Michigan Clasic Lotto 47Prev TopicNext Topic

• DoctorEw220

  

  Yinzer Country, PA
  United States
  Member #4,067
  March 18, 2004
  2,741 Posts
  Offline
  May 24, 2005, 5:01 pm

  ▲▼

  As we all know, Michigan introduced Classic Lotto 47 a few weeks ago.  Seeing as how the first one was retired, how long would you give this one?
  

  I've redone my website.  Go to www.dr-ew.com.  I kept a lot of the old stuff, and I've added some new stuff.  Look for more new stuff in the coming weeks.
• qutgnt

  United States
  Member #3,676
  February 10, 2004
  425 Posts
  Offline
  May 24, 2005, 6:42 pm

  ▲▼

  There is nothing redeeming about this game, it will take months for a jackpot to get to a high level that people actually notice.
• DoctorEw220

  

  Yinzer Country, PA
  United States
  Member #4,067
  March 18, 2004
  2,741 Posts
  Offline
  May 24, 2005, 8:09 pm

  ▲▼

  The problem is that the Michigan Lottery does not notice a crappy game right away.  I'm not saying I liked Winfall better, but this is pretty much Winfall without a jackpot cap and minus 2 numbers.  Also, what were they thinking by making the starting jackpot $1 million?  Are lotteries wising up and starting to teach players the value of a dollar by offering jackpots that will not set them for life?
  

  I've redone my website.  Go to www.dr-ew.com.  I kept a lot of the old stuff, and I've added some new stuff.  Look for more new stuff in the coming weeks.
• JimmySand9

  

  United States
  Member #1,826
  July 11, 2003
  2,645 Posts
  Offline
  May 24, 2005, 10:22 pm

  ▲▼

  It's crappy because the game is drawn with computers. Simple as that.
  

  (insert signature here)
• CASH Only

  United States
  Member #379
  June 5, 2002
  11,296 Posts
  Offline
  Jun 23, 2005, 9:40 am

  ▲▼

  I'm not high on 'puters drawing winning numbers either.