<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Moving average test for Pick 3&#x26;4</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/91852</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/91852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Moving average test for Pick 3&#x26;4</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Moving average test for Pick 3&#x26;4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/91852</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/91852</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2004 23:55:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Bertil</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I seem to recall reading here recently a suggestion to use a moving average of the sum of Pick-3 numbers as a base for the next draw.Moving averages of various kinds are often used to determine trends of gradually changing data, not for random fluctuations from one extreme to another. But why not try the idea if a short test indicates it might work for lottery numbers. Such a test should be based on a few hundred draws.The evening draws in the CT Play-3 game from June 03 were made available to m... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/91852">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Bertil</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

