Not worth a reply?
I may be, as you say "a newbie" but I wanted to give you a chance to explain your system before hand. One of the reasons I wanted to let you explain your method is this. At one point I actually thought your numbers were the result of real facts and results figures. That is the way you would like us to take it isn't it.
Guess what? People who do use software see things you can't see. You're just a software newbie judging from your lack of response or proof, and don't want to discuss the real historical results.
Now, the results are all in, and your numbers, I'm sorry to say, are just random and they certainly don't compute! If I'm wrong I will be happy to look over your work but there isn't any to show is there? No.
Now you may reply in one of two ways, but unless you can show your work using proofs and numbers just forget it. Hysterical responses are a waste of time and people know they're just a cover up.
By the way, I like your avatar photo, what are you looking down at? Are you counting ? Just fingers and toes I presume, since you don't use software.