<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Hpothetical Pick System</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/94727</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/94727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Hpothetical Pick System</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/94727/249925</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/94727/249925</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 23:35:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JKING</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Since I evaluate all the combinations, there&#x27;s no reason to introduce anything that is random. As my program loops thru the combinations, it discards any combination that does not meet the filter requirements. ie:for a=1 to 39for b=2 to 38for c=3 to 37for d=4 to 36for c=5 to 35Rem positional dataif a&#x3e; x1 then goto skipif b&#x3e;x2 then goto skipif c&#x3e;x3 then goto skipif d&#x3e;x4 then goto skipif e&#x3e;x5 then goto skipRem sum dataif a+b+c+d+e &#x3e;x6 or a+b+c+d+e &#x3c;x7 then goto skipskipnext enext dnext cnext bnext... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/94727/249925">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>JKING</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/94727/249798</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/94727/249798</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 17:39:20 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>pigskin</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>does your system permit using a group of random selected numbers and have the program discard all the combos included in the numbers submitted</p>]]></description>
			<category>pigskin</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/94727/249452</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/94727/249452</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 22:13:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JKING</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Sorry about the spelling of hypothetical.  The thought here, right or wrong, is an attemp to end up with a set of numbers that are measureable for their accuracy. This is at the number level. Why wheel numbers that are 98% wrong? Why generate conbinations, random or otherwise, that don&#x27;t take into account what the probable numbers might be on a different level. I&#x27;m not saying these other systems are wrong. They ultimately might be the best way. However, if I&#x27;m getting a little bit of the drift g... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/94727/249452">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>JKING</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/94727/249424</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/94727/249424</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 21:16:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>RJOh</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Every lottery number picking system have the same goals of picking some winning numbers, no matter how much effort or time goes into coming up with the final results, unless it does better than randomly picked numbers then it&#x27;s no better than a QP, but it&#x27;s still entertaining to lose your own special way.RJOh</p>]]></description>
			<category>RJOh</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/94727/249375</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/94727/249375</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 18:07:06 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>BobP</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Once the filters are passed there is no valid criteria for further sorting.  Lotwin takes all the numbers you give it, including using all the numbers, generates a full wheel which if using all the numbers must include all the winning combinations, then using your filter settings builds a wheel on the fly for a lower tier prize of your choosing.  A link to a demo of Lotwin can be found at . . .http://www.lotto-logix.com/lottosoft.html  you might also take a look at Lotto Architect and Lottohat w... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/94727/249375">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>BobP</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Hpothetical Pick System</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/94727</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/94727</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 17:39:16 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JKING</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>This is a system I&#x27;m working on (early stages). Any thoughts or questions?1Run All Combinations2Pass Through Filters of Choice  giving points to each individual combinationthat passes each filter3Sum points for each combination4Sort for the top 10/15 numbers of the highest combinations5Sort for the top 10/15 numbers of 2nd highest combinations6Sort for the top 10/15 numbers of 3rd highest combinations7Track against actual picks to see accuracy</p>]]></description>
			<category>JKING</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

