United States
Member #171,727
January 11, 2016
127 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by lakerben on Jan 23, 2016
Last night's mega million 21 25 40 46 56 mb 3
6401.
No one said to wheel all the numbers. Selectivity is the key. Its knowing when to use them for p3,4,5 and jackpot games. Give up the weak arguement.
The theory works. If you don't like it don't bash it. No one is impressed with the paragraphs of verbage!
So someone posts a bunch of numbers and if some combination hits you claim he's predicted a winner but if someone points out that all his predictions add up to so many combinations that it is no better than random chance you announce that you have to be "selective" which numbers to play.
I'd suggest if Dr Miracle wants his "selective" method to be considered a success he actually has to tell us which numbers are selected prior to the drawing, not afterwards.
Otherwise he's shooting a bunch of shots into the side of a barn, finding a few clustered together afterwards, drawing a bulleye around them and announcing he is a sharpshooter.
Have you ever wondered why every single person who has contributed a substantial number of predictions to the prediction board shows a loss rate right around the 50% that many lotteries pay out? It isn't a coincidence and it isn't a coincidence that people who keep promoting systems are careful to not allow their predictions to be put to a real test because, like I showed with the JADE system I tested against 4 months of Minnesota draws, it produced results completly consistent with random chance. There is a reason for that, balls bouncing around in a box do not care in the slightest which of them was picked last week or the week before or indeed any time in the past. There also isn't a force of nature that affects balls bouncing around in a cage based on a number written on them.
But don't let that stop you from enjoying buying lottery tickets, everyone needs a hobby and if you find it enjoyable to sift through old lottery results thinking they reveal the future, I say have a great time. Just expect to lose 50-80% of every wager over time.
United States
Member #90,247
April 24, 2010
13,817 Posts Online
Quote: Originally posted by dddwww on Jan 23, 2016
So someone posts a bunch of numbers and if some combination hits you claim he's predicted a winner but if someone points out that all his predictions add up to so many combinations that it is no better than random chance you announce that you have to be "selective" which numbers to play.
I'd suggest if Dr Miracle wants his "selective" method to be considered a success he actually has to tell us which numbers are selected prior to the drawing, not afterwards.
Otherwise he's shooting a bunch of shots into the side of a barn, finding a few clustered together afterwards, drawing a bulleye around them and announcing he is a sharpshooter.
Have you ever wondered why every single person who has contributed a substantial number of predictions to the prediction board shows a loss rate right around the 50% that many lotteries pay out? It isn't a coincidence and it isn't a coincidence that people who keep promoting systems are careful to not allow their predictions to be put to a real test because, like I showed with the JADE system I tested against 4 months of Minnesota draws, it produced results completly consistent with random chance. There is a reason for that, balls bouncing around in a box do not care in the slightest which of them was picked last week or the week before or indeed any time in the past. There also isn't a force of nature that affects balls bouncing around in a cage based on a number written on them.
But don't let that stop you from enjoying buying lottery tickets, everyone needs a hobby and if you find it enjoyable to sift through old lottery results thinking they reveal the future, I say have a great time. Just expect to lose 50-80% of every wager over time.
like I showed with the JADE system I tested against 4 months of Minnesota draws.
United States
Member #171,727
January 11, 2016
127 Posts
Offline
Yes, it is the Mathematics section. I took all of the JADE One Hit Wonder picks from Jan 10. 2010 through April 2010, put them in a spreadsheet and compared them with the Minnesota numbers drawn for those same dates, computed the winning amounts, summed them up and ended up with an average loss of 50% of the bet over the large number of tickets, very close to what a random selection of numbers would have produced.
Florida United States
Member #144,285
June 30, 2013
716 Posts
Offline
Dr, M, I have been reading your work as well and understand why you grouped the numbers together as you did. Tremendous power behind these numbers and all grouped together just like they should be. My real thought was that this wasn't a coincidences and wondered where you got your real training. I assume you got this knowledge from a career job and this is a "fun" hobby. Well applied and good work...=)
United States
Member #169,540
October 23, 2015
124 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by dddwww on Jan 23, 2016
So someone posts a bunch of numbers and if some combination hits you claim he's predicted a winner but if someone points out that all his predictions add up to so many combinations that it is no better than random chance you announce that you have to be "selective" which numbers to play.
I'd suggest if Dr Miracle wants his "selective" method to be considered a success he actually has to tell us which numbers are selected prior to the drawing, not afterwards.
Otherwise he's shooting a bunch of shots into the side of a barn, finding a few clustered together afterwards, drawing a bulleye around them and announcing he is a sharpshooter.
Have you ever wondered why every single person who has contributed a substantial number of predictions to the prediction board shows a loss rate right around the 50% that many lotteries pay out? It isn't a coincidence and it isn't a coincidence that people who keep promoting systems are careful to not allow their predictions to be put to a real test because, like I showed with the JADE system I tested against 4 months of Minnesota draws, it produced results completly consistent with random chance. There is a reason for that, balls bouncing around in a box do not care in the slightest which of them was picked last week or the week before or indeed any time in the past. There also isn't a force of nature that affects balls bouncing around in a cage based on a number written on them.
But don't let that stop you from enjoying buying lottery tickets, everyone needs a hobby and if you find it enjoyable to sift through old lottery results thinking they reveal the future, I say have a great time. Just expect to lose 50-80% of every wager over time.
dddwwww
we get it you are negative on the lottery and feel like it is a game of random chance with impossible odds.
Not all of us feel that way and enjoy playing and reading up on these pattern theories and other mystical theories.
Ok back to being positive now....
Further investigation of this is warranted. At the very least such a pattern would be helpful
if you were wheeling a large set. You could power number the pairs. :)
United States
Member #51,267
April 3, 2007
529 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by dddwww on Jan 23, 2016
So someone posts a bunch of numbers and if some combination hits you claim he's predicted a winner but if someone points out that all his predictions add up to so many combinations that it is no better than random chance you announce that you have to be "selective" which numbers to play.
I'd suggest if Dr Miracle wants his "selective" method to be considered a success he actually has to tell us which numbers are selected prior to the drawing, not afterwards.
Otherwise he's shooting a bunch of shots into the side of a barn, finding a few clustered together afterwards, drawing a bulleye around them and announcing he is a sharpshooter.
Have you ever wondered why every single person who has contributed a substantial number of predictions to the prediction board shows a loss rate right around the 50% that many lotteries pay out? It isn't a coincidence and it isn't a coincidence that people who keep promoting systems are careful to not allow their predictions to be put to a real test because, like I showed with the JADE system I tested against 4 months of Minnesota draws, it produced results completly consistent with random chance. There is a reason for that, balls bouncing around in a box do not care in the slightest which of them was picked last week or the week before or indeed any time in the past. There also isn't a force of nature that affects balls bouncing around in a cage based on a number written on them.
But don't let that stop you from enjoying buying lottery tickets, everyone needs a hobby and if you find it enjoyable to sift through old lottery results thinking they reveal the future, I say have a great time. Just expect to lose 50-80% of every wager over time.
I just noticed someone on the prediction board "winning" a decent amount of time, so I thought it was interesting. Then I checked the number of games this person was playing against the payout and the FULL picture became clear. Spending $50 to get one 3/5 combo for $10 is still losing, even if you won every day.