<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>RNG Reference</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/93164</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/93164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: RNG Reference</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/93164/240677</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/93164/240677</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2004 10:35:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Colin F</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>JKingI hope you&#x27;re reading all this reference material you&#x27;re posting. Quite often you&#x27;re bringing up topics that have well and truly been thrashed out before on this Forum.What would impress me is when raising a topic you checked for previous contributions on this Forum. Then instead of making the assumption that because it is new to you it is also new to all of us you referenced that previous thread if applicable and mentioned something in there that warranted further discussion. This has a tw... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/93164/240677">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Colin F</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RNG Reference</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/93164</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/93164</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2004 17:04:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JKING</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>With all the talk about RNG&#x27;s try this site:http://mathworld.wolfram.com/RandomNumber.htmlI found this paragraph rather interesting:It is impossible to produce an arbitrarily long string of random digits and prove it is random. Strangely, it is also very difficult for humans to produce a string of random digits, and computer programs can be written which, on average, actually predict some of the digits humans will write down based on previous ones.Just an FYI</p>]]></description>
			<category>JKING</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

