harrisburg pa United States
Member #4,555
May 3, 2004
19 Posts
Offline
Has anyone used the lottery software/system Lottery Logics? Or lotto cheetah? Or is there any other really good software that might send you the picks for the day so you dont have to take the time figuring out what to play?
Tx United States
Member #4,570
May 4, 2004
5,180 Posts
Offline
Is there a gold pot at the end of the rainbow so we won't have to neither work nor play the lottery? Let us go look for it.
Try VersaBet and maybe also some of Mikek's programs, maybe they are as close as you are going to get with commercial lottery software, he has very many programs that you can try, of his don't try the very old ones, I mean the first or oldest of them, try from the Candy number onward.
United States
Member #4,877
May 30, 2004
5,289 Posts
Offline
Has anyone used the lottery software/system Lottery Logics? Or lotto cheetah? Or is there any other really good software that might send you the picks for the day so you dont have to take the time figuring out what to play?
"NO".....most are afreido to .....
cumon LOTTERY POST and advertise........what they cannot "DELIVER"!!!!!!
"Most members @ Lottery Post are $mart & $AVAIGE"!!!!!!!!!
Dump Water Florida United States
Member #380
June 5, 2002
3,568 Posts
Offline
Lotto Cheatah is a weighted random number picker, the weights determined by draw history which you have to subscribe to, so you never really get to own the software.
Lotto Logic is Timmer Soft lottery software and not Lotto-Logix though you will find Lotto Logic listed in the lottery software directory at Lotto-Logix. As to whether it is any good, becomes a question of whether there is anything worse or anything that works at all more often then probability would suggest.
I've owned dozens of lottery software programs and while I use them for research especially Gail Howard and Lottery Director, none pick winning numbers worth a damn. Pick 24 out of 49 to wheel and you have 3 right more often then not, same as the distribution for odd/even or low/high about one time in a hundred you have all six winning numbers among your 24.
That's not to say you can't develop your own winning system from the information, I'm just saying they haven't done it for you and if they did the software would be a million dollars a copy. BobP
United States
Member #4,877
May 30, 2004
5,289 Posts
Offline
Has anyone used the lottery software/system Lottery Logics? Or lotto cheetah? Or is there any other really good software that might send you the picks for the day so you dont have to take the time figuring out what to play?
United States
Member #4,877
May 30, 2004
5,289 Posts
Offline
Has anyone used the lottery software/system Lottery Logics? Or lotto cheetah? Or is there any other really good software that might send you the picks for the day so you dont have to take the time figuring out what to play?
mark2995:
" PLEASE"?????????? tell-us how "YOU" have LEARN'ed about ...........
software...................& HOW it existtttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt????????
" Do you pay fof Lottery Logics or lotto cheeeeeeeeeeethah or is it free
United States
Member #41,382
June 16, 2006
1,969 Posts
Offline
Lotto Cheatah is a weighted random number picker, the weights determined by draw history which you have to subscribe to, so you never really get to own the software.
Lotto Logic is Timmer Soft lottery software and not Lotto-Logix though you will find Lotto Logic listed in the lottery software directory at Lotto-Logix. As to whether it is any good, becomes a question of whether there is anything worse or anything that works at all more often then probability would suggest.
I've owned dozens of lottery software programs and while I use them for research especially Gail Howard and Lottery Director, none pick winning numbers worth a damn. Pick 24 out of 49 to wheel and you have 3 right more often then not, same as the distribution for odd/even or low/high about one time in a hundred you have all six winning numbers among your 24.
That's not to say you can't develop your own winning system from the information, I'm just saying they haven't done it for you and if they did the software would be a million dollars a copy. BobP
Exactly Bob.
And a lot of the 'book writers' - their claim to fame was in the 80's, a lot of them have not won (or picked) much of anything noteable in YEARS. And if they could (pick consistent winners), there would be no more lottery.
New Jersey United States
Member #17,842
June 28, 2005
180,936 Posts
Offline
Lotto Cheatah is a weighted random number picker, the weights determined by draw history which you have to subscribe to, so you never really get to own the software.
Lotto Logic is Timmer Soft lottery software and not Lotto-Logix though you will find Lotto Logic listed in the lottery software directory at Lotto-Logix. As to whether it is any good, becomes a question of whether there is anything worse or anything that works at all more often then probability would suggest.
I've owned dozens of lottery software programs and while I use them for research especially Gail Howard and Lottery Director, none pick winning numbers worth a damn. Pick 24 out of 49 to wheel and you have 3 right more often then not, same as the distribution for odd/even or low/high about one time in a hundred you have all six winning numbers among your 24.
That's not to say you can't develop your own winning system from the information, I'm just saying they haven't done it for you and if they did the software would be a million dollars a copy. BobP
Exactly Bob.
And a lot of the 'book writers' - their claim to fame was in the 80's, a lot of them have not won (or picked) much of anything noteable in YEARS. And if they could (pick consistent winners), there would be no more lottery.
New Mexico United States
Member #12,305
March 10, 2005
2,984 Posts
Offline
Lotto Cheatah is a weighted random number picker, the weights determined by draw history which you have to subscribe to, so you never really get to own the software.
Lotto Logic is Timmer Soft lottery software and not Lotto-Logix though you will find Lotto Logic listed in the lottery software directory at Lotto-Logix. As to whether it is any good, becomes a question of whether there is anything worse or anything that works at all more often then probability would suggest.
I've owned dozens of lottery software programs and while I use them for research especially Gail Howard and Lottery Director, none pick winning numbers worth a damn. Pick 24 out of 49 to wheel and you have 3 right more often then not, same as the distribution for odd/even or low/high about one time in a hundred you have all six winning numbers among your 24.
That's not to say you can't develop your own winning system from the information, I'm just saying they haven't done it for you and if they did the software would be a million dollars a copy. BobP
Exactly Bob.
And a lot of the 'book writers' - their claim to fame was in the 80's, a lot of them have not won (or picked) much of anything noteable in YEARS. And if they could (pick consistent winners), there would be no more lottery.
Why would their be no more Lottery?
Raven:
The lottery business can only exist in an environment where the players can't beat it. If they could, there'd be no rolls, nuthun.
On the other hand, an actual system that's capable of beating the lotteries is in no danger of being generally adopted by the general lottery playing population, nor by the best minds out there (represented by the posters to this forum).
Those latter great minds simply do not believe such a system can exist and they're prepared to go to the mat with vituperation and innuendo anytime someone suggests otherwise.
Consider, for instance, the historical figure on LP, Alonzo Wright. He spent a number of days being pilloried by the people on this forum after coming here with a system he claimed worked. He responded to the challenge, the laughs and snipes, by posting a set of 17 numbers plus a red that would hit on MM that night.
Believe it or not, the System Forum members could not wait for the draw to begin announcing his failure and further ridiculing him, alienating him.
Four whites and the red. That's how the draw came out.
And Alonzo Wright drifted away from LP with a whole different attitude toward this site, a new appreciation for the determination of the best minds here to find a cure for the lottery disease.
Similarly, PadawanLotto currently stands at the top of the Hit Ratio List on the Predictions page, testing the vilified Expert Lotto system.
LottoVantage announced a system recently he believes is a winner, spent his time in the barrel being whupped for his claim by the same people who ridiculed Alonzo Wright between the time of his announcement and the draw.
Yeah, there's no danger of the lottery ceasing to exist because of a winning system. Never.
There will be winning systems. Over and over again, most likely. But the best minds the lottery consumer business has to offer are in no danger of using them. And the people who develop those systems aren't in much danger of sharing them after they've had a taste of the Systems Forum open-minded approach and reception to the concept of systems.
The Carolinas - Charlotte United States
Member #21,626
September 12, 2005
4,142 Posts
Offline
Well said Jack. There aren't enough people that would use these systems to ever endanger the system of being beaten. Sure a couple hundred people here and there, but not enough to close the lotteries altogether.
The North Carolina Education Lottery - so much a joke that here are their mascots: