From the post that I made days ago, those were real Tx draws:
---------------
Tx Pick 3 Midday
Last draw on top.
Mostly Low and Mostly High.
As always, mistakes are very possible on all of my posts, so beware!
3 6 8 H
0 3 9 L
9 0 7 H
1 8 1 L
2 7 1 L
8 4 5 H
8 1 0 L
6 7 8 H
1 8 5 H
4 0 6 L
2 4 8 L
4 1 3 L
5 1 1 L
7 8 9 H
9 3 1 L
0 9 1 L
7 5 4 H
1 6 9 H
7 5 5 H
2 1 1 L
6 1 4 L
1 9 3 L
7 0 7 H
6 7 4 H
2 5 6 H
9 8 6 H
7 5 9 H
-----------------------------
Those are about 27 past draws from oldest down to newest on top, they are some days old.
About 13 or 14 draws are half of them, High-Low is 50-50.
In the long run maybe we might get Half High and Half Low patterns, more or less, those might be harder to figure out unless special software is made just for that.
So I have to go with short term patterns.
I have to think that what often happens (At least in short sections of past draws) will keep on happening later on future draws, but that does not have to be true, not at all.
I have to work without statistics other than what I myself can see on relatively short sections of past draws, LP's last 10 past draws are available without too much trouble.
I used to be a fair pick 3 predictor because I kept the game and prediction on my mind every day, I often looked at the past draws, meditated on them and often made very many filters workouts, little by little I developed some kind of filters intuition.
Well, I got tired of having the pick 3 game on my mind for so much of my awake time every day.
It was very hard to quit thinking so much about it, but little by little I was able to for the most part leave it alone.
The intuition and a lot of the knowledge went away little by little with time.
----------
What I used to do was not quite prediction, it was forecasting, the numbers might come out or not, it was-is all what appear(s) to be chances.
-------
There on those draws there seems to be 14 Highs and 13 Lows, but nowdays I don't see too well, so I could be wrong.
Anyhow, if right, then it is as it should be, this does not mean that on all such sections of past draws will always be like that.
We (I) want to see if there is a way to beat random at all, even to some small degree.
------------
There are 27 past draws there so if we had picked to Only PLay the High Pattern, or Only the Low Pattern, we might have Won about Half of the Time, remember I am not talking about making a profit, just about doing better than by Random Chance.
So there the worst that we might have done (Maybe) in the very long run is to come somewhere about close to even with Random Chance.
---------------
That is why we should go a little deeper in our observations and take a little closer look.
----------------
On those few past draws If we had kept on playing the same pattern, be it low or high until it changed, then maybe we would have done better, let us see.
No, with that technique there we would still have won only about half of the time.
------------------
Now we know again why I never before bothered with 50-50 filters.
Instead, if we would know more or less for sure that during a given number of past draws half of the draws more or less would have 1 particular pattern and another half the oder, as it happened on these 27 past draws, then we could try to use that.
--------------
As it is, because it is 1 50-50 pattern, we know to it should switch to another pattern from the one before before way too long.
For example on those draws it went for no more than 5 draws that we can see there before it changed from High to Low patterns and more often from 1 to 4 draws before there was a change.
So knowing that maybe a progression betting technique could be use, the problem with that is that because it is a 50-50 filter one has to buy half of the total draws and only a very very rich person can afford that.
----------------
That is why I stayed away from 50-50 filters.
---------------
More to come later sometime, this is not finished yet.