Numerology & Powerball I

Reply #12

Colin F — Mon, 24 May 2004 03:55:59 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by hypersoniq on May 23, 2004I am no closer to winning with my myriad of excel formulas than rdarmand is with numerology, but we're both trying... and that's why we're all here...HypersoniqI don't think I'm wrong in thinking rdarmand was being both sarcastic and sardonic.My definition of successfull just looks at the reality of playing Lotto type games. If the house margin wasn't 50 or 60% (think of it as a tax to play) and was only 2 or 3% then realistically you could g... [ More ]

Reply #11

golotto — Sun, 23 May 2004 16:47:02 GMT

I totally agree about the importance posting new ideas...any and all ideas! I'm growing increasingly interested in any correlations between exact time/dates of draws and numbers drawn. Let my old statistics professor turn over in his grave. If Marchese Guglielmo Marconi had listened to his critics he would never have shown that it's possible to send a wireless signal from Cornwall, England to St. John's, Newfoundland. Who were his critics? The Italian government among others. But he trudged on a... [ More ]

Reply #10

Pick-4_Master — Sun, 23 May 2004 16:24:58 GMT

There are players beating the odds they play 50-100 combo's in the Daily games and win weekly.There small in number but they do exist I've met some of them they hit once or twice a week.

Reply #9

hypersoniq — Sun, 23 May 2004 13:45:15 GMT

the whole point anyway was not to discourage anyone from posting ideas... we're all in the same boat here... just because it may not seem like a good idea to you... it is one more idea... and they are slow to come about these days (new ideas or avenues to explore).I am no closer to winning with my myriad of excel formulas than rdarmand is with numerology, but we're both trying... and that's why we're all here...

Reply #8

hypersoniq — Sun, 23 May 2004 13:40:37 GMT

I would consider someone successful in this field if they won more than they bet... consistently.... with a reasonably affordable amount of lines to play (reasonably affordable will vary widely by player but I think $5 or $10 is reasonable.)As far as I can see, there has been nobody doing that on even a semi-regular basis. Many people do better than published odds by using more lines than is feasible to play realistically... or the pick 3 for example... all state picks don't count because it's n... [ More ]

Reply #7

Wheeler — Sun, 23 May 2004 11:30:04 GMT

Has anyone here heard of the Up Down Pick 3 System? The book i got in the mail says u can win 95% of the time and the system is $129.00 for the first printing then goes up to $199.00 for the second printing and the third printing will be $249.00

Reply #6

emilyg — Sun, 23 May 2004 04:21:47 GMT

Quote

Reply #5

Colin F — Sun, 23 May 2004 03:23:53 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by hypersoniq on May 22, 2004Quote: Originally posted by Colin F on May 22, 2004 those who are successful in this field.name one...hypersoniqI've defined what I regard as successful in this field on a number of Posts. If you can consistently get better than the published odds then you're successful in my opinion ie you've beat the odds. BobP's 164 lines satisfy that criteria. I call them BobP's lines but as he points out that approach apparently started with Gail Howard.... [ More ]

Reply #4

Pick-4_Master — Sun, 23 May 2004 02:26:48 GMT

Using Numerology to select lottery numbers is useless it wasn't created for gambling purposes like that,however it can be used to help select the best days for you to play lucky numbers or quick-picks.I tested this theory in the late 90's and it was successful as far as the numerological days based on my Birthday but using numbers selected with numerology didn't work well enough to pursue.When I did hit numbers aquired from other methods and played on Numerologically significant days I did win.... [ More ]

Reply #3

hypersoniq — Sun, 23 May 2004 01:20:10 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Colin F on May 22, 2004 those who are successful in this field.name one...

Reply #2

rdarmand — Sun, 23 May 2004 01:06:27 GMT

Hi, Colin,I'm sorr

Reply #1

Colin F — Sun, 23 May 2004 00:47:23 GMT

rdarmandWhy do you presume that anyone uses such information?Aggregate data like this is as useless as the average home runs in all the baseball matches. Nothing to do with winning.Keep amusing yourself but stay away from attributing you findings as having any relevance to those who are successful in this field.Your general tone is that of a sore loser; blame your parents, blame the moon, wind or sun - but don't blame us. Now, if you suddenly feel compelled to go out when there's a full moon and... [ More ]

Numerology & Powerball I

rdarmand — Sat, 22 May 2004 20:05:56 GMT

I have just completed an ex