has anyone received 1.7 yet??

Reply #24

vick — Wed, 10 Mar 2004 00:55:59 GMT

i sent a pm to you lotto manwell i've run 4 sets so far with my 649 and 1 of the set had 1 number from the last draw, so at least that's fixed at least for now

Reply #23

lottosyncman — Tue, 09 Mar 2004 22:39:36 GMT

hey vick what numbers did it predict want to do a comparison???? pm me in my mail box and i will do the same!!!! maybe this way we can find out faster the ideal setting for the can 6/49

Reply #22

vick — Tue, 09 Mar 2004 14:32:56 GMT

paul if you have a fast computer and are using a low sample and low ball count i think it goes pretty quick

Reply #21

paul762 — Tue, 09 Mar 2004 07:28:37 GMT

not even received mine yet, but i thought it was meant to be quicker!! 74 hour predictions are just no use to me, i play dailies

Reply #20

vick — Tue, 09 Mar 2004 06:44:34 GMT

took about 14 hours on

Reply #19

lottosyncman — Tue, 09 Mar 2004 00:19:58 GMT

i think this could be a very long process coming up with the numbers to play[but i'am not complaining ] if it does the job of at least giving me 3 numbers every other draw i will be more than happy! my setting is at 12000 i wont be done until tomorrow night its too bad the program didnt detail the most ideal setting on the game you play it sure would be alot less monkeying around!!! as ron popeil said in his informercials JUST SET IT AND FORGET IT! lol

Reply #18

vick — Mon, 08 Mar 2004 23:43:43 GMT

i'm hoping that it now selects some of the past draws resultsfor instance on my slower computer i have it running at 30,000 and it said it would take about 16 to 19 hrson my faster computer i have it at 50,000 and it says about the same 16 to 19 hoursi notice that it doesn't show any numbers predicted as it goes, mabye it waits to finish till the end to show all 10 ????? though it does show a progress like at 15,000 string builds it will say 50 % done, i guess because 15,000 is 1/2 of 30,000, b... [ More ]

Reply #17

lottosyncman — Mon, 08 Mar 2004 23:05:53 GMT

running mine at 12000 samples as my computer is looking at 74 hours to process at 30000 samples it seems to me that if we were dealing at 650 samples with 1.6 and now we are at 12000 to 30000 samples we will have to have a much better prediction

Reply #16

vick — Mon, 08 Mar 2004 18:00:31 GMT

yes it seems quicker, at least at the default 30,000 sample rate,

Reply #15

spock — Mon, 08 Mar 2004 17:22:48 GMT

Hi Vick let us know if it is any quicker.

Reply #14

spock — Mon, 08 Mar 2004 17:07:24 GMT

samples always the million dollar question..

Reply #13

vick — Mon, 08 Mar 2004 16:20:26 GMT

I just got my 1.7, looks somewhat different, and the samples have changed, am trying now, but i'd like to know what GURU thinks are the optimal sample for a 649 type game

Reply #12

spock — Mon, 08 Mar 2004 10:10:55 GMT

I only hope it lives up to expectations.

Reply #11

lottosyncman — Sun, 07 Mar 2004 20:55:06 GMT

no 1.7 yet!!!! guru help! we are jonesen!!!!! we need our lotto fix

Reply #10

paul762 — Sun, 07 Mar 2004 20:47:18 GMT

of course

Reply #9

lottoshlep — Sun, 07 Mar 2004 20:23:18 GMT

Quote: O

Reply #8

paul762 — Sun, 07 Mar 2004 20:11:15 GMT

its not that i lack a sense

Reply #7

lottoshlep — Sun, 07 Mar 2004 19:35:20 GMT

... then there are those

Reply #6

gumpgyrl — Sun, 07 Mar 2004 19:32:49 GMT

Nice comeback

Reply #5

paul762 — Sun, 07 Mar 2004 19:12:14 GMT

ive heard that mouthy people get bitch slapped for being cheeky to people who they really wouldnt want to meet

Reply #4

lottoshlep — Sun, 07 Mar 2004 17:36:39 GMT

I heard that annoying

Reply #3

paul762 — Sun, 07 Mar 2004 17:32:03 GMT

No , havent received mine yet either

Reply #2

MarkS — Sun, 07 Mar 2004 16:28:35 GMT

No, i didnt receive anything yet either.

Reply #1

vick — Sun, 07 Mar 2004 16:27:40 GMT

not yet, Guru said he would start shipment today Sunday

has anyone received 1.7 yet??

lottosyncman — Sun, 07 Mar 2004 15:39:02 GMT

did anyone receive their upgrade of lottosync 1.7 yet??? really want to hear how it well it works