Ore. Megabucks

Reply #7

JMorenoMars — Wed, 13 Oct 2004 21:23:42 GMT

No Comment

Reply #6

CASH Only — Wed, 13 Oct 2004 20:56:44 GMT

Lifetime prizes should be restricted to scratch games. (Same goes for WA Unlucky for Life .

Reply #5

Babel — Wed, 13 Oct 2004 05:05:23 GMT

Why would we want Hot Lotto? It grows at a snail's pace. And what's so wrong with Lucky for Life (other then the $2 entry fee

Reply #4

CASH Only — Tue, 12 Oct 2004 20:05:19 GMT

You can argue that Oregon should have Hot Lotto. OR needs to retire the online game Lose for Life .

Reply #3

Babel — Tue, 12 Oct 2004 08:07:16 GMT

Most of the time Megabucks isn't worth the hastle in my mind. If you match 3 you get a new ticket. You have to match 4 or more to get any money. I'm in it for the big jackpot.

Reply #2

dvdiva — Tue, 12 Oct 2004 05:17:54 GMT

why its the only game worth playing now. if anything they should retire the current multi-state lotteries and replace them with something that can generate a large jackpot for once. anyway the oregon lottery like most with video games makes most of its money with video poker and keno (every few minutes a new drawing).

Reply #1

DoctorEw220 — Tue, 12 Oct 2004 04:59:03 GMT

someone is going to hit it sooner or later. i hope it tells the oregon lottery to retire it since appearantely sales are not doing too well.

Ore. Megabucks

JimmySand9 — Tue, 12 Oct 2004 04:24:03 GMT

This is wild. This game is a 6/48 with 2 plays for a dollar, and has 3 draws a week. And it's the biggest jackpot in the country (2nd highest in the world). This is crazy