Madison, WI United States
Member #172,970
February 11, 2016
515 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Edibs3 on Mar 8, 2016
So, everyone here agrees right?
After all these many years, and thousands of post on thousands of Systems, we "got nothing!"
Nothing here has even gotten close to breakeven, the only thing we can hope for is some sort of game changes in ODDS or bigger pay outs.
It is disappointing that no one even hinted at a break even System.
Most of what came out was "Negative Expectation" conversation.
Until we can get better payouts or better odds from the State Lotteries, we're dead in the water with "Systems"
Hmmm.. I don't think everyone here agrees. Many people seem to be spending hours upon hours working systems to beat pick 3. They wouldn't be doing that if they agreed.
The problem as I see it is all of the systems that are based on prior draws are only valid if the future draws are not actually random. If the draws are random, then looking at past draws does not offer any help in determining future draws. If the draws are not random, either intentionally or by accident, then there could be a system that exploits that. If you found it, you probably would not want to post anything about it publicly as the administrators of the draws would likely be able to fix it pretty quickly and you would have to start all over.
At this point, I personally do not believe the lottery would intentionally not use a truly random system in pick3/pick4 games as they make a huge profit actually using random. It is possible that when using a computer program to "randomly" pick numbers, a flaw in the program would be accidentally present that would lead it to not be truly random. One issue though is for you to actually figure out how it is not random would likely take an analysis of millions of its draws, which we won't have access to in our lifetime. Also, the administrators could simply change programs every once in a while to make it even more unlikely.
The only "system" that conceptually has validity to me right now is some form of progressive wagering. To really do this though would take a deep bankroll and a willingness to accept some very high risk plays. You could profit for some time and lose all of it very quickly.
Madison, WI United States
Member #172,970
February 11, 2016
515 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by mjwinsmith on Mar 8, 2016
California
Statistic
Current Month
Last Month
Current Year
Last Year
Lifetime
Pick 3
Picks
391
1,767
3,848
17,283
233,366
Hits
11
11
29
101
1,260
Hit Ratio
2.81%
0.62%
0.75%
0.58%
0.54%
Winnings
$690
$1,020
$1,990
$9,070
$117,710
Prize Ratio
176.47%
57.72%
51.72%
52.48%
50.44%
Colorado
Statistic
Current Month
Last Month
Current Year
Last Year
Lifetime
Pick 3
Picks
203
777
1,602
7,508
21,212
Hits
1
10
11
44
124
Hit Ratio
0.49%
1.29%
0.69%
0.59%
0.58%
Winnings
$330
$900
$1,230
$4,170
$12,150
Prize Ratio
162.56%
115.83%
76.78%
55.54%
57.28%
Minnesota
Statistic
Current Month
Last Month
Current Year
Last Year
Lifetime
Pick 3
Picks
203
809
1,768
8,372
112,963
Hits
1
6
14
51
562
Hit Ratio
0.49%
0.74%
0.79%
0.61%
0.50%
Winnings
$290
$490
$1,560
$3,660
$55,680
Prize Ratio
142.86%
60.57%
88.24%
43.72%
49.29%
Indiana
Statistic
Current Month
Last Month
Current Year
Last Year
Lifetime
Pick 3
Picks
391
1,709
3,732
16,855
215,774
Hits
4
5
18
78
1,123
Hit Ratio
1.02%
0.29%
0.48%
0.46%
0.52%
Winnings
$410
$490
$2,260
$5,660
$112,720
Prize Ratio
104.86%
28.67%
60.56%
33.58%
52.24%
Georgia
Statistic
Current Month
Last Month
Current Year
Last Year
Lifetime
Pick 3
Picks
391
1,553
3,286
15,814
218,904
Hits
6
3
17
68
1,048
Hit Ratio
1.53%
0.19%
0.52%
0.43%
0.48%
Winnings
$490
$370
$1,550
$6,880
$105,090
Prize Ratio
125.32%
23.82%
47.17%
43.51%
48.01%
Louisiana
Statistic
Current Month
Last Month
Current Year
Last Year
Lifetime
Pick 3
Picks
203
843
1,848
8,828
114,433
Hits
7
0
16
44
625
Hit Ratio
3.45%
0.00%
0.87%
0.50%
0.55%
Winnings
$530
$0
$1,680
$5,750
$67,980
Prize Ratio
261.08%
0.00%
90.91%
65.13%
59.41%
New Jersey
Statistic
Current Month
Last Month
Current Year
Last Year
Lifetime
Pick 3
Picks
391
1,630
3,523
16,468
229,017
Hits
6
4
14
80
1,149
Hit Ratio
1.53%
0.25%
0.40%
0.49%
0.50%
Winnings
$490
$660
$1,310
$7,280
$113,240
Prize Ratio
125.32%
40.49%
37.18%
44.21%
49.45%
North Carolina
Statistic
Current Month
Last Month
Current Year
Last Year
Lifetime
Pick 3
Picks
433
1,806
3,925
17,210
143,710
Hits
5
17
29
81
733
Hit Ratio
1.15%
0.94%
0.74%
0.47%
0.51%
Winnings
$700
$1,430
$2,660
$6,650
$65,080
Prize Ratio
161.66%
79.18%
67.77%
38.64%
45.29%
Tennessee
Statistic
Current Month
Last Month
Current Year
Last Year
Lifetime
Pick 3
Picks
466
2,193
4,651
21,419
208,954
Hits
8
16
35
154
1,096
Hit Ratio
1.72%
0.73%
0.75%
0.72%
0.52%
Winnings
$570
$1,220
$3,270
$13,310
$108,950
Prize Ratio
122.32%
55.63%
70.31%
62.14%
52.14%
Washington, D.C.
Statistic
Current Month
Last Month
Current Year
Last Year
Lifetime
Pick 3
Picks
391
1,675
3,652
16,773
229,449
Hits
2
4
13
103
1,129
Hit Ratio
0.51%
0.24%
0.36%
0.61%
0.49%
Winnings
$580
$490
$1,600
$8,320
$104,530
Prize Ratio
148.34%
29.25%
43.81%
49.60%
45.56%
West Virginia
Statistic
Current Month
Last Month
Current Year
Last Year
Lifetime
Pick 3
Picks
153
668
1,427
7,207
97,125
Hits
6
1
8
36
452
Hit Ratio
3.92%
0.15%
0.56%
0.50%
0.47%
Winnings
$490
$40
$570
$4,020
$48,580
Prize Ratio
320.26%
5.99%
39.94%
55.78%
50.02%
MJ, are those your playing statistics. If so, looks like in the long run you are about at the odds overall, 50% payback. Good month so far in March though!
United States
Member #391
June 8, 2002
18,275 Posts Online
Quote: Originally posted by Wisconsin3054 on Mar 8, 2016
MJ, are those your playing statistics. If so, looks like in the long run you are about at the odds overall, 50% payback. Good month so far in March though!
Those are my Prediction Results for the Pick-3 games posted here on the Lottery Post.
As you well can see from the stats, overall in the long run I am at about average (Fifty Per Cent), now the trick is to make 'Dat Money while you are ahead of the game. Sort of playing with the houses money to make money.
Today so to speak I like a single set of Numbers for several specific states, New Jersey being just one of those states. Now playing the right set(s) and putting some good money on the number, (See My Magic Wheel), you could come away with a nice chunk of change. Hint for New Jersey Pick-3 Day, the digit #0 is due and the Pick-3 number I'm going after contains that digit.
~Michael
"What Lie is for today, is What TRUTH will seek tomorrow"
United States
Member #116,339
September 8, 2011
5,094 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Wisconsin3054 on Mar 8, 2016
Hmmm.. I don't think everyone here agrees. Many people seem to be spending hours upon hours working systems to beat pick 3. They wouldn't be doing that if they agreed.
The problem as I see it is all of the systems that are based on prior draws are only valid if the future draws are not actually random. If the draws are random, then looking at past draws does not offer any help in determining future draws. If the draws are not random, either intentionally or by accident, then there could be a system that exploits that. If you found it, you probably would not want to post anything about it publicly as the administrators of the draws would likely be able to fix it pretty quickly and you would have to start all over.
At this point, I personally do not believe the lottery would intentionally not use a truly random system in pick3/pick4 games as they make a huge profit actually using random. It is possible that when using a computer program to "randomly" pick numbers, a flaw in the program would be accidentally present that would lead it to not be truly random. One issue though is for you to actually figure out how it is not random would likely take an analysis of millions of its draws, which we won't have access to in our lifetime. Also, the administrators could simply change programs every once in a while to make it even more unlikely.
The only "system" that conceptually has validity to me right now is some form of progressive wagering. To really do this though would take a deep bankroll and a willingness to accept some very high risk plays. You could profit for some time and lose all of it very quickly.
The prevailing thought is ' back-testing ' on prior data, the hint of 'forward testing' get a push back like crazy!
I don't subscribe to prediction based on historical data if the premise of the game is RANDOM. I suggest you read 'Super Crunches' by IAN AYERS for ideal on forward-testing by just simulation(you need a concept for the simulation).
Lets take FL , simulate each draw for the next random pool(0 thru 9)
Madison, WI United States
Member #172,970
February 11, 2016
515 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by mjwinsmith on Mar 8, 2016
Those are my Prediction Results for the Pick-3 games posted here on the Lottery Post.
As you well can see from the stats, overall in the long run I am at about average (Fifty Per Cent), now the trick is to make 'Dat Money while you are ahead of the game. Sort of playing with the houses money to make money.
Today so to speak I like a single set of Numbers for several specific states, New Jersey being just one of those states. Now playing the right set(s) and putting some good money on the number, (See My Magic Wheel), you could come away with a nice chunk of change. Hint for New Jersey Pick-3 Day, the digit #0 is due and the Pick-3 number I'm going after contains that digit.
CT United States
Member #60,057
April 4, 2008
945 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Wisconsin3054 on Mar 8, 2016
Hmmm.. I don't think everyone here agrees. Many people seem to be spending hours upon hours working systems to beat pick 3. They wouldn't be doing that if they agreed.
The problem as I see it is all of the systems that are based on prior draws are only valid if the future draws are not actually random. If the draws are random, then looking at past draws does not offer any help in determining future draws. If the draws are not random, either intentionally or by accident, then there could be a system that exploits that. If you found it, you probably would not want to post anything about it publicly as the administrators of the draws would likely be able to fix it pretty quickly and you would have to start all over.
At this point, I personally do not believe the lottery would intentionally not use a truly random system in pick3/pick4 games as they make a huge profit actually using random. It is possible that when using a computer program to "randomly" pick numbers, a flaw in the program would be accidentally present that would lead it to not be truly random. One issue though is for you to actually figure out how it is not random would likely take an analysis of millions of its draws, which we won't have access to in our lifetime. Also, the administrators could simply change programs every once in a while to make it even more unlikely.
The only "system" that conceptually has validity to me right now is some form of progressive wagering. To really do this though would take a deep bankroll and a willingness to accept some very high risk plays. You could profit for some time and lose all of it very quickly.
Read your comments . . .
My 2 cents worth
1 - losing comes with playing, its part of any system.
2 - Money management 80 for box win, you have 80 draws. A win before 80 draws is good.
3 - I think people here track many of the same filters
4 - how you did you get numbers for the current draw
Even/Odd filter, total filter, No Carryover, Carryover etc.
5 - Tracking and watching for patterns that repeat
Luck be with you!!!
NOTE: All numbers posted are BOXED and unless otherwise noted.
Madison, WI United States
Member #172,970
February 11, 2016
515 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Domeman on Mar 8, 2016
Read your comments . . .
My 2 cents worth
1 - losing comes with playing, its part of any system.
2 - Money management 80 for box win, you have 80 draws. A win before 80 draws is good.
3 - I think people here track many of the same filters
4 - how you did you get numbers for the current draw
Even/Odd filter, total filter, No Carryover, Carryover etc.
5 - Tracking and watching for patterns that repeat
Right I would agree with some of that. I think the issue dibs was looking at was in regards to point 5 of yours. Looking for patterns that repeat assumes the draws are not random. Random draws do not make predictable patterns.
If you are convinced the draws are not random, then breaking the code gets your rich. telling anyone else about it gets the code changed and you have to start all over. My concern with the effort is that if there is a code, I would expect it to be so complicated that it would take many more than a 100s or 1000s or more draws to get enough data to actually break it. If you can get a hold of the actual software used to do the draws, then you could run millions of draws and do the analysis. For ball generated draws I don't think there could be a code. But who knows?
United States
Member #391
June 8, 2002
18,275 Posts Online
Quote: Originally posted by mjwinsmith on Mar 8, 2016
Those are my Prediction Results for the Pick-3 games posted here on the Lottery Post.
As you well can see from the stats, overall in the long run I am at about average (Fifty Per Cent), now the trick is to make 'Dat Money while you are ahead of the game. Sort of playing with the houses money to make money.
Today so to speak I like a single set of Numbers for several specific states, New Jersey being just one of those states. Now playing the right set(s) and putting some good money on the number, (See My Magic Wheel), you could come away with a nice chunk of change. Hint for New Jersey Pick-3 Day, the digit #0 is due and the Pick-3 number I'm going after contains that digit.