What are the odds that a man could throw away a $1 million scratch ticket, lose his father and then his own life all in four months' time?
The regulars who play their lottery tickets here at the White Hen Pantry grocery now shrug away the misfortune that started at the counter last October for one of their own, Kevin Donovan, as if bowing to the vagaries of luck they gamble against each day.
But Donovan's run of bad luck has outlived him.
Last fall, he filed a claim against the elderly man who retrieved the $1 million ticket Donovan had mistakenly thrown into a garbage bin. In April, three months after Donovan, 49, died suddenly of a heart ailment, the Massachusetts State Lottery ruled the ticket rightfully belonged to its finder, 83-year-old Edward J. St. John.
Now Donovan's two children have filed suit in Superior Court hoping to reverse the Lottery Commission's decision and claim the ticket's proceeds.
Their lawyer contends the ticket was lost — not thrown away — and because the garbage bin had not yet been placed on the sidewalk for disposal, its contents were not yet in the "public domain."
"It is no different than if that ticket was on the shelf," says Daniel T. Doyle. "Mr. St. John wrongfully took that ticket."
Kevin Donovan and Edward St. John were regulars at the White Hen.
Donovan, a mechanic on disability, worked part time at the Xtra gas station up the street. He was a big man who strode into the White Hen most days to sit among the regulars at the small round tables by the window to play scratch tickets. Donovan spent more than $2,000 a month on tickets at the White Hen, said Doyle.
St. John lives a couple of hundred yards behind the store in the Fox Brook Manor housing complex for the elderly. A retired jewelry worker, he spends much of his days visiting nearby stores and rummaging through the garbage for discarded lottery tickets. It is a hobby, says his lawyer, Scott Ambler, that has paid dividends in the past.
Many regular scratch ticket holders know that winning tickets have special coding, Ambler explains. If they are playing dozens of tickets at a time, many players might first scratch off the coding cover to see if their ticket is a winner and not scratch off the actual numbers until later to see how much they have won. But if they misread the coding, an otherwise winning ticket could end up in the trash.
Among St. John's discoveries, says Ambler, have been tickets worth $500 and possibly a $5,000 winner.
White Hen regular Dick "Ralphy" Vespa says he was in the store Oct. 10, playing a bunch of $10 Hold 'Em Poker tickets when Donovan came in and bought up a bunch as well.
"I says to him, 'I've played a bunch in that book and it's got nothing.' I came back an hour later and he was still here. I said: 'You're still in that same book?' "
According to his complaint to the Lottery Commission, Donovan said he bought 20 or 30 of the instant game tickets that morning, then left for about 15 minutes to get more money. On his return he asked the sales clerk whether anyone else had played Hold 'Em Poker in his absence. The clerk said she didn't think so and to confirm, the two compared the numbers on the tickets Donovan had already purchased with those tickets remaining on the roll behind the counter.
Donovan then bought the remaining seven tickets for $70.
It was Donovan's practice, says Doyle, to scratch the tickets at the store counter. Checking the ticket coding, he would then segregate the winners from the losers. He wouldn't know how much he won until later when he scratched off the rest of each ticket.
Donovan threw out all the tickets he thought were losers — including the million-dollar winner — and left the store.
Sometime later, St. John visited the store on his usual rounds, retrieved the tickets from the garbage bin and left.
St. John didn't know he had the $1 million ticket until that evening while scratching clear the numbers.
"He couldn't believe it," says his lawyer, Ambler. "He was in shock. The first thing he did was call his brother," who also rummages for disposed of winning lottery tickets. "He said, 'You'll never guess. I got one. I have a million-dollar ticket.' "
The next morning, St. John presented the ticket for validation at the White Hen and signed the back.
News of the winning ticket spread like wildfire. Everyone knew that St. John never bought tickets, says Vespa, and that Donovan was playing the roll of poker tickets the day before. Donovan's complaint says the store owner, Joseph Varin, contacted Donovan about the ticket and the following day, Oct. 12, Donovan filed a claim with the lottery, alleging he was the rightful owner of the ticket.
The lottery disagreed. In April, it ruled that a lottery ticket is like legal tender — possession is all that is required to prove ownership. But the suit filed by Donovan's children has hung up any payment to St. John.
St. John offered Donovan's children $100,000 of the ticket's winnings, says Doyle, but when the children asked for $150,000, he said no and withdrew his initial offer.
In December, while the Lottery Commission was debating the ownership of the ticket, Donovan's father, a community leader in Medway for years, died at age 88.
Donovan died less than two months later, on Jan. 31, in Hyannis.
"He was a wonderful man, very loyal and dedicated to his children," says former co-worker Stephanie Picchioni.
The loss of the ticket ate at him, Picchioni says.
"He was often making fun of himself and said he was going to have a T-shirt made up that said: 'I'm a million-dollar idiot."'
Edward St. John isn't all that much happier.
Tired of the criticism and "untruths" he says he has read in the newspapers, he doesn't talk much to anyone anymore about the ticket. And he hasn't been down to the White Hen since October.
"They're the cause of all this," he says. If the store hadn't informed Donovan about the found ticket, "none of this would have blown up."
Inside the White Hen, Dick "Ralphy" Vespa takes out his penknife and scratches at another ticket.
He feels the ticket rightfully belongs to St. John: "It was in the garbage and no one would have gotten it if he hadn't picked it up."
He plans on paying a bit more attention to his own tickets now.
Maybe I mis-read the article, but I only saw one person pass on in the article...The guy who contended original ownership . Where is the other death or person to whom you reference?
Maybe I mis-read the article, but I only saw one person pass on in the article...The guy who contended original ownership . Where is the other death or person to whom you reference?
That's why there should be NO such thing as an annuity-only game. TWO deaths are involved.
There's a prescription on the market for cash-only syndrome. The illness usually develops slowly as it destroys all logic and causes blurred vision.
This lawsuit has absolutely nothing to do with what kind of game he won. Any court could have kept St. John from spending his winnings. The case went to court to determine who was the rightful owner and if a ticket is truly a bearer instrument.
BTW, the medication is available in 5 and 10mg tablets or in liquid form. It can also be taken rectally for those who have trouble with asset allocation.
Maybe spent $2000/month included his winnings too. Spend and lose aren't the same, for example this evening I spent $10 on Ohio RC5 and won $1. When I cash in my ticket tomorrow and buy another ticket and lose, I will have spent $11 on RC5 but only lost $10.
That's why there should be NO such thing as an annuity-only game. TWO deaths are involved.
There's a prescription on the market for cash-only syndrome. The illness usually develops slowly as it destroys all logic and causes blurred vision.
This lawsuit has absolutely nothing to do with what kind of game he won. Any court could have kept St. John from spending his winnings. The case went to court to determine who was the rightful owner and if a ticket is truly a bearer instrument.
BTW, the medication is available in 5 and 10mg tablets or in liquid form. It can also be taken rectally for those who have trouble with asset allocation.
That's why there should be NO such thing as an annuity-only game. TWO deaths are involved.
There's a prescription on the market for cash-only syndrome. The illness usually develops slowly as it destroys all logic and causes blurred vision.
This lawsuit has absolutely nothing to do with what kind of game he won. Any court could have kept St. John from spending his winnings. The case went to court to determine who was the rightful owner and if a ticket is truly a bearer instrument.
BTW, the medication is available in 5 and 10mg tablets or in liquid form. It can also be taken rectally for those who have trouble with asset allocation.
I agree, I didn't read anything about cash payments in the article. lol.
That's why there should be NO such thing as an annuity-only game. TWO deaths are involved.
There's a prescription on the market for cash-only syndrome. The illness usually develops slowly as it destroys all logic and causes blurred vision.
This lawsuit has absolutely nothing to do with what kind of game he won. Any court could have kept St. John from spending his winnings. The case went to court to determine who was the rightful owner and if a ticket is truly a bearer instrument.
BTW, the medication is available in 5 and 10mg tablets or in liquid form. It can also be taken rectally for those who have trouble with asset allocation.
"Donovan, a mechanic on disability, worked part time at the Xtra gas station up the street. He was a big man who strode into the White Hen most days to sit among the regulars at the small round tables by the window to play scratch tickets. Donovan spent more than $2,000 a month on tickets at the White Hen, said Doyle.
____
My question is whether a person drawing disability payments is allowed to work part-time, and to what amount of $$$ are they allowed to have as income before having to pay back the overage to whatever entity was providing disability payments in the first place.
Seems to open up a whole can of worms regarding any assets Donovan's estate may have when the dust settles because if money is owed on the above basis, Donovan's kids may end up with zero anyway.
St. John's offer was more than generous and may have given them far more than they are going to get in the long run.
St. John has learned the hard way that, had he simply not mentioned that he found the ticket in the trash and just cashed it in as usual at lottery headquarters, NONE OF THIS WOULD NOW BE HAPPENING to him!
That would be why when Sassy and I go down to play scratch offs, it's always in pairs. We each check the ticket, and if we're at our regular store, they actually won't throw one of our tickets out without running it through their machine, even if we don't see that it's a winner. (Yes we're spoiled we know) lol
But I think the old guy's got the right idea, I'm sure that there are ALOT of people that throw those away without seeing it. And I don't see the issue with the annuity payments, it's smarter in the long run, you preserve yourself from going out and blowing all of it right away. And the guy that's got the money didn't die yet! lol
It is a wake up call though, ALWAYS DOUBLE AND TRIPLE CHECK THOSE TICKETS!!!!!!
St. John has learned the hard way that, had he simply not mentioned that he found the ticket in the trash and just cashed it in as usual at lottery headquarters, NONE OF THIS WOULD NOW BE HAPPENING to him!
And I guess the Donovans have learned the hard way never to throw a lottery ticket away until knowing for sure they are losers.
That's why there should be NO such thing as an annuity-only game. TWO deaths are involved.
There's a prescription on the market for cash-only syndrome. The illness usually develops slowly as it destroys all logic and causes blurred vision.
This lawsuit has absolutely nothing to do with what kind of game he won. Any court could have kept St. John from spending his winnings. The case went to court to determine who was the rightful owner and if a ticket is truly a bearer instrument.
BTW, the medication is available in 5 and 10mg tablets or in liquid form. It can also be taken rectally for those who have trouble with asset allocation.
6/20/2006
"JUST"....I really enjoyed reading your posting. You have always been one of my favorites, because of your knowledge, intelligence and of course "wit"......keep it up..
Wow this is funny, The only way the original owner should get the ticket back is if he/she signed the back of the ticket, If you are stupid enough to thow away $1 million dollars then you don't deserve to have the money in the first place. And why would you play scratchers anyways? they are no fun, you never win and the outcome is predetermined
6/20/2006
I really like your number series....are the first 3 digits based on B'days..7-16-20....??
Reading this story brought to mind my new (one of many favorites) TV show"WINDFALL" I don't care about the critics, this show has real life story lines,and gets better each week. Mr. St. John can certainly say, he just came into a "WINDFALL"....w/ all the drama attached to it that he probably never imagined(the drama that is)....he is being sued, like the group on the show....etc
Maybe spent $2000/month included his winnings too. Spend and lose aren't the same, for example this evening I spent $10 on Ohio RC5 and won $1. When I cash in my ticket tomorrow and buy another ticket and lose, I will have spent $11 on RC5 but only lost $10.
So you spent $10 and won $1 ($ -9.00) and when you buy your next ticket ( another $10 ticket??? ) if you don't win anything, you will have spent $20 but only lost $19. Or are you planning on spending only $1 on your next ticket? In which case then you will have spent $11 but only lost $10, yes.
Regardless, I still am trying to figure how the guy could spend basically $500/week on scratch-off tickets, while getting only a disability check and holding a part-time job. I work full time and no WAY I could afford anything like that. There are other expenses that must be met from what one makes. Somehow this guy must have been clearing a pretty whopping sum. I mean, isn't there even tax due on disability income?
That's why there should be NO such thing as an annuity-only game. TWO deaths are involved.
There's a prescription on the market for cash-only syndrome. The illness usually develops slowly as it destroys all logic and causes blurred vision.
This lawsuit has absolutely nothing to do with what kind of game he won. Any court could have kept St. John from spending his winnings. The case went to court to determine who was the rightful owner and if a ticket is truly a bearer instrument.
BTW, the medication is available in 5 and 10mg tablets or in liquid form. It can also be taken rectally for those who have trouble with asset allocation.
"It was Donovan's practice, says Doyle, to scratch the tickets at the store counter. Checking the ticket coding, he would then segregate the winners from the losers. He wouldn't know how much he won until later when he scratched off the rest of each ticket.
Donovan threw out all the tickets he thought were losers — including the million-dollar winner — and left the store."
The problem with relying on the codes is in MA they use the "loser" codes for the big winners (those over $600 which must be presented directly to the MA lottery for payment).
Personally I don't see why one would buy a scratch ticket then just scratch off the code (rather than scratch the winning #'s) - part of the idea of playing scratch tickets IMO is the fun of playing (not that I'd throw away the money gained from winning, mind you...LOL).
"It was Donovan's practice, says Doyle, to scratch the tickets at the store counter. Checking the ticket coding, he would then segregate the winners from the losers. He wouldn't know how much he won until later when he scratched off the rest of each ticket.
Donovan threw out all the tickets he thought were losers — including the million-dollar winner — and left the store."
The problem with relying on the codes is in MA they use the "loser" codes for the big winners (those over $600 which must be presented directly to the MA lottery for payment).
Personally I don't see why one would buy a scratch ticket then just scratch off the code (rather than scratch the winning #'s) - part of the idea of playing scratch tickets IMO is the fun of playing (not that I'd throw away the money gained from winning, mind you...LOL).
part of the idea of playing scratch tickets IMO is the fun of playing (not that I'd throw away the money gained from winning, mind you...LOL).
The description of how they do things down at the hen doesn't convey an image of anything I'd call fun.
The dead guy actually didn't know how much he was going to spend on tickets when he went to the store. Went home for more money so's to come back and buy $70 more worth of scratchers.
"Whew," Donavan thinks to himself. "I just enjoyed sitting here scratching the backs of these tickets and throwing the losers into the trash, I'm giddy with excitement."
Wonder how the rest of his day went after he scratched the other $70 he bought and presumably tossed after a quick look at the back.
If St. Johns hadn't found the winner and Donovan hadn't died a person can suppose he'd be down at the hen this morning scratching tickets, running to the house for more money, coming back scratching more tickets.
Riding the great mandala.
If there's any truth to the belief a person gets to examine how he spent his life during his last moments old Donovan must have gotten to enjoy scratching all those tickets one more time before the ejection seat shot him off into what comes next.
Actually, Rip, the prize codes on MA scratch tickets are not on the back - they're imbedded in the playfield on the front. After a few plays most players know where the codes are located on each ticket and can (if they want) just scratch those parts of the ticket which contain them.
"It was Donovan's practice, says Doyle, to scratch the tickets at the store counter. Checking the ticket coding, he would then segregate the winners from the losers. He wouldn't know how much he won until later when he scratched off the rest of each ticket.
Donovan threw out all the tickets he thought were losers — including the million-dollar winner — and left the store."
The problem with relying on the codes is in MA they use the "loser" codes for the big winners (those over $600 which must be presented directly to the MA lottery for payment).
Personally I don't see why one would buy a scratch ticket then just scratch off the code (rather than scratch the winning #'s) - part of the idea of playing scratch tickets IMO is the fun of playing (not that I'd throw away the money gained from winning, mind you...LOL).
part of the idea of playing scratch tickets IMO is the fun of playing (not that I'd throw away the money gained from winning, mind you...LOL).
The description of how they do things down at the hen doesn't convey an image of anything I'd call fun.
The dead guy actually didn't know how much he was going to spend on tickets when he went to the store. Went home for more money so's to come back and buy $70 more worth of scratchers.
"Whew," Donavan thinks to himself. "I just enjoyed sitting here scratching the backs of these tickets and throwing the losers into the trash, I'm giddy with excitement."
Wonder how the rest of his day went after he scratched the other $70 he bought and presumably tossed after a quick look at the back.
If St. Johns hadn't found the winner and Donovan hadn't died a person can suppose he'd be down at the hen this morning scratching tickets, running to the house for more money, coming back scratching more tickets.
Riding the great mandala.
If there's any truth to the belief a person gets to examine how he spent his life during his last moments old Donovan must have gotten to enjoy scratching all those tickets one more time before the ejection seat shot him off into what comes next.
J
HAPPY STAURDAY 6/24.."RIP".....
LOLOLOOLOLO........it's always a pleasure reading your postings on this forum...don't be such a stranger......you have always been one of my favorites........
In a way I feel sorry for his family and can understand why they think they have claim to the winning ticket. I agree that St John is the rightful owner, since the ticket would have been buried in a landfill had he not pulled it out of a trash can. However, if this story is really true, Donovan had a gambling problem. I can't imagine anyone spending $2,000 on scratch tickets every month, especially if he had a family. You can't really separate the effect stress has on the mind & the body. Knowing that he spent his disability check and countless hours of his life scratching for that big prize and totally blew it was probably what killed him. The anxiety (or depression) probably manifested itself as a heart attack. In the end, I hope he was a good, decent person and got the ultimate prize. Very, very sad.
In a way I feel sorry for his family and can understand why they think they have claim to the winning ticket. I agree that St John is the rightful owner, since the ticket would have been buried in a landfill had he not pulled it out of a trash can. However, if this story is really true, Donovan had a gambling problem. I can't imagine anyone spending $2,000 on scratch tickets every month, especially if he had a family. You can't really separate the effect stress has on the mind & the body. Knowing that he spent his disability check and countless hours of his life scratching for that big prize and totally blew it was probably what killed him. The anxiety (or depression) probably manifested itself as a heart attack. In the end, I hope he was a good, decent person and got the ultimate prize. Very, very sad.
You have such good insight and depth. You are willing to give him benefit of doubt. Donovan had a problem alright. I just never bought the idea tht he threw his ticket away. A million???? ? I have always thought that he was indecent and his hatefulness caused his demise. I said then and I say now, leave the old man alone less he be the next casuality.
That's why there should be NO such thing as an annuity-only game. TWO deaths are involved.
Maybe I mis-read the article, but I only saw one person pass on in the article...The guy who contended original ownership . Where is the other death or person to whom you reference?
Maybe I mis-read the article, but I only saw one person pass on in the article...The guy who contended original ownership . Where is the other death or person to whom you reference?
The man who just died had just lost his father.
That's why there should be NO such thing as an annuity-only game. TWO deaths are involved.
There's a prescription on the market for cash-only syndrome. The illness usually develops slowly as it destroys all logic and causes blurred vision.
This lawsuit has absolutely nothing to do with what kind of game he won. Any court could have kept St. John from spending his winnings. The case went to court to determine who was the rightful owner and if a ticket is truly a bearer instrument.
BTW, the medication is available in 5 and 10mg tablets or in liquid form. It can also be taken rectally for those who have trouble with asset allocation.
I'm still trying to figure how the guy spent $2,000 / month on scratch off tickets while he was on disability !
That must have been some disability paycheck ! A lot of people don't get that much per month on social security !
Maybe spent $2000/month included his winnings too. Spend and lose aren't the same, for example this evening I spent $10 on Ohio RC5 and won $1. When I cash in my ticket tomorrow and buy another ticket and lose, I will have spent $11 on RC5 but only lost $10.
That's why there should be NO such thing as an annuity-only game. TWO deaths are involved.
There's a prescription on the market for cash-only syndrome. The illness usually develops slowly as it destroys all logic and causes blurred vision.
This lawsuit has absolutely nothing to do with what kind of game he won. Any court could have kept St. John from spending his winnings. The case went to court to determine who was the rightful owner and if a ticket is truly a bearer instrument.
BTW, the medication is available in 5 and 10mg tablets or in liquid form. It can also be taken rectally for those who have trouble with asset allocation.
That's why there should be NO such thing as an annuity-only game. TWO deaths are involved.
There's a prescription on the market for cash-only syndrome. The illness usually develops slowly as it destroys all logic and causes blurred vision.
This lawsuit has absolutely nothing to do with what kind of game he won. Any court could have kept St. John from spending his winnings. The case went to court to determine who was the rightful owner and if a ticket is truly a bearer instrument.
BTW, the medication is available in 5 and 10mg tablets or in liquid form. It can also be taken rectally for those who have trouble with asset allocation.
I agree, I didn't read anything about cash payments in the article. lol.
"That's why there should be NO such thing as an annuity-only game. TWO deaths are involved."
Jack Whitaker took the cash-only, his granddaughter died.
That's why there should be NO such thing as an annuity-only game. TWO deaths are involved.
There's a prescription on the market for cash-only syndrome. The illness usually develops slowly as it destroys all logic and causes blurred vision.
This lawsuit has absolutely nothing to do with what kind of game he won. Any court could have kept St. John from spending his winnings. The case went to court to determine who was the rightful owner and if a ticket is truly a bearer instrument.
BTW, the medication is available in 5 and 10mg tablets or in liquid form. It can also be taken rectally for those who have trouble with asset allocation.
I give you a 5 star salute, JXP !!!
DD
"Donovan, a mechanic on disability, worked part time at the Xtra gas station up the street. He was a big man who strode into the White Hen most days to sit among the regulars at the small round tables by the window to play scratch tickets. Donovan spent more than $2,000 a month on tickets at the White Hen, said Doyle.
____
My question is whether a person drawing disability payments is allowed to work part-time, and to what amount of $$$ are they allowed to have as income before having to pay back the overage to whatever entity was providing disability payments in the first place.
Seems to open up a whole can of worms regarding any assets Donovan's estate may have when the dust settles because if money is owed on the above basis, Donovan's kids may end up with zero anyway.
St. John's offer was more than generous and may have given them far more than they are going to get in the long run.
St. John has learned the hard way that, had he simply not mentioned that he found the ticket in the trash and just cashed it in as usual at lottery headquarters, NONE OF THIS WOULD NOW BE HAPPENING to him!
That would be why when Sassy and I go down to play scratch offs, it's always in pairs. We each check the ticket, and if we're at our regular store, they actually won't throw one of our tickets out without running it through their machine, even if we don't see that it's a winner. (Yes we're spoiled we know)
lol
But I think the old guy's got the right idea, I'm sure that there are ALOT of people that throw those away without seeing it. And I don't see the issue with the annuity payments, it's smarter in the long run, you preserve yourself from going out and blowing all of it right away. And the guy that's got the money didn't die yet! lol
It is a wake up call though, ALWAYS DOUBLE AND TRIPLE CHECK THOSE TICKETS!!!!!!
St. John has learned the hard way that, had he simply not mentioned that he found the ticket in the trash and just cashed it in as usual at lottery headquarters, NONE OF THIS WOULD NOW BE HAPPENING to him!
And I guess the Donovans have learned the hard way never to throw a lottery ticket away until knowing for sure they are losers.
sad ,sad,sad
That's why there should be NO such thing as an annuity-only game. TWO deaths are involved.
There's a prescription on the market for cash-only syndrome. The illness usually develops slowly as it destroys all logic and causes blurred vision.
This lawsuit has absolutely nothing to do with what kind of game he won. Any court could have kept St. John from spending his winnings. The case went to court to determine who was the rightful owner and if a ticket is truly a bearer instrument.
BTW, the medication is available in 5 and 10mg tablets or in liquid form. It can also be taken rectally for those who have trouble with asset allocation.
6/20/2006
"JUST"....I really enjoyed reading your posting. You have always been one of my favorites, because of your knowledge, intelligence and of course "wit"......keep it up..
Wow this is funny, The only way the original owner should get the ticket back is if he/she signed the back of the ticket, If you are stupid enough to thow away $1 million dollars then you don't deserve to have the money in the first place. And why would you play scratchers anyways? they are no fun, you never win and the outcome is predetermined
6/20/2006
I really like your number series....are the first 3 digits based on B'days..7-16-20....??
6/20/2006
Reading this story brought to mind my new (one of many favorites) TV show"WINDFALL" I don't care about the critics, this show has real life story lines,and gets better each week. Mr. St. John can certainly say, he just came into a "WINDFALL"....w/ all the drama attached to it that he probably never imagined(the drama that is)....he is being sued, like the group on the show....etc
Maybe spent $2000/month included his winnings too. Spend and lose aren't the same, for example this evening I spent $10 on Ohio RC5 and won $1. When I cash in my ticket tomorrow and buy another ticket and lose, I will have spent $11 on RC5 but only lost $10.
So you spent $10 and won $1 ($ -9.00) and when you buy your next ticket ( another $10 ticket??? ) if you don't win anything, you will have spent $20 but only lost $19. Or are you planning on spending only $1 on your next ticket? In which case then you will have spent $11 but only lost $10, yes.
Regardless, I still am trying to figure how the guy could spend basically $500/week on scratch-off tickets, while getting only a disability check and holding a part-time job. I work full time and no WAY I could afford anything like that. There are other expenses that must be met from what one makes. Somehow this guy must have been clearing a pretty whopping sum. I mean, isn't there even tax due on disability income?
That's why there should be NO such thing as an annuity-only game. TWO deaths are involved.
There's a prescription on the market for cash-only syndrome. The illness usually develops slowly as it destroys all logic and causes blurred vision.
This lawsuit has absolutely nothing to do with what kind of game he won. Any court could have kept St. John from spending his winnings. The case went to court to determine who was the rightful owner and if a ticket is truly a bearer instrument.
BTW, the medication is available in 5 and 10mg tablets or in liquid form. It can also be taken rectally for those who have trouble with asset allocation.
Thanks everyone.
~Nancy
"It was Donovan's practice, says Doyle, to scratch the tickets at the store counter. Checking the ticket coding, he would then segregate the winners from the losers. He wouldn't know how much he won until later when he scratched off the rest of each ticket.
Donovan threw out all the tickets he thought were losers — including the million-dollar winner — and left the store."
The problem with relying on the codes is in MA they use the "loser" codes for the big winners (those over $600 which must be presented directly to the MA lottery for payment).
Personally I don't see why one would buy a scratch ticket then just scratch off the code (rather than scratch the winning #'s) - part of the idea of playing scratch tickets IMO is the fun of playing (not that I'd throw away the money gained from winning, mind you...LOL).
"It was Donovan's practice, says Doyle, to scratch the tickets at the store counter. Checking the ticket coding, he would then segregate the winners from the losers. He wouldn't know how much he won until later when he scratched off the rest of each ticket.
Donovan threw out all the tickets he thought were losers — including the million-dollar winner — and left the store."
The problem with relying on the codes is in MA they use the "loser" codes for the big winners (those over $600 which must be presented directly to the MA lottery for payment).
Personally I don't see why one would buy a scratch ticket then just scratch off the code (rather than scratch the winning #'s) - part of the idea of playing scratch tickets IMO is the fun of playing (not that I'd throw away the money gained from winning, mind you...LOL).
part of the idea of playing scratch tickets IMO is the fun of playing (not that I'd throw away the money gained from winning, mind you...LOL).
The description of how they do things down at the hen doesn't convey an image of anything I'd call fun.
The dead guy actually didn't know how much he was going to spend on tickets when he went to the store. Went home for more money so's to come back and buy $70 more worth of scratchers.
"Whew," Donavan thinks to himself. "I just enjoyed sitting here scratching the backs of these tickets and throwing the losers into the trash, I'm giddy with excitement."
Wonder how the rest of his day went after he scratched the other $70 he bought and presumably tossed after a quick look at the back.
If St. Johns hadn't found the winner and Donovan hadn't died a person can suppose he'd be down at the hen this morning scratching tickets, running to the house for more money, coming back scratching more tickets.
Riding the great mandala.
If there's any truth to the belief a person gets to examine how he spent his life during his last moments old Donovan must have gotten to enjoy scratching all those tickets one more time before the ejection seat shot him off into what comes next.
J
Actually, Rip, the prize codes on MA scratch tickets are not on the back - they're imbedded in the playfield on the front. After a few plays most players know where the codes are located on each ticket and can (if they want) just scratch those parts of the ticket which contain them.
"It was Donovan's practice, says Doyle, to scratch the tickets at the store counter. Checking the ticket coding, he would then segregate the winners from the losers. He wouldn't know how much he won until later when he scratched off the rest of each ticket.
Donovan threw out all the tickets he thought were losers — including the million-dollar winner — and left the store."
The problem with relying on the codes is in MA they use the "loser" codes for the big winners (those over $600 which must be presented directly to the MA lottery for payment).
Personally I don't see why one would buy a scratch ticket then just scratch off the code (rather than scratch the winning #'s) - part of the idea of playing scratch tickets IMO is the fun of playing (not that I'd throw away the money gained from winning, mind you...LOL).
part of the idea of playing scratch tickets IMO is the fun of playing (not that I'd throw away the money gained from winning, mind you...LOL).
The description of how they do things down at the hen doesn't convey an image of anything I'd call fun.
The dead guy actually didn't know how much he was going to spend on tickets when he went to the store. Went home for more money so's to come back and buy $70 more worth of scratchers.
"Whew," Donavan thinks to himself. "I just enjoyed sitting here scratching the backs of these tickets and throwing the losers into the trash, I'm giddy with excitement."
Wonder how the rest of his day went after he scratched the other $70 he bought and presumably tossed after a quick look at the back.
If St. Johns hadn't found the winner and Donovan hadn't died a person can suppose he'd be down at the hen this morning scratching tickets, running to the house for more money, coming back scratching more tickets.
Riding the great mandala.
If there's any truth to the belief a person gets to examine how he spent his life during his last moments old Donovan must have gotten to enjoy scratching all those tickets one more time before the ejection seat shot him off into what comes next.
J
HAPPY STAURDAY 6/24.."RIP".....
LOLOLOOLOLO........it's always a pleasure reading your postings on this forum...don't be such a stranger......you have always been one of my favorites........
In a way I feel sorry for his family and can understand why they think they have claim to the winning ticket. I agree that St John is the rightful owner, since the ticket would have been buried in a landfill had he not pulled it out of a trash can. However, if this story is really true, Donovan had a gambling problem. I can't imagine anyone spending $2,000 on scratch tickets every month, especially if he had a family. You can't really separate the effect stress has on the mind & the body. Knowing that he spent his disability check and countless hours of his life scratching for that big prize and totally blew it was probably what killed him. The anxiety (or depression) probably manifested itself as a heart attack. In the end, I hope he was a good, decent person and got the ultimate prize. Very, very sad.
In a way I feel sorry for his family and can understand why they think they have claim to the winning ticket. I agree that St John is the rightful owner, since the ticket would have been buried in a landfill had he not pulled it out of a trash can. However, if this story is really true, Donovan had a gambling problem. I can't imagine anyone spending $2,000 on scratch tickets every month, especially if he had a family. You can't really separate the effect stress has on the mind & the body. Knowing that he spent his disability check and countless hours of his life scratching for that big prize and totally blew it was probably what killed him. The anxiety (or depression) probably manifested itself as a heart attack. In the end, I hope he was a good, decent person and got the ultimate prize. Very, very sad.
You have such good insight and depth. You are willing to give him benefit of doubt. Donovan had a problem alright. I just never bought the idea tht he threw his ticket away. A million???? ? I have always thought that he was indecent and his hatefulness caused his demise. I said then and I say now, leave the old man alone less he be the next casuality.