lottosync 1.6 breakthrough??Prev TopicNext Topic

• luckyhorse

  

  Canada
  Member #1,888
  July 20, 2003
  184 Posts
  Offline
  May 10, 2007, 10:04 pm

  ▲▼

  i maybe found the missing link that can make this program run to full potential i went through the diffrenet sample sizes and found my computer seems to hit the numbers when a sample size is between 150-200 because my computer is slower it seems to run better with lower sample sizes for example back testing the last 2 draws i found it hit 3/10 and then a 4/10 just missing ther fifth number i thinkl the ideal sample sizes will vary from computer to computer it will be up to you the user to back test to see if your perfect sample size exists  remember  is just a test the next few draws i test may just turn to nothing but fluff!!!
• paul762

  

  United Kingdom
  Member #3,002
  December 11, 2003
  542 Posts
  Offline
  May 11, 2007, 7:11 am

  ▲▼

  I remember saying something a while ago to Vick about the lower samples seeming to be more accurate? however when i tested it, it was more in the 400-600 range for my pc (3.4ghz).

  This still doesnt solve the problem of not predicting numbers from the last draw though, and I seemed to have more luck when using the lower samples and doing numerous predictions until 6-10 numbers repeated the most, and then playing those numbers. But I used it for the Irish Lotto most of the time.

  However I dont use lottosync at all anymore, I currently just use lotterycracker.
• luckyhorse

  

  Canada
  Member #1,888
  July 20, 2003
  184 Posts
  Offline
  May 12, 2007, 11:14 pm

  ▲▼

  yep sample size of 200 for my computer seems to work best hit 4/10 in canada 6/49 tonight
• vick

  

  Canada
  Member #2,859
  November 23, 2003
  463 Posts
  Offline
  May 13, 2007, 12:36 am

  ▲▼

  seems like your computer's tuned best for 200 samples luckyhorse -

   

  i'm going to do some back test for ontario 49 and check

   

  but STILL WAITING FOR 1.8
• irondoor827

  United States
  Member #51,686
  April 19, 2007
  200 Posts
  Offline
  May 13, 2007, 3:34 am

  ▲▼
  In response to luckyhorse

  Quote: Originally posted by luckyhorse on May 10, 2007

  i maybe found the missing link that can make this program run to full potential i went through the diffrenet sample sizes and found my computer seems to hit the numbers when a sample size is between 150-200 because my computer is slower it seems to run better with lower sample sizes for example back testing the last 2 draws i found it hit 3/10 and then a 4/10 just missing ther fifth number i thinkl the ideal sample sizes will vary from computer to computer it will be up to you the user to back test to see if your perfect sample size exists  remember  is just a test the next few draws i test may just turn to nothing but fluff!!!

  sounds  good
• paul762

  

  United Kingdom
  Member #3,002
  December 11, 2003
  542 Posts
  Offline
  May 13, 2007, 4:50 am

  ▲▼
  In response to luckyhorse

  Quote: Originally posted by luckyhorse on May 12, 2007

  yep sample size of 200 for my computer seems to work best hit 4/10 in canada 6/49 tonight

  I wonder if this lower sample will only provide lower tier prizes like 3's and 4's ? maybe the higher samples provide the higher prizes after a longer playing time ?

  Good Luck anyway!
• LANTERN

  

  Tx
  United States
  Member #4,570
  May 4, 2004
  5,180 Posts
  Offline
  May 16, 2007, 4:40 am

  ▲▼
  In response to vick

  Quote: Originally posted by vick on May 13, 2007

  seems like your computer's tuned best for 200 samples luckyhorse -

   

  i'm going to do some back test for ontario 49 and check

   

  but STILL WAITING FOR 1.8

  Vick

  It seems to me that by now it is clear that any newer versions of
  LottoSync if there are any are only for Marco's own use and that all
  or most of us will never get them, but nothing is for sure.

  BibleOnline  ParishesOnline  ChristianRadioOnline   MassOnline   Mass

  "Ten measures of beauty descended to the world, nine were taken by Jerusalem."
• moeman

  

  United States
  Member #52,158
  May 13, 2007
  77 Posts
  Offline
  May 17, 2007, 7:54 pm

  ▲▼

  I am not computer savy but what has the speed got to with it.Programs are written by commands.How can the speed change the outcome and if it does how can the system seller or writer of the program  make claims as the outcome of the method.