Unbelieveable!

Reply #22

desparado — Thu, 20 May 2004 21:27:11 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by hypersoniq on April 12, 2004Wheelers (trappers) post far more than predictors anyway...Wheel most probable numbers!Isn't wheeling skill a kind of prediction

Reply #21

desparado — Thu, 20 May 2004 21:24:58 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by emilyg on April 12, 2004some people enjoy posting their results - but if you ask them how they get their numbers - no reply. go figure.If they could tell,they would tell you after they won.Noone is capable of very accuracy number predicting but getting close.

Reply #20

PeterAdvanced — Sun, 25 Apr 2004 02:19:10 GMT

My Idaea is how about you ask everyone to post their 6 numbers to play and until we have 500 postings we'll have a chance of seeing if any of the numbers won.

Reply #19

MrSteel01 — Sat, 24 Apr 2004 14:38:19 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by hypersoniq on April 23, 2004once again all of the the wednesday numbers came from the 90% list. it is a range smaller than the total game size, but only by about 850,000 combinations... goes from 2.9 million down to 2,150,000 combos... roughly... without eliminating 4 and 5 consecutives and previous winners. Positional tracking is helpful as a rangefinder, but I am missing some pieces to the puzzle yet...The answer is repeating sets in groups and combinethem with othe... [ More ]

Reply #18

hypersoniq — Sat, 24 Apr 2004 02:24:41 GMT

once again all of the the wednesday numbers came from the 90% list. it is a range smaller than the total game size, but only by about 850,000 combinations... goes from 2.9 million down to 2,150,000 combos... roughly... without eliminating 4 and 5 consecutives and previous winners. Positional tracking is helpful as a rangefinder, but I am missing some pieces to the puzzle yet...

Reply #17

BobP — Sat, 24 Apr 2004 01:59:10 GMT

You have to realize there are games you can play within your game where all or almost all the winning numbers fall within a range smaller then the total game size, combine that with positional tracking and wheeling and you'll be further along then you expect. BobP

Reply #16

st.germain — Sat, 24 Apr 2004 01:46:23 GMT

I have to say that people who use a wheel and trap numbers definitely do come out winners more often then people who do not as i usually get some return if not half or a little more. Now if I can get all the numbers then i would be a happy camper.

Reply #15

MrSteel01 — Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:04:14 GMT

Thank you all for the responce

Reply #14

johnph77 — Fri, 16 Apr 2004 21:50:29 GMT

MrSteel01 -Being at least as prone to making errors as anyone else, no problem. I hope you get your computer problems squared away as soon as possible.gljohn

Reply #13

MrSteel01 — Fri, 16 Apr 2004 14:37:54 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by johnph77 on April 15, 2004MrSteel01 -There's good reason for the numbers you cite, but a slight error as well. Top sum for a 5/37 game is 33+34+35+36+37=175, not 185.Of the 435,897 combinations possible, only 60 will have a sum of less than 24.Only 322 will have a sum of more than 160.SO OUT OF 435,897 COMBATIONS ABOUT 382 WILL BE SORT OF OUT OF THE PARAMERTERS? THATS 435,897-322=435,575 LEFT RIGHT?Has anyone ever index the draws for the b/5 like sequencialy and cross... [ More ]

Reply #12

MrSteel01 — Fri, 16 Apr 2004 14:25:48 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by johnph77 on April 15, 2004MrSteel01 -There's good reason for the numbers you cite, but a slight error as well. Top sum for a 5/37 game is 33+34+35+36+37=175, not 185.Of the 435,897 combinations possible, only 60 will have a sum of less than 24.Only 322 will have a sum of more than 160.Of the combinations possible, 355,167, or 81.48%, will have 1 through 10 as their lowest number when sorted. This is also true of 28 through 37 being the highest number.gljohntHANK YOU J... [ More ]

Reply #11

Saleo Paleo — Fri, 16 Apr 2004 02:54:14 GMT

Has anyone ever tried using the Longitude and Latitudes of some of the major cities of the world,I have used some and got 5 out of 6 twice,but never the big one,Some predicators say it works but I don't know.Did the predicators win ?????????????.

Reply #10

johnph77 — Fri, 16 Apr 2004 02:19:28 GMT

MrSteel01 -There's good reason for the numbers you cite, but a slight error as well. Top sum for a 5/37 game is 33+34+35+36+37=175, not 185.Of the 435,897 combinations possible, only 60 will have a sum of less than 24.Only 322 will have a sum of more than 160.Of the combinations possible, 355,167, or 81.48%, will have 1 through 10 as their lowest number when sorted. This is also true of 28 through 37 being the highest number.gljohn

Reply #9

RJOh — Thu, 15 Apr 2004 15:18:27 GMT

Quote: O

Reply #8

hypersoniq — Mon, 12 Apr 2004 20:37:25 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Blackapple on April 12, 2004Only the very best predictors can answer that. You know who they are.No, not really... I have seen nothing earth-shaking from ANYONE in jackpot games... If I remember correctly, LP user kristin has the unofficial record for biggest hit posted before draw time on Mega Millions, that was only once and for under $200, still an accomplishment, but it has been my experience that predictors don't really answer anything, that's why we waste all... [ More ]

Reply #7

MrSteel01 — Mon, 12 Apr 2004 18:45:39 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Blackapple on April 12, 2004Only the very best predictors can answer that.You know who they are.Predicting numbers is one thing. Winning is another

Reply #6

MrSteel01 — Mon, 12 Apr 2004 18:36:51 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on April 12, 2004Mr Steel,You can start a trend, start posting some winning predictions for the Pick5 and jackpot games. It takes a little more effort and skill to predict a winner for one of those games than it does to predict a box hit for a pick3 game.Good luck to you and I'll be watching for your Buckeye5 predictions.RJOh I wish I could give the numbers like some people do but I would'nt like to get all the credit Roy. I believe 4 out of 5 my own have come i... [ More ]

Reply #5

RJOh — Mon, 12 Apr 2004 18:13:45 GMT

Mr Steel,You can start a trend, start posting some winning predictions for the Pick5 and jackpot games. It takes a little more effort and skill to predict a winner for one of those games than it does to predict a box hit for a pick3 game.Good luck to you and I'll be watching for your Buckeye5 predictions.RJOh

Reply #4

MrSteel01 — Mon, 12 Apr 2004 17:06:45 GMT

ONE THING MOST DON'T BELIEVE THAT MOST NUNMBERS FALL BETWEEN LIMITS!CALL THEM SUMS, GROUPS OR REAPTING SETS!OHIO 5/37LOW SUM 15/ACTUAL 24 HIGH SUM 185/ACTUAL 160 SAME SINCE 5/5/91/92?SO WHY WOULD YOU PLAY A SUM LOWER OR HIGHER?NUMBERS 01 THRU 10 START 75% +-NUMBERS 11 THRU 37 START 25% +SOME PEOPLE STICK W/THE IDEA

Reply #3

emilyg — Mon, 12 Apr 2004 16:56:53 GMT

some people enjoy posting their results - but if you ask them how they get their numbers - no reply. go figure.

Reply #2

Jani Norman — Mon, 12 Apr 2004 16:56:16 GMT

It really is something to think about, and wonder is it at all possible for all of us to win a MEGA MILLION, or another larger LOTTO

Reply #1

Blackapple — Mon, 12 Apr 2004 16:54:04 GMT

Only the very best predictors can answer that.You know who they are.

Unbelieveable!

MrSteel01 — Mon, 12 Apr 2004 16:48:31 GMT

With al most 5,000 members why their has not been a greater effert on us all to win!JUST W/5 DIGIT 1 IN 500,000 EST ODDS! WOULD BE GREAT!AND A GUY PLAYES $50.00 + A DAY ON THE SAME NUMBER WINS?*3-6-11-12-28=60