167 Draw Singles Method & CRUNCH

Reply #16

gilla — Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:03:06 GMT

234(342) 459(594) 124(142) 126(126) 249(429) 079(907) 256(562) 134(413) 147(741) 037(307) 024(402) 689(698) 246(264) 467(467) 146(164) 357(573) 139(319) 267(267) 356(563) 469(469) 178(718) 478(847) 067(706) 027(027) 026(026) 168(618) 068(860) 347(437) 047(704) 015(015) 056(506) 023(032) 034(304) 589(589) 569(659) 036(306) 016(016) 468(468) 348(834) 169(196) 389(839) 368(863) 238(283) 279(729) 679(967) Priority : 1 /40 numbers did not appear yet at all! Our secundary focus!017 018 028 029 039 049... [ More ]

Reply #15

MikeK — Wed, 23 Jun 2004 22:28:13 GMT

Interesting sort, Gilla. No

Reply #14

gilla — Wed, 23 Jun 2004 20:40:50 GMT

Reply #13

winsumloosesum — Wed, 23 Jun 2004 12:10:13 GMT

MikeK,I ran same exact setup using key numbers and singles only.167 past drawings (June 20 backwards)Key numbers (0 1 5 6 7 8 9)Results:0 4 3 Straight win June 22, 2004Priority : 2024(420) 579(579) 035(503) 278(728) 346(643) 015(501) 167(167) 078(708) 459(549) 678(876) 168(861) 289(982) 357(537) 368(863) 125(521) 079(097) 156(165) 458(845) 023(023) 189(891) 149(491) 049(940) 389(983) 239(923) 056(605) 367(376) 267(267) 145(145) 034(043) 489(984) 028(280) 257(527) 234(243) 018(108) 123(321

Reply #12

MikeK — Mon, 21 Jun 2004 00:08:50 GMT

Okay, sync.Let's see what I can coime up with.Good Luck and Stay tuned.

Reply #11

synchronicity83 — Sun, 20 Jun 2004 20:28:23 GMT

Yes, exactly. Keep it simple. Thank you.

Reply #10

MikeK — Sun, 20 Jun 2004 19:47:17 GMT

That is certainly doable, synchronicity83. Question is how fancy it should be.The easy verison would be:Let's say if you have 3 pairs, 01, 45, 16014501164516Is that how you see it should it do more?Mike

Reply #9

synchronicity83 — Sun, 20 Jun 2004 19:24:23 GMT

Mike,I would like to request a pairs wheel where you could input the 15 pairs you think are most likely to show up and it would wheel them into all the possible 4-digit combinations. Can you do this

Reply #8

MikeK — Sun, 20 Jun 2004 18:01:05 GMT

LANTERN,Roulette is certainly on my list. I always found that game fascinating. It is the closest related to my lottery sytems.Slots is not so much the winning and prediction, but the correct way to bet to survive longer and with that potentially winning s jackpot or something.Dice I have to get used to, that might take a moment.Beach Comber,Would that not work already by selecting 2 5 6 as key numbers? You can certainly add an additional list of numbers using /+L/.Steve,That is very impressive... [ More ]

Reply #7

winsumloosesum — Sun, 20 Jun 2004 01:44:59 GMT

Hey Mike,Check this out!!Based on your instructions.Pennsylvania Evening past draws 167 (12/27/03 through 6/10/2003)Priority : 2048(840) 249(492) 024(420) 579(579) 035(503) 058(058) 278(728) 346(643) 015(501) 167(167) 459(549) 678(876) 168(861) 357(537) 368(863) 125(521) 079(097) 047(704) 013(301) 156(165) 458(845) 023(023) 189(891) 149(491) 138(813) 049(940) 389(983) 239(923) 056(605) 179(917) 267(267) 145(145) 034(043) 489(984) 028(280) 257(527) 234(243) 018(108) 123(321) 019(190) 089(809) 379... [ More ]

Reply #6

beachcomber — Sun, 20 Jun 2004 01:29:47 GMT

Okay Mike taking one step further the 3 most popular numbers are 2-5-6 in any state as if you check one or some times both of these numbers will show up in 5 or 6 of the draws in any given week. Since each number generates 36 combinations {athough there will be repeats] could you take these combinations add them with /+L/ and generate the priority numbers that would be playable with a return that makes it worth playing? You really got me cranking on the combinations that would mean something a... [ More ]

Reply #5

LANTERN — Sat, 19 Jun 2004 22:49:53 GMT

MikeKNow that you are there, maybe you will take some time to take a look at and study the roullete and maybe come out with some kind of prediction system for it given enough time or in due time as some other people have done or tried to do before and while on this also consider the onearmed bandit, I think that some people have also tried to predict that one, no need to spend any money on either of them, observing them in action enough times and meditating on them + maybe some math calculations... [ More ]

Reply #4

MikeK — Sat, 19 Jun 2004 21:14:59 GMT

Beachcomber,That seems like an interesting point and I think is defeintely related to this topic here in particular. The idea seems very similar. 18 weeks * 7 = 126 drawings in FLorida, that is not far away from my 167. It should be possible to create a weekly selection with the Crunch using 18 weeks. It is particularly interesting, because I do beleive in playing numbers for not only one day but for longer.Shuld be easy to test.Thanks for the input.Good Luck

Reply #3

beachcomber — Sat, 19 Jun 2004 20:35:41 GMT

Hey Mike, Has anybody thought of handicapping the numbers on a weekly basis and using 18 weeks of results as 80-90% that recycle occur in this time frame. I have followed this for 15 years and found that this occurs here in Fl and most others states. Maybe it has already been considered but I have not seen anything in relation to this. Just a thought. Beachcomber

Reply #2

MikeK — Sat, 19 Jun 2004 20:24:49 GMT

Thanks, Win D.Midday/Evening could of course be entered and used separately. As of the straights I have to calculate that. That should be possible to find out.I hope that this is a move to the better.Thanks again and Good Luck,

Reply #1

WIN D — Sat, 19 Jun 2004 18:07:46 GMT

Now you are cooking Mike...... one of the biggest and best filters we could use on those Priority Nums now is to Separate the draws into Midday and Evening draws. That way we wouldn't have to play both draws trying to trap a number. The biggest and best filter to use is to separate the Midday and Evening draws. I believe that most of the time... less than 10% of the straights from a previous year ..365 draws return in less than 12 months. If you separate the draws. Keep going Mike...and I wil... [ More ]

167 Draw Singles Method & CRUNCH

MikeK — Sat, 19 Jun 2004 17:38:48 GMT

Upon request: Next Crunching round,

I am glad to be online again.

Out of the previous discussion at https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/89695 and through many additionla PM's here an adjusted version of the method based on the input from CalifDude and Win D. Calif was interested in the chances of returning numbers, and Win D wanted to see the numbers that did not appear yet.

This brings up another focus and a different calucation.

Here the beginning thoughts: We know that the chances... [ More ]