Personally, I prefer that the Game I analyze is based on RNG. That way it is my computer vs. their computer. It is a war game that I am addicted to like people are hooked on any other computer game. The ultimate goal is to pick the numbers so often that the State goes back to the physical process that can be observed. The war has to be won on 2 Fronts. The first is cracking the code. While we are all trying our best to crack that code, in a dark room somewhere it is watching us and adjusting output to thwart our best efforts. I know it sound impossible but WE can win. To do so WE need a Nobile Goal. I propose that that Goal is the Banishment of the RNG. The fact that the side benefit will be winning lots of money is worthy of further discussion and WE will all have guard against losing site of the Nobile Goal. OUR attempts to Crack the Code should be accompanied by Diplomatic Efforts to ride ourselves of the RNG Over-Lord.
That is not my Forte. I leave that part to ANY of you that can help. I prefer my own dark room with my own Computer searching for the Magic Box (Reference Box) that can crack the code. I don’t play so I have to keep my eye on the Nobile Goal while getting lost in what ifs and self satisfaction from successful process creation. Since this all just occurred to me, I’m not sure how I will do and I can’t rule out playing so I will have to deal with all that anyway.
I know, It sounds Nuts; “BUT”? There is always a “BUT”. So my current “BUT” will probably sound even more Nut’s; BUT, what if we had an analysis of every Possible Reference Box for like say 2x2, 3x3, 3x4, 4x4. Definitely Nut’s since for example a 3x3 box has 10 to the ninth combinations; BUT, What if we had the Data? If we could see when any Box was a winner over any period of time of the lottery’s past could a Pattern of Alternating Boxes be the Key? Would other methods of analysis find the Key. Nice dream but first comes the Data. In my dark room I have figured out a process to Create Reference Boxes derived by several sorting and selection methods discussed in a separate thread on the Lottery System Forum. Since I just made Rooky it is time to learn how to include threads, next time. What came out of the process is a way to fill any Box and run it back through the Lottery Data to check for weeks it produced a winner. I am using a Spread Sheet, the main component of my addiction, in this case Excel to do the process. Macros in the file produce the data extremely fast until the file grows large and slows down the process. Still with 10 to the 6 combinations of the 3x3 box alone may take a life time to generate them all. The Plan is to focus on enough successful Boxes to a Pattern. Spread Sheets may prove to limited or cumbersome to complete the process. Since both sides of the coin are important you can’t know all there is to know until you look at all of every Boxes success and failures. Failures are as important as Success and tell us what not to do. Since I don’t have the Super Computer required to generate and process all of this data I will be Stopping at Intervals hoping to see if a Patterns that Crack the Code. ANY of you can join me in the fight. I am a zealous Rooky with lot’s of determination. ANYONE willing with their own Platform can join the fight. WE just need to spread the load and not duplicate efforts. WHO’S WITH ME?
Nature has already shown her Randomness. Patterns are required for us to view the physical and what we chase in the case of the lottery, all to try to glimpse the future. You can view the closed environment of a Ball Machine” and watch the selection process, try to imagine what makes one ball get sucked up the tube and not another. Instead of just Computers lets get Physics back in the Game. LET’S DO IT FOR PHYSICS
LET’S TAKE THE LOTTERY BACK FROM THE r n g