, all those programs do worse than probability?For example, if i pick X numbers in a game 5 of 37, then the probability is:Picked> 10 15 200 match : 18.5% 6% 1.4%1 match : 40.3% 25.2% 10.9%2 match : 30.2% 37.1% 29.6%3 match : 9.7% 24.1% 35.6%4 match : 1.3% 6.9% 18.9%5 match : 0.05... [ More ]

Reply #17

BobP — Mon, 19 Apr 2004 18:21:37 GMT

Just apply probability you'll get the same answer or the programs did even worse. BobP

Reply #16

RJOh — Mon, 19 Apr 2004 18:16:57 GMT

I recently added a feature to my program that allows me to compare a drawing with the previous drawings (any amount) to see if the hit frequency(hot or cold) can be an indicator of which ones to wheel. For example when looking at the previous 20 draws for a 5/37 game(Buckeye5), numbers that have hit 2-3 times repeat most. It also shows that numbers that have hit 2-3 times is usually a list of 18-25 numbers and contain 4 of the winning numbers about 5% of the time. With PowerBall (5/53) the ch... [ More ]

Reply #15

lottoarchitect — Mon, 19 Apr 2004 15:54:26 GMT

Hi everyone, my questi

Reply #14

lottoarchitect — Thu, 08 Apr 2004 19:02:39 GMT

Thanks BobP, quite a lot of links. I have imported some lotteries and make some tests. Development of the program goes really well. About 50% is ready and works really good

Reply #13

BobP — Thu, 08 Apr 2004 02:01:35 GMT

Official state lottery url links are here:http://www.lotto-logix.com/statesites.htmlCalifornia, New York, Florida, PowerBall and MegaBall are major games, pretty much goes by population the more people the bigger the lottery. While you might need to provide coverage for Indiana 2by2 and Texas Two Step, demonstrating you can win these games won't be as effective as showing you can win standard Pick-5 and Pick-6 games everyone can relate to.BobP

Reply #12

lottoarchitect — Wed, 07 Apr 2004 21:28:52 GMT

Thanks RJOh, I'll give it a tr

Reply #11

lottoarchitect — Wed, 07 Apr 2004 20:36:56 GMT

I would like to test the effectiveness of my system in US lotteries. If you could give me information, urls etc of the most popular lotto games in US this would be more than appreciated. Thanks

Reply #10

lottoarchitect — Fri, 26 Mar 2004 14:17:12 GMT

Sure Excalibur, I'm waiting for your e-mail. If the development continues at the same rate, it will be ready within 2-3 months at most! I update the website regurarly to reflect any progress made so far. Just have a look at the website.

Reply #9

EXCALIBUR — Thu, 25 Mar 2004 12:30:21 GMT

ApagogeasHiHow are you.I have just found out a few days ago some-thing very important about the pick3 besides what I had told you already, I don't want to put the information here I will send it to you by e-mail later in a day or two.By the way I am glad that you will have some more time to work on your program soon.Maybe it will finally be finished this year some-time.Let me know how is doing.

Reply #8

lottoarchitect — Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:43:41 GMT

I'm quite happy, I've don

Reply #7

lottoarchitect — Mon, 15 Mar 2004 06:47:52 GMT

I think the website is pret

Reply #6

lottoarchitect — Thu, 11 Mar 2004 22:31:03 GMT

Ok thanks Excalibur, I'll have a look at this in detail.

Reply #5

EXCALIBUR — Wed, 10 Mar 2004 14:24:27 GMT

pick 3 winners? On the above thread by LuckyCat Pick4 Master has given to me a lot of new information about the pick 3.I'll see if I can put it here, at least the most important parts.Here's something interesting about the daily games I recently discovered.You may not believe this but the Daily games are actually HARDER to manipulate then the Pick-5\6 games.The reason for this is the way the numbers are drawn from the draw machine in the Pick-5\6 games only 1 tube is used and the numbers are arr... [ More ]

Reply #4

lottoarchitect — Wed, 10 Mar 2004 14:15:57 GMT

Yes EXCALIBUR, I work on it about the Pick games. Almost all the code supports it. I think it will be fully supported soon. My first thought was not to include support for Pick games (at this version) but I see that most people play Pick-3 games so it would be unwise not to include it at this version. I'm willing to listen to these ideas too.

Reply #3

EXCALIBUR — Wed, 10 Mar 2004 14:11:21 GMT

Hi I went to your site it says the the program can beused for pick3/4 games also.is that right?if so there are new ideas that i gor from Pick4 Master.I'll tell you about them.

Reply #2

lottoarchitect — Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:26:45 GMT

Thanks EXCALIBUR! Today, I started building a web-site for the program. Some people asked for this, so here it is! All development information will be added there along with screenshots and other material as well.The URL is http://lottoarchitect.freeservers.comIt is a very simple web-site, I'll improve it in the future. Currently, it is incomplete but feel free to have a look. Thanks for your support.This thread will be used for comments, suggestions or whatever you want to say about this progra... [ More ]

Reply #1

EXCALIBUR — Fri, 05 Mar 2004 13:46:17 GMT

Is nice to see that you are making good progress.Bye.

Lotto Architect v2.2

lottoarchitect — Fri, 05 Mar 2004 10:02:26 GMT

Hi everyone, I'm back again! I started this thread to focus on the development issues of Lotto Architect. My previous thread was a bit scattered to follow, so please post messages relevant to the subject. This includes questions, suggestions, comments or whatever you think is appropriate to this. Unfortunately, I had a lot of other work to do during last month, thus the development was not so intense. I hope to have more free time soon.Here is a new screenshot of Lotto Architect:Current developm... [ More ]