Newbie Question...

Reply #8

BobP — Mon, 28 Jun 2004 02:00:22 GMT

For Pick-3 and Pick-4 I don't think frequency matters as much as when it's each digit's turn to hit again. Frequency whether in total or by position can be totally different for different players one using a week, another ten days, another two weeks range of history, etc.Watching the skips and hits can tell you when a digit is expected, whether it shows up or not is another story, but at least you know what's due to hit in a perfect world. BobP

Reply #7

LANTERN — Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:22:58 GMT

The lottery people don't go by and don't care about the 1000 pick 4 numbers, they go by the 0 to 9 digits.That is in the long run every one of this 10 0 to 9 digits must show up an almost equal number of times, that is the requirment that they must go by, they don't care too much how many times any given pick 3 combo comes out, some never or almost never come out others only 1 or 2 times and yet others 6 to 8 or 9 times in 10 or so years, that does not matter to them, they only go by digit (0 to... [ More ]

Reply #6

Colin F — Sun, 27 Jun 2004 07:50:45 GMT

To AllDo I detect a maturing in thought here?No over exaggeration, hype etc!This is the road map to respectability for our noble interest and quest - you've got to be plucky to take on odds of 8 million to 1..Yes, we exercise our brains, (and therefore live longer), entertain ourselves and beat the odds if we do it right. RegardsColin

Reply #5

hypersoniq — Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:35:53 GMT

depending on the nature and amount of picks, just about all systems can be backtested to glean real results... but can just as easily be colored by hindsight...for example... PA pick 3... I have fully backtested the following against the entire draw history (all the way back to 1977)... TicTacToe, Skips (longest outs), NBey6's system and a host of pencil and paper systems from the infamous 111 to the julian date system... no natural winners... with some tweaking winners could be found, but if yo... [ More ]

Reply #4

BobP — Sat, 26 Jun 2004 17:52:50 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by kannooks on June 24, 2004do these systems even work? is there any real science to this? i am new to this group, so i also wanted to say hi...None of them can work in the scientifically proveable sense. Pick-3/4To be successfull there is always a human factor where it comes down to you making a choice that will determine whether you will win or lose. Of course there is no reasonable basis for making the choice which must be made correctly for the system to play at a

Reply #3

LottoMagizZ4941 — Sat, 26 Jun 2004 16:20:33 GMT

I use to play numbers that did not come up frequently thinking they were over due.However the balls in the collorado lottery were chiped or something and numbers were comming up more frequent then should have been by chance.Once they figured it out they fixed the balls.So my plan was not good considering that the therotical mathimatical odds were scewed by the balls usesShan [url]www.fla .net/cgi-local/s.cgi?welcome-344[/url] Ziel

Reply #2

lottoarchitect — Sat, 26 Jun 2004 16:15:55 GMT

Everything depends on what do you consider a success. Many people believe that winning the minor prizes is success. Other people say success is only if you hit the top prize. No matter what, a success of a system is to gain more than the money spent in overall. Behind any system there is science of course but the random nature of the lottery games require more intelligent systems to design. Now, there are people that say randomness cannot be trapped and those that believe there must be something... [ More ]

Reply #1

QWEST46 — Thu, 24 Jun 2004 14:47:22 GMT

Most systems do not work on a consistent basis. Of course there is real science and mathematics to systems.

Newbie Question...

kannooks — Thu, 24 Jun 2004 13:12:07 GMT

do these systems even work? is there any real science to this? i am new to this group, so i also wanted to say hi...