A lawsuit launched by a New Westminster, British Columbia, woman who claims she was tricked out of her equal share of a $12.6 million lottery jackpot is going to a full trial.
A B.C. Supreme Court judge has ruled that the legal action filed by Maria Ganguin over the winning Canada Lotto 6/49 ticket against her ex-business partner, Maria Fehr, and her husband, Daniel Fehr, should be settled with full testimony before a trial judge.
The defendants sought to have the matter resolved in a summary trial where the ruling would be based primarily on affidavits.
The plaintiff sought a full trial, in which the Fehrs' credibility could be tested under cross-examination. The B.C. Lottery Corporation is also a defendant in the legal action.
Ganguin and Maria Fehr previously ran a catering business together and had agreed that each could regularly use money from their business to purchase lottery tickets.
They agreed to equally divide any prize money.
Maria Fehr claimed that the $20 she used in November 2008 to buy the winning lottery ticket came from her husband, not from a cash box in one of the two delivery trucks she owned with Ganguin.
After the jackpot was announced, Ganguin signed a waiver for the B.C. Lottery Corporation in which she accepted that the winning ticket was not purchased through their business.
Ganguin alleged that Maria Fehr initially told her that Daniel Fehr had bought the winning ticket.
She became suspicious later when she read in a newspaper article that Maria Fehr had purchased the ticket while on her coffee truck route and that her business partner was the first name on the check issued by the BCLC.
After consulting a lawyer, Ganguin proceeded with the lawsuit.
Justice Trevor Armstrong, in his ruling last week, said there is no independent evidence showing whether the fateful ticket was bought with money from the cash box or from Daniel Fehr.
In the absence of such evidence, said Armstrong, the plaintiff's only hope is for a trial judge to disbelieve the defendant's evidence after hearing cross-examination of both parties.
"Although Ms. Ganguin may have a steep uphill struggle to shake Ms. Fehr's credibility," wrote Justice Armstrong, "it is my view it would be unjust to deprive Ms. Ganguin of a full trial."
Thanks to w794728 for the tip.
Here we go again,someone is sueing someone else for a share of the lottery winnings and the attorneys will make out like bandits.
If she signed the waiver because she was told that the ticket was purchased by the husband (dh - darling husband), it shows that she was willing to believe that she had no part... it sounds like she only changed her mind once the story changed to being her BUSINESS partner (with whom she did have a lottery pooling agreement - using 'common money' from their joint business) having purchased the ticket and HER name somehow being on the winning check...
Sounds like it could be an interesting trial.
I believe that suing is one of America's favorite past times. When all else fails, start suing anyone and everyone!
This is in Canada.
Sorry DC81. Suing is one of Canada's favorite past times.
When players make kind of a general agreements about buying lottery tickets those kinds of a general agreements don't usually work when one of them wins because every one have their own interpretations of the agreement.
It's hard for liars to keep their lies straight sometimes.
If she told her partner that her husband bought it then she shouldn't have told everyone else that she bought it while driving the company vehicle.
I think that's gonna prove to be a 6 million dollar mistake.
I agree, especially, if it's being reported in the newspaper!!
"had agreed that each could regularly use money from their business to purchase lottery tickets."
I sure hope it was a bit more specific than that. As written, it makes the typical office pool with only a verbal agreement and a rotating group of members look like a well thought out plan by a genius.
"Say NO to office pools "
Too late. Already involved in a 5$ pool with players from four different countries who still think a wheelbarrel is two buckets hanging on a stick. Our win tonight will make story of the year.
still think a wheelbarrel is two buckets hanging on a stick
Never play the Lottery with another person !!!!!!!!
Unless it happens to be your spouse or best friend.
I hope that I would think enough of my partner that I would want to share.
Which is it, mcginnin56, America's or Americans ... OR Canada's or Canadians?
Americans and Canadians.
It is high time for Lawyer Control!
is that done with cattle prods and leg irons?
Preferably with anchors weights, holding them all pinned down at the bottom of the deepest ocean (Pacific), while all chained to each other.
Sigh...another day another lottery related lawsuit.
On a positive note ............ I won $12 again with a Powerball with Powerplay ticket!
......... surely there won't be a lawsuit ........
"Ganguin signed a waiver for the B.C. Lottery Corporation in which she accepted that the winning ticket was not purchased through their business."
It looks like Ganguin changed her mind and wants to show a jury her 6.3 million reasons why.
"In the absence of such evidence, said Armstrong, the plaintiff's only hope is for a trial judge to disbelieve the defendant's evidence after hearing cross-examination of both parties."
The only evidence Fehr needs is the signed waiver by Ganguin and that can be presented without Fehr testifying unless the rules of law are different in Canada. Basically Armstrong is saying Ganguin's entire case, if there is one, is based on Fehr presenting evidence against herself.
LOL, Someone always has to pee in the pool, ...no more pools people.
Nicely done dp! You sure we weren't in a pool together??
Don't worry, I won't sue.
Apparently 1 in 5 adults admit to it, which makes me wonder how many people do and don't admit to it.
I haven't swam in a public pool for years and won't be any time soon.
ok now y'all are making me rethink the pool parties that my family has planned for the summer
Nope, I don't either.
Just tell everyone, you have a special chemical in the pool, and if they don't follow the rules, they be dyed blue for weeks.
**giggle/chortle/snort**
My friend and I told that to the boys a couple years ago, when they got out of the pool, they all checked to see if they were dyed blue.
I just threatened the g'kids... they grinned at me, but ds2 and ds1 both came in and asked me if I was serious and to please not do it... LOLOL I love my life.
you have the crux of the case just there.
the waiver because she was told the husband bought the ticket. and then finding not only was it bought on truck route, but that her own name was on the original check!