<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>L.S Result</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/83352</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/83352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: L.S Result</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/83352/187028</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/83352/187028</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:38:24 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>EXCALIBUR</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I tried it on the Tx2Step using the lowest sample setting because I have an old computer by repeating some of the numbers and got 2 numbers right out of 10.By everything that everybody has said and by my own results, it does not seem to matter much what sample size you use, you can still get some good numbers with low samples and also you can get no or very few good numbers with high samples, but it seems to me that in general this new version is better than the last-one and very much better tha... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/83352/187028">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>EXCALIBUR</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/83352/186935</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/83352/186935</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:11:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>spock</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I kept  anote of the numbers from the draw before still no Good 2 right</p>]]></description>
			<category>spock</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/83352/186807</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/83352/186807</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2004 21:05:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>reddog</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Keep in mind what Guru said, the numbers my represent not this drawing but the following drawing.</p>]]></description>
			<category>reddog</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>L.S Result</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/83352</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/83352</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2004 19:12:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>spock</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Running at 70,000 samples one number right from 10 (6/42 lotto</p>]]></description>
			<category>spock</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

