OH thinking of replacing Super Lotto Plus

Reply #15

CASH Only — Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:44:44 GMT

I'm sure PA is keeping track of the sales.

Reply #14

DoctorEw220 — Thu, 20 Jan 2005 06:03:09 GMT

did you also notice that the number of people maching 5 of 6 is not usually that big. does PA take a look at the payouts? that should give them a clue about the sales.

Reply #13

CASH Only — Thu, 20 Jan 2005 01:44:39 GMT

Losing twice (once instantly, again in the drawing

Reply #12

CASH Only — Wed, 12 Jan 2005 17:11:05 GMT

$2 ticket price, non-cash prize, etc.

Reply #11

DoctorEw220 — Tue, 11 Jan 2005 23:45:52 GMT

with such a small matrix, and only 2 jackpot winners, you would think PA would get the hint.

Reply #10

CASH Only — Tue, 11 Jan 2005 15:18:01 GMT

I'm guessing PA Unlucky for Life will be gone before the bi-state game starts.

Reply #9

CASH Only — Sat, 18 Dec 2004 18:55:22 GMT

Mass. too while they're at it.

Reply #8

CASH Only — Tue, 07 Dec 2004 22:16:28 GMT

Like PA and NY.

Reply #7

DoctorEw220 — Wed, 10 Nov 2004 03:50:08 GMT

they need more states to join.

Reply #6

CASH Only — Tue, 09 Nov 2004 14:38:23 GMT

So far it looks like Michigan and Ohio are planning this game.

Reply #5

DoctorEw220 — Mon, 08 Nov 2004 22:44:27 GMT

the main reason why lotteries are charging $2 per game is so they can pay out the prizes.

Reply #4

RJOh — Mon, 08 Nov 2004 22:43:12 GMT

If they expect to charge $2 per play, they going to have better odds than MegaMillions and a good size jackpot amount. With Rolling Cash5 being a mini jackpot game, I doubt if there will must interest in paying $2 for a ticket with worse overall odds than the other games.RJOh

Reply #3

DoctorEw220 — Mon, 08 Nov 2004 22:31:09 GMT

i know that PA has wanted to go in with OH on a game before, but i doubt PA will get rid of ucky for Life Lotto anytime soon. I think that PA thinks that once more people win the jackpot, it will boost sales.

Reply #2

CASH Only — Mon, 08 Nov 2004 21:34:30 GMT

The survey said Ohio would partner with a neighboring state. (Maryland does not border OH.) I suggest that OH introduce this game with PA; the latter dumping Unlucky for Life.

Reply #1

CASH Only — Mon, 08 Nov 2004 21:25:14 GMT

Maybe the Mega Millions states should have a secondary game (like Hot Lotto).

OH thinking of replacing Super Lotto Plus

DoctorEw220 — Mon, 08 Nov 2004 19:27:40 GMT

Well, Ohio is thinking about replacing Super Lotto Plus (again). This time, they are trying to go in with a few states (I'm guessing maybe PA, IN, MI, WV, or MD) on a game that would cost $2 (Boo!), but would offer jackpots in excess of $40-50 million (Not bad.). I do like the idea, but not the ticket price. They did not specfy if jackpots would be annuity or lump sum. Any comments