Stone Mountain*Georgia United States
Member #828
November 2, 2002
10,491 Posts
Offline
Thank you Sysp34.
I was surprised that in 100 draws for ga. evening there were about 59 repeats of digits from the night before. I would have thought more would repeat.
A bigger surprise was the few repeats by position. (digits repeating on Top of each other) during the 100 days.
Position 1 Position 2 Position 3
7 10 6 >>>>> times per 100
I counted by eye sooo.. could be a couple of errors there but it is encouraging to find digits repeat on TOP of themself less than 10 % of the time. "Three Card Monty" seems good for Ga. Eve.
Thanks again for the figures.
The only real failure .....is the failure to try.
Luck is a very rare thing....... Odds not so much.
United States
Member #2,460
October 7, 2003
766 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by WIN D on Oct 16, 2006
Thank you Sysp34.
I was surprised that in 100 draws for ga. evening there were about 59 repeats of digits from the night before. I would have thought more would repeat.
A bigger surprise was the few repeats by position. (digits repeating on Top of each other) during the 100 days.
Position 1 Position 2 Position 3
7 10 6 >>>>> times per 100
I counted by eye sooo.. could be a couple of errors there but it is encouraging to find digits repeat on TOP of themself less than 10 % of the time. "Three Card Monty" seems good for Ga. Eve.
Thanks again for the figures.
WIN D
I didn't count the repeats myself, but it might be that many of the repeats per each position happened independently of the repeats of other positions.
I don't know if I worded that right.
What I mean is that filters' failures in one position add up to filters' failures in other positions.
So that particular filter could have failed on those 100 draws a total of from 10 to 23 draws, that is from a minimum of 10% to 23%, the correct figure (Actual) or percent has to perhaps be somewhere in between those two percent figures.
As I said, I didn't count the repeats myself, so I don't know in how many draws out of the 100 that particular filter failed.
But even at a maximum high of 23% the failures are kind of low enough for a filter that filters 30% of the total straight draws, as 30 - 20 = 10 = a 10 percent filters' "GAIN".
Chances are that the "Gain" might be higher than that if 2 positions failed together more often, then maybe the total draws failed could maybe have been about 16 or so instead of 20, but I don't know.
Stone Mountain*Georgia United States
Member #828
November 2, 2002
10,491 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by EXCALIBUR on Oct 16, 2006
WIN D
I didn't count the repeats myself, but it might be that many of the repeats per each position happened independently of the repeats of other positions.
I don't know if I worded that right.
What I mean is that filters' failures in one position add up to filters' failures in other positions.
So that particular filter could have failed on those 100 draws a total of from 10 to 23 draws, that is from a minimum of 10% to 23%, the correct figure (Actual) or percent has to perhaps be somewhere in between those two percent figures.
As I said, I didn't count the repeats myself, so I don't know in how many draws out of the 100 that particular filter failed.
But even at a maximum high of 23% the failures are kind of low enough for a filter that filters 30% of the total straight draws, as 30 - 20 = 10 = a 10 percent filters' "GAIN".
Chances are that the "Gain" might be higher than that if 2 positions failed together more often, then maybe the total draws failed could maybe have been about 16 or so instead of 20, but I don't know.
Good luck.
It's OK.... We can still say 3 card monty system works MOST of the time. Most of the time is the deal. Any time we can say most in Pick 3 ..... it's a good thing to know.
If I were at a train station saying our last good bye forever ..to a loved one and didn't have much time to say anything..... one of the things I would yell out as the train pulled out of the station would be...... "Good bye" ...... and ....
" Don't put your pick 3 digits in the same position 2 days in a row .....and you will be right .... MOST of the time" LOL
I'm just kidding ofcourse... I would actually yell out..."Remember to floss" and ..... "most dentist recommend that you don't play the same digits in the same position 2 days in a row.... LOL
P.S. Even if it's only safe to play this way ..... 75% of the time ...it's still a great filter. I also figure that during a 100 days of draws ....well over 10 per cent of the returning digits will hit at the same time anyway..... compressing the failure rate even more...... by returning ...2 at a time. Minimum....
The only real failure .....is the failure to try.
Luck is a very rare thing....... Odds not so much.
United States
Member #2,460
October 7, 2003
766 Posts
Offline
WIN D
You are right!
You know that it also works the other way.
When a filters' pattern fails way too much or way too often, then the thing is to play that pattern, unless it is a pattern that holds in it or has (Makes) too many pick 3 numbers, there of course has to be a balance between money spent and money won.
Good luck.
I will, after all, continue my last filters' thread as I have time and inspiration for it.
Stone Mountain*Georgia United States
Member #828
November 2, 2002
10,491 Posts
Offline
Thank you very much Sysp34. What a great screen shot that is. Very nice. So much info on one page and done with such great color separation.
If I could I would set up The 3 Card Monty on my software to switch the digit positions each day from the draw before..... Automatically! I would also have it with an over ride feature just in case.
Thanks again.... nice work.
The only real failure .....is the failure to try.
Luck is a very rare thing....... Odds not so much.