Tennessee Lottery was slow to act, even after repeated warnings from many players; many call for the return of real lottery drawings
The Tennessee Lottery appears to have been slow to investigate reports of a major flaw in its new computerized drawing system, even in the face of multiple warnings from players.
Lee Lemonds and his wife watch "The Wheel of Fortune" every night and because the lottery drawing comes on the same television station, they usually see it as well.
It didn't take long for the longtime Hendersonville resident to notice something was just not right.
"Ever since they changed from the ping-pong ball system to the computer, no numbers with two or more like digits were showing up," Lemmonds said, adding statistically that just did not make sense.
"Statistics show that at least 28 percent of the time there should be two or more like digits," the retired engineer and businessman said.
Lemmonds was so concerned over what he saw as a statistically impossibility that Monday he sent a letter to the station manager at WKRN, the television station that broadcasts the lottery drawings.
By Tuesday reports were surfacing that indeed there had been a glitch in the system.
Other Tennesseans say they also voiced concerns about the Cash 3 and Cash 4 games operated by the Tennessee State Lottery.
Some say they were ignored for days, or even weeks, while the computer glitch remained.
Lottery officials announced Tuesday that there had in fact been an error that kept duplicate numbers from being drawn. It was caused, they said, by a keypunch mistake. The problem has since been fixed.
In the very frist drawing after the correction, a duplicate number appeared in the Cash 4 drawing.
In his letter to the television station, Lemmonds questioned the lack of duplicate numbers.
"Since you have changed the method of the drawings, there have been 41 drawings.
None of the drawings have contained two or more like digits," Lemmonds wrote.
[Editor: There were actually a total of 82 Cash 3 and Cash 4 drawings to that point, since the flawed computerized drawing system was installed.]
According to lottery officials, the problem came from Smartplay International Inc, the company that makes the random number generating software.
That company began an investigation when state lottery officials contacted them.
The Tennessee Lottery did not state whether or not they conduct their own series of test draws. They also did not state why they waited at least 10 days to begin investigating the issue, after the first reports started coming in of flawed drawings.
Players on the Lottery Post web site have called for a boycott of the Tennessee Lottery games until the lottery reverts back to real lottery drawings, with mechanical ball machines. They refer to similar flawed drawings in other states, all stemming from the installation of computerized drawing systems.
According to the long-time lottery players, real lottery drawings using ball machines are easy to witness, and problems are more easily discoverable.
The Lottery Post web site maintains a list of all games played inthe United States, Canada, and United Kingdom, and whether they use genuine lottery drawings or computerized drawings. (See https://www.lotterypost.com/lottery-report-card.asp for State Lottery Report Card.)
Lemmonds, who said he does not play Cash3 or Cash 4, said he just hopes the problem is fixed as it impacted many players.
"I can't say I was surprised," he said, adding he hopes a similar problem does not occur again.
some people arent just boycotting the pick3,4 and lotto 5 some people are boycotting even the powerball and scratch offs that are not RNG related just so tennessee can see the players arent happy right now.
"The Tennessee Lottery did not state whether or not they conduct their own series of test draws."
I thought that after complaints were made the lottery officials said they DID do test draws and that they came up with doubles. People reading this article will be misinformed. Such is media these days...
Quote: Originally posted by Rocket 455 on Aug 24, 2007
"The Tennessee Lottery did not state whether or not they conduct their own series of test draws."
I thought that after complaints were made the lottery officials said they DID do test draws and that they came up with doubles. People reading this article will be misinformed. Such is media these days...
If you go to Tennessean.com and look for the search feature in the upper right hand corner of the page then click news and type in lottery you will get everything they printed about their lottery problems since starting the RNG software.
You know what this reminds me of, Superman III. In the movie near the beginning, the Daily Planet had a raffle for a trip to South America. It was called 'Jingo', a simple mechanical ball drawn machine with a number inside the ball. The objective was to match 4 different numbers. During the picking, Mr. White says, 'Could we get a computer to do this?' Later near the end, they did get a computer. It blew-up during the draw; smoke came rolling out... lol... I can just imagine seeing this going on at the Tennessee Lottery Headquarters; smoke everywhere, jaws dropped in disbelief that it actually failed.
Quote: Originally posted by Rocket 455 on Aug 24, 2007
"The Tennessee Lottery did not state whether or not they conduct their own series of test draws."
I thought that after complaints were made the lottery officials said they DID do test draws and that they came up with doubles. People reading this article will be misinformed. Such is media these days...
No, that's not true. The lottery did not officially state if they conducted test draws. You are thinking of the e-mail replies that went out -- which are NOT the same thing as making a statement.
The "media" (which is me in this case, since I wrote it) is being very precise in the wording, and it is a very important point. The lottery may be in a bind, because either they tested it or they didn't, and no matter which position they take (when they eventually take a position), they will have conflicted earlier statements.
Thus, they are saying nothing on the issue, and hoping that people will not notice. I have noticed.
Quote: Originally posted by tnlotto1 on Aug 24, 2007
some people arent just boycotting the pick3,4 and lotto 5 some people are boycotting even the powerball and scratch offs that are not RNG related just so tennessee can see the players arent happy right now.
Good point, and good for you. I'm glad that this issue is making people stand up and take notice. It is upsetting to think that any lottery could get away with this by temporarily offering up a mere 20% prize increase. Then, it's back to business as usual. Maybe if enough people hold on to their money they will be force to do something mroe radical. Perhaps maybe even to listen to the players, who almost universally hate computerized drawings.
Lemmonds, who said he does not play Cash3 or Cash 4, said he just hopes the problem is fixed as it impacted many players.
"I can't say I was surprised," he said, adding he hopes a similar problem does not occur again.
____________________________________
It's a pretty sad commentary when someone who doesn't even play the daily games notices the same anomalies we see in these faux drawings. Unfortunately, we know with relative certainty that this will happen again, whether in Tennessee's lottery or in the next state to jump on the "industry trends" bandwagon.
There is only ONE reason that state lotteries would switch from mechanical drawings to electronic RNG's: It makes it much easier to control and manipulate their payouts in order to maximize profits. The lotteries have a built-in shield which protects them from close scrutiny; most people simply refuse to believe their state officials could be so blatantly dishonest. They argue, "The lotteries would never do anything like that intentionally, because look at what would happen if they got caught."
Well, I can only say that they've already been caught many, many times, and we all know what happened in every single instance: Nothing. "Don't be ridiculous," they tell us, "it was a simple programming error, and it wasn't even our fault. There is no conspiracy to limit payouts and you're being paranoid. Besides, given the level of integrity we claim to observe, you can be assured that if this ever happens again, we'll take any steps necessary to see that you don't find out about it."
Okay. But what about Minnesota? What about Colorado? What about Delaware? What about Indiana? What about ... "Yeah, yeah; we've all heard those urban legends and horror stories from other states that use electronic drawing machines, but that doesn't mean they're not reliable. RNG's are fast becoming the industry standard, and we don't want to be left behind. Look at how cool they are!"
I can't keep other people from playing their state's lottery games. I can only refuse to give them MY money, so I haven't played a single Hoosier Lottery game since June 4, 2003, when sales manager Marina Bookout told me that the Hoosier Lottery tracks player selections as they're being sold. No other lottery in the country does this. Each of us must step up and vote his own conscience; if you don't believe these machines can be manipulated, nothing I say here will convince you otherwise, and so I'll wish you lots of luck. On the other hand, if you've seen the evidence LosingJeff and I have posted here on the forum, if you've read the myriad of news stories Todd has posted, you know what these RNG's and their keepers are capable of (pardon my grammar). They KNOW that if anyone questions their methods, all they have to do is play the paranoia card, and it will all go away in a few days.
This trend will continue unchallenged unless and until we secure federal legislation which bans their use in any state-sponsored lottery game. This isn't going to happen until the rest of you get fed up enough to put your names on Todd's petition. LotteryPost.com IS the Players' Lobby. We have members from all over the world, and many of you are experts on your chosen games. We CAN make this happen, because there is no greater collection of lottery players anywhere on the globe. Sending emails and making phone calls is fast and easy, but writing a certified letter is much more satisfying, and your message will last longer in the mind of the recipient. When enough letters begin pouring into the lottery's mailbox, they'll be forced to recognize us. Anyone can delete an email or hang up a phone, but how many of us can pitch an unopened certified letter?
Anything worth doing is worth some effort, so open a blank document and start typing. It'll cost you two lottery tickets and change to send your letter via Certified Mail but, if you live in Tennessee or Indiana, the tickets you'll sacrifice were probably losers, anyway.
The time for us to pull together is here. If we unite for this common cause, we can and will achieve our objectives; if we continue on our current, individual paths of isolationism, we'll have only ourselves to blame when more states embrace and adopt this technology.
I have to commend those Lottery Post members and non-members who brought this issue up here and with the Tennessee Lottery. They could have said nothing knowing the problem existed and made a nice tidy profit from Tennessee Lottery's self-induced ignorance. My hat is off to you. You showed the lottery officials and the public what honesty and integrity looks like.
No, that's not true. The lottery did not officially state if they conducted test draws. You are thinking of the e-mail replies that went out -- which are NOT the same thing as making a statement.
The "media" (which is me in this case, since I wrote it) is being very precise in the wording, and it is a very important point. The lottery may be in a bind, because either they tested it or they didn't, and no matter which position they take (when they eventually take a position), they will have conflicted earlier statements.
Thus, they are saying nothing on the issue, and hoping that people will not notice. I have noticed.
I apologizefor assuming that the H'ville Star News left out the part of the emails stating that the TN Lottery had indeed done tests. At any rate, e-mails these days must have SOME validity or else so many people at the top wouldn't be deleting them left and right. Yes it's very important that the players who threw down their good money on doubles and triples get the whole story. Thank you Todd for doing your part! I'll try to read the whole post before commenting in the future.
Quote: Originally posted by Rocket 455 on Aug 24, 2007
I apologizefor assuming that the H'ville Star News left out the part of the emails stating that the TN Lottery had indeed done tests. At any rate, e-mails these days must have SOME validity or else so many people at the top wouldn't be deleting them left and right. Yes it's very important that the players who threw down their good money on doubles and triples get the whole story. Thank you Todd for doing your part! I'll try to read the whole post before commenting in the future.
There are several ways that I put together news stories. Sometimes I write them myself. Sometimes I post directly from another media source. And sometimes I put together a piece that uses bits from other sources, and the rest I write myself.
The article able is the third type of story. If you check the Source at the bottom you will see "Huntsville Star News, Lottery Post Staff". That means I took bits from the Huntsville Star News story, and wrote the rest myself. So to say that the HSN left out something is not really the case, since the story is really my own doing. If anyone left something out, it was me.
However, I don't think there was anything left out. An e-mail sent to people from an unknown source within the lottery is not a verified news source. Many times such e-mails are written by underlings, without direct input from officials. That would not make it an "official" statement. It's more like good info that should be confirmed by an official. The information posted to their web site can be considered "official".
I am indeed trying to get the whole story. I think that much is apparent. I am also trying to do so in a way that exposes as much as possible, while remaining ethical and factual.
I hope this clears things up. It's not an exact science.
Quote: Originally posted by four4me on Aug 24, 2007
If you go to Tennessean.com and look for the search feature in the upper right hand corner of the page then click news and type in lottery you will get everything they printed about their lottery problems since starting the RNG software.
Why would Tenn. change the system. People keep buying tickets and the MSM doesn't report the story. So far it looks like a very profitable system for Tenn. You can't expect modern journalists to cover something as difficult as mathmatics.
For the record random.org has a good explaination as to why computer based RNGs are not used in scientific research and truely random generators that are used by no current lottery. None of the current computer based lottery RNGs are random so it's all a guess as to how much favor the state is getting in each case.
Quote: Originally posted by dvdiva on Aug 25, 2007
Why would Tenn. change the system. People keep buying tickets and the MSM doesn't report the story. So far it looks like a very profitable system for Tenn. You can't expect modern journalists to cover something as difficult as mathmatics.
For the record random.org has a good explaination as to why computer based RNGs are not used in scientific research and truely random generators that are used by no current lottery. None of the current computer based lottery RNGs are random so it's all a guess as to how much favor the state is getting in each case.
Hot Lotto (MUSL) uses a radioactive decay method for their RNG, which I believe is considered truly random. However that's only one part of the equation. The other part is unsolvable: computers can be hacked.
Ask around to any person knowledgeable about writing programming for computers and they will tell you that computers can't really randomize numbers. They are Pseudo-Random. Meaning they have a pattern and are never really random at all. It isn't possible to do.
Pseudo-Random was discovered during WWII when the Germans code was broke that they used to send what they thought to be random lettering that only the receiving machine could decipher. The first computer ever made was the size of a factory and used to break their code.
Still today computers can't make anything totally random without making a pattern. *i was going to add an url that tells more about it but the rules here won't allow me to do that*
This is the reason that a computer was never used in the first place for the lottery.
I'm very surprised that the news stations haven’t looked into this tidbit of information yet.
Quote: Originally posted by Google Junky on Aug 25, 2007
Ask around to any person knowledgeable about writing programming for computers and they will tell you that computers can't really randomize numbers. They are Pseudo-Random. Meaning they have a pattern and are never really random at all. It isn't possible to do.
Pseudo-Random was discovered during WWII when the Germans code was broke that they used to send what they thought to be random lettering that only the receiving machine could decipher. The first computer ever made was the size of a factory and used to break their code.
Still today computers can't make anything totally random without making a pattern. *i was going to add an url that tells more about it but the rules here won't allow me to do that*
This is the reason that a computer was never used in the first place for the lottery.
I'm very surprised that the news stations haven’t looked into this tidbit of information yet.
Good luck in all you do, Google Junky
that is interesting google junky because i saw a special on vegas cheaters on the travel channel and they talked about hackers figuring out how to break the code of the slot machines because the slot machines arent really random and any sequence can be predicted. the guy who was busted use to make the slot machines so he knew exactly how to predict the winners. i didnt know the lottery computers worked the same way but i knew i didnt want tennessee to go RNG
There are several ways that I put together news stories. Sometimes I write them myself. Sometimes I post directly from another media source. And sometimes I put together a piece that uses bits from other sources, and the rest I write myself.
The article able is the third type of story. If you check the Source at the bottom you will see "Huntsville Star News, Lottery Post Staff". That means I took bits from the Huntsville Star News story, and wrote the rest myself. So to say that the HSN left out something is not really the case, since the story is really my own doing. If anyone left something out, it was me.
However, I don't think there was anything left out. An e-mail sent to people from an unknown source within the lottery is not a verified news source. Many times such e-mails are written by underlings, without direct input from officials. That would not make it an "official" statement. It's more like good info that should be confirmed by an official. The information posted to their web site can be considered "official".
I am indeed trying to get the whole story. I think that much is apparent. I am also trying to do so in a way that exposes as much as possible, while remaining ethical and factual.
I hope this clears things up. It's not an exact science.
That is a nice point about the email replies that the lottery gave. But why did they even reply or have someone reply back if their email reply meant nothing. Somebody had to tell who ever responded to the emails something to tell the public in the first place so I don't believe that crap. Besides there were several days that had passed since the email was sent and the reply came back., granted I did send my email in to them on a Sat. Yes, they could say it was the weekend, but I didn't get a reply back until Wed. That was plenty of time for me to beleive they tested the machine like they said they did. The TN lottery is trying to dodge everything as if they were angels naive to all that happened. They pull this crap about in the past the midday draw went 16 days or so without a double, well that was the randomness of a ball drawing and people could understand that because doubles did fall in the other games. Like someone else posted in this thread, I think TN will have the quads come out soon to try and shut people up. Well when they do fall I will be happy to all who chose to continue to get ripped off by this so called RNG game that they have more control over, but Rebecca and her crew won't get a bonus from me. As far as I'm concerned Tn has only one lottery game, "Powerball" and that is all I will play there. 1$ with a power play. and with the jackpot at 300 mil I will play 3 plays tonight.
I think you make a great point about the e-mail as a verifiable news source. And I certainly understand and agree with you as to getting to the facts and remaining ethical. But Like Mystikal I gotta wonder:
1. Who at the Tennessee Lottery sent those emails and what is the source of their authority to respond in such a manner?
2. From whom and where did they get their information?
3. Did someone in a position of authority at the Tennessee Lottery provide the information and authorize the sending of said e-mails?
I must reiterate that this is the best chance ever to discredit the propaganda of the wonderfullness of RNG's and therefore, rid ourselves of them forever. And if it has to be done by discrediting the Tennessee Lottery then I say so be it. They brought this on themseves and they must be held accountable for their actions and their words.
I really hope the mainstream press and the people of Tennessee don't just roll over and accept this nonsense. There are too many unanswered questions here and too many contradictions to just let it fade away.
It is obvious to me that the Tennessee Lottery has no credibility in this matter and that should be exploited. Just look at the following:
1. They said a glitch like this could never happen but it did.
2. They said the program was flawed and could not produce doubles But they (at least someone affiliated with the Tennessee Lottery) said they tested the program and they got doubles during the test.
3. They said it is not uncommon for doubles to occur for long periods of time and cited examples that were proven to be false.
Like Mystikal said they are trying to dodge everything and they need to be hammered with their own words!
Quote: Originally posted by Uncle Jim on Aug 26, 2007
Todd,
I think you make a great point about the e-mail as a verifiable news source. And I certainly understand and agree with you as to getting to the facts and remaining ethical. But Like Mystikal I gotta wonder:
1. Who at the Tennessee Lottery sent those emails and what is the source of their authority to respond in such a manner?
2. From whom and where did they get their information?
3. Did someone in a position of authority at the Tennessee Lottery provide the information and authorize the sending of said e-mails?
I must reiterate that this is the best chance ever to discredit the propaganda of the wonderfullness of RNG's and therefore, rid ourselves of them forever. And if it has to be done by discrediting the Tennessee Lottery then I say so be it. They brought this on themseves and they must be held accountable for their actions and their words.
I really hope the mainstream press and the people of Tennessee don't just roll over and accept this nonsense. There are too many unanswered questions here and too many contradictions to just let it fade away.
It is obvious to me that the Tennessee Lottery has no credibility in this matter and that should be exploited. Just look at the following:
1. They said a glitch like this could never happen but it did.
2. They said the program was flawed and could not produce doubles But they (at least someone affiliated with the Tennessee Lottery) said they tested the program and they got doubles during the test.
3. They said it is not uncommon for doubles to occur for long periods of time and cited examples that were proven to be false.
Like Mystikal said they are trying to dodge everything and they need to be hammered with their own words!
Jim
UJ, I agree, and I have stated the same points in other posts. If you go back and see my previous posts when the story was breaking, I believe I was the first to raise these issues -- about the conflict in statements coming from the lottery. My comments above were strictly related to the writing of news stories, not my personal opinions.
I think many email responses are generic in nature meaning that depending on the question. They have a list of answers and whomever is handling the emails just simply clicks on the appropriate reply or the next best reply to a question.
Rarely will a person get a detailed specific personally typed reply from them.
From talking to different people whom have worked for the lottery in my home town. There are literally hundreds of emails form people mostly complaints about why their numbers don't come out why triples haven't been drawn, when are you going to draw my numbers. I was one number off every other day home come you didn't draw my picks, the lottery is ripping me off. Stuff like this.
So my guess is whomever is handling the emails desk dreads having to reply individually to each and every email and that's why we get generic replies.
Over the years having been asked the same questions over and over they have created a list of automated responses. And for the most part the average person wouldn't know it was an automated response unless they have emailed the lottery in the past and got a similar response.
Moreover just about all the lottery's use the same type responses especially the one that says
Quote: we value the integrity of our games and do everything to insure ------- yadda yadda.
So what's going on with this mess in Tennessee now? In the last few days I haven't seen any stories, news or comments? Are there any updates or is this story going to die? A lot of outrage and then business as usual?
My first thought ...... if I were entertaining changing from normal draws to computer draws would be .....How would we make sure the draws were RANDOM ?
Someone selling me software for my lottery drawings would have to convince me there were "Checks and Balances" in place .. that would ALERT on NON random events taking place each day for several days in a row.
There is software that test such things ! Where was it? Am I crazzzzy or shouldn't this be normal operating procedure in all these computer drawing softwares?
Why should ....... "Lay people" have to be the ones doing the Alerts... and getting ignored by the STATE? History has shown....Americans don't like to be ignored by the Government very much!
Quote: Originally posted by Uncle Jim on Aug 28, 2007
So what's going on with this mess in Tennessee now? In the last few days I haven't seen any stories, news or comments? Are there any updates or is this story going to die? A lot of outrage and then business as usual?
i'm pretty sure there won't be too much time that elapses before there is a new 'flaw' tennessee discovers.they'll do the same thing as they did last time.nothing until they have to......
some people arent just boycotting the pick3,4 and lotto 5 some people are boycotting even the powerball and scratch offs that are not RNG related just so tennessee can see the players arent happy right now.
"The Tennessee Lottery did not state whether or not they conduct their own series of test draws."
I thought that after complaints were made the lottery officials said they DID do test draws and that they came up with doubles. People reading this article will be misinformed. Such is media these days...
If you go to Tennessean.com and look for the search feature in the upper right hand corner of the page then click news and type in lottery you will get everything they printed about their lottery problems since starting the RNG software.
First, all the Lottery officials say computer RNG
software is the best invention since Tennessee......."whiskey"
Now the Lottery officials say it is............................"FIXED"
??????????????????????????????
WARNING RNG could be bad for your wallet:
You know what this reminds me of, Superman III. In the movie near the beginning, the Daily Planet had a raffle for a trip to South America. It was called 'Jingo', a simple mechanical ball drawn machine with a number inside the ball. The objective was to match 4 different numbers. During the picking, Mr. White says, 'Could we get a computer to do this?' Later near the end, they did get a computer. It blew-up during the draw; smoke came rolling out... lol... I can just imagine seeing this going on at the Tennessee Lottery Headquarters; smoke everywhere, jaws dropped in disbelief that it actually failed.
I wonder if anyone who discovered this early tried to take advantage of it by not picking sets with duplicates.
No, that's not true. The lottery did not officially state if they conducted test draws. You are thinking of the e-mail replies that went out -- which are NOT the same thing as making a statement.
The "media" (which is me in this case, since I wrote it) is being very precise in the wording, and it is a very important point. The lottery may be in a bind, because either they tested it or they didn't, and no matter which position they take (when they eventually take a position), they will have conflicted earlier statements.
Thus, they are saying nothing on the issue, and hoping that people will not notice. I have noticed.
Good point, and good for you. I'm glad that this issue is making people stand up and take notice. It is upsetting to think that any lottery could get away with this by temporarily offering up a mere 20% prize increase. Then, it's back to business as usual. Maybe if enough people hold on to their money they will be force to do something mroe radical. Perhaps maybe even to listen to the players, who almost universally hate computerized drawings.
from the article:
Lemmonds, who said he does not play Cash3 or Cash 4, said he just hopes the problem is fixed as it impacted many players.
"I can't say I was surprised," he said, adding he hopes a similar problem does not occur again.
____________________________________
It's a pretty sad commentary when someone who doesn't even play the daily games notices the same anomalies we see in these faux drawings. Unfortunately, we know with relative certainty that this will happen again, whether in Tennessee's lottery or in the next state to jump on the "industry trends" bandwagon.
There is only ONE reason that state lotteries would switch from mechanical drawings to electronic RNG's: It makes it much easier to control and manipulate their payouts in order to maximize profits. The lotteries have a built-in shield which protects them from close scrutiny; most people simply refuse to believe their state officials could be so blatantly dishonest. They argue, "The lotteries would never do anything like that intentionally, because look at what would happen if they got caught."
Well, I can only say that they've already been caught many, many times, and we all know what happened in every single instance: Nothing. "Don't be ridiculous," they tell us, "it was a simple programming error, and it wasn't even our fault. There is no conspiracy to limit payouts and you're being paranoid. Besides, given the level of integrity we claim to observe, you can be assured that if this ever happens again, we'll take any steps necessary to see that you don't find out about it."
Okay. But what about Minnesota? What about Colorado? What about Delaware? What about Indiana? What about ... "Yeah, yeah; we've all heard those urban legends and horror stories from other states that use electronic drawing machines, but that doesn't mean they're not reliable. RNG's are fast becoming the industry standard, and we don't want to be left behind. Look at how cool they are!"
I can't keep other people from playing their state's lottery games. I can only refuse to give them MY money, so I haven't played a single Hoosier Lottery game since June 4, 2003, when sales manager Marina Bookout told me that the Hoosier Lottery tracks player selections as they're being sold. No other lottery in the country does this. Each of us must step up and vote his own conscience; if you don't believe these machines can be manipulated, nothing I say here will convince you otherwise, and so I'll wish you lots of luck. On the other hand, if you've seen the evidence LosingJeff and I have posted here on the forum, if you've read the myriad of news stories Todd has posted, you know what these RNG's and their keepers are capable of (pardon my grammar). They KNOW that if anyone questions their methods, all they have to do is play the paranoia card, and it will all go away in a few days.
This trend will continue unchallenged unless and until we secure federal legislation which bans their use in any state-sponsored lottery game. This isn't going to happen until the rest of you get fed up enough to put your names on Todd's petition. LotteryPost.com IS the Players' Lobby. We have members from all over the world, and many of you are experts on your chosen games. We CAN make this happen, because there is no greater collection of lottery players anywhere on the globe. Sending emails and making phone calls is fast and easy, but writing a certified letter is much more satisfying, and your message will last longer in the mind of the recipient. When enough letters begin pouring into the lottery's mailbox, they'll be forced to recognize us. Anyone can delete an email or hang up a phone, but how many of us can pitch an unopened certified letter?
Anything worth doing is worth some effort, so open a blank document and start typing. It'll cost you two lottery tickets and change to send your letter via Certified Mail but, if you live in Tennessee or Indiana, the tickets you'll sacrifice were probably losers, anyway.
The time for us to pull together is here. If we unite for this common cause, we can and will achieve our objectives; if we continue on our current, individual paths of isolationism, we'll have only ourselves to blame when more states embrace and adopt this technology.
I have to commend those Lottery Post members and non-members who brought this issue up here and with the Tennessee Lottery. They could have said nothing knowing the problem existed and made a nice tidy profit from Tennessee Lottery's self-induced ignorance. My hat is off to you. You showed the lottery officials and the public what honesty and integrity looks like.
I apologize for assuming that the H'ville Star News left out the part of the emails stating that the TN Lottery had indeed done tests. At any rate, e-mails these days must have SOME validity or else so many people at the top wouldn't be deleting them left and right. Yes it's very important that the players who threw down their good money on doubles and triples get the whole story. Thank you Todd for doing your part! I'll try to read the whole post before commenting in the future.
There are several ways that I put together news stories. Sometimes I write them myself. Sometimes I post directly from another media source. And sometimes I put together a piece that uses bits from other sources, and the rest I write myself.
The article able is the third type of story. If you check the Source at the bottom you will see "Huntsville Star News, Lottery Post Staff". That means I took bits from the Huntsville Star News story, and wrote the rest myself. So to say that the HSN left out something is not really the case, since the story is really my own doing. If anyone left something out, it was me.
However, I don't think there was anything left out. An e-mail sent to people from an unknown source within the lottery is not a verified news source. Many times such e-mails are written by underlings, without direct input from officials. That would not make it an "official" statement. It's more like good info that should be confirmed by an official. The information posted to their web site can be considered "official".
I am indeed trying to get the whole story. I think that much is apparent. I am also trying to do so in a way that exposes as much as possible, while remaining ethical and factual.
I hope this clears things up. It's not an exact science.
Did anyone catch the toll free number that the Tennessee lottery gave out to call for info ?
It is a sex chat line !!!!
I saw this on CNN today.
http://search.tennessean.com/sp?aff=100&keywords=lottery
rebecca paul needs to be replaced.
Why would Tenn. change the system. People keep buying tickets and the MSM doesn't report the story. So far it looks like a very profitable system for Tenn. You can't expect modern journalists to cover something as difficult as mathmatics.
For the record random.org has a good explaination as to why computer based RNGs are not used in scientific research and truely random generators that are used by no current lottery. None of the current computer based lottery RNGs are random so it's all a guess as to how much favor the state is getting in each case.
Hot Lotto (MUSL) uses a radioactive decay method for their RNG, which I believe is considered truly random. However that's only one part of the equation. The other part is unsolvable: computers can be hacked.
Ask around to any person knowledgeable about writing programming for computers and they will tell you that computers can't really randomize numbers. They are Pseudo-Random. Meaning they have a pattern and are never really random at all. It isn't possible to do.
Pseudo-Random was discovered during WWII when the Germans code was broke that they used to send what they thought to be random lettering that only the receiving machine could decipher. The first computer ever made was the size of a factory and used to break their code.
Still today computers can't make anything totally random without making a pattern.
*i was going to add an url that tells more about it but the rules here won't allow me to do that*
This is the reason that a computer was never used in the first place for the lottery.
I'm very surprised that the news stations haven’t looked into this tidbit of information yet.
Good luck in all you do,
Google Junky
that is interesting google junky because i saw a special on vegas cheaters on the travel channel and they talked about hackers figuring out how to break the code of the slot machines because the slot machines arent really random and any sequence can be predicted. the guy who was busted use to make the slot machines so he knew exactly how to predict the winners. i didnt know the lottery computers worked the same way but i knew i didnt want tennessee to go RNG
That is a nice point about the email replies that the lottery gave. But why did they even reply or have someone reply back if their email reply meant nothing. Somebody had to tell who ever responded to the emails something to tell the public in the first place so I don't believe that crap. Besides there were several days that had passed since the email was sent and the reply came back., granted I did send my email in to them on a Sat. Yes, they could say it was the weekend, but I didn't get a reply back until Wed. That was plenty of time for me to beleive they tested the machine like they said they did. The TN lottery is trying to dodge everything as if they were angels naive to all that happened. They pull this crap about in the past the midday draw went 16 days or so without a double, well that was the randomness of a ball drawing and people could understand that because doubles did fall in the other games. Like someone else posted in this thread, I think TN will have the quads come out soon to try and shut people up. Well when they do fall I will be happy to all who chose to continue to get ripped off by this so called RNG game that they have more control over, but Rebecca and her crew won't get a bonus from me. As far as I'm concerned Tn has only one lottery game, "Powerball" and that is all I will play there. 1$ with a power play. and with the jackpot at 300 mil I will play 3 plays tonight.
Todd,
I think you make a great point about the e-mail as a verifiable news source. And I certainly understand and agree with you as to getting to the facts and remaining ethical. But Like Mystikal I gotta wonder:
1. Who at the Tennessee Lottery sent those emails and what is the source of their authority to respond in such a manner?
2. From whom and where did they get their information?
3. Did someone in a position of authority at the Tennessee Lottery provide the information and authorize the sending of said e-mails?
I must reiterate that this is the best chance ever to discredit the propaganda of the wonderfullness of RNG's and therefore, rid ourselves of them forever. And if it has to be done by discrediting the Tennessee Lottery then I say so be it. They brought this on themseves and they must be held accountable for their actions and their words.
I really hope the mainstream press and the people of Tennessee don't just roll over and accept this nonsense. There are too many unanswered questions here and too many contradictions to just let it fade away.
It is obvious to me that the Tennessee Lottery has no credibility in this matter and that should be exploited. Just look at the following:
1. They said a glitch like this could never happen but it did.
2. They said the program was flawed and could not produce doubles But they (at least someone affiliated with the Tennessee Lottery) said they tested the program and they got doubles during the test.
3. They said it is not uncommon for doubles to occur for long periods of time and cited examples that were proven to be false.
Like Mystikal said they are trying to dodge everything and they need to be hammered with their own words!
Jim
UJ, I agree, and I have stated the same points in other posts. If you go back and see my previous posts when the story was breaking, I believe I was the first to raise these issues -- about the conflict in statements coming from the lottery. My comments above were strictly related to the writing of news stories, not my personal opinions.
I think many email responses are generic in nature meaning that depending on the question. They have a list of answers and whomever is handling the emails just simply clicks on the appropriate reply or the next best reply to a question.
Rarely will a person get a detailed specific personally typed reply from them.
From talking to different people whom have worked for the lottery in my home town. There are literally hundreds of emails form people mostly complaints about why their numbers don't come out why triples haven't been drawn, when are you going to draw my numbers. I was one number off every other day home come you didn't draw my picks, the lottery is ripping me off. Stuff like this.
So my guess is whomever is handling the emails desk dreads having to reply individually to each and every email and that's why we get generic replies.
Over the years having been asked the same questions over and over they have created a list of automated responses. And for the most part the average person wouldn't know it was an automated response unless they have emailed the lottery in the past and got a similar response.
Moreover just about all the lottery's use the same type responses especially the one that says
Quote: we value the integrity of our games and do everything to insure ------- yadda yadda.
So what's going on with this mess in Tennessee now? In the last few days I haven't seen any stories, news or comments? Are there any updates or is this story going to die? A lot of outrage and then business as usual?
Jim
If I were a State Lottery Offical....(God Forbid)
My first thought ...... if I were entertaining changing from normal draws to computer draws would be .....How would we make sure the draws were RANDOM ?
Someone selling me software for my lottery drawings would have to convince me there were "Checks and Balances" in place .. that would ALERT on NON random events taking place each day for several days in a row.
There is software that test such things ! Where was it? Am I crazzzzy or shouldn't this be normal operating procedure in all these computer drawing softwares?
Secure and auditable
http://www.tstglobal.com/
Why should ....... "Lay people" have to be the ones doing the Alerts... and getting ignored by the STATE? History has shown....Americans don't like to be ignored by the Government very much!
There was a new story posted this morning.
Thank you Todd!
Jim
i'm pretty sure there won't be too much time that elapses before there is a new 'flaw' tennessee discovers.they'll do the same thing as they did last time.nothing until they have to......