Targets for Pick 3 Part 3Prev TopicNext Topic

• lakerben

  

  50

  New Mexico
  United States
  Member #86,096
  January 29, 2010
  24,809 Posts
  Offline
  Apr 13, 2016, 12:14 am

  ▲▼
  In response to adobea78

  Quote: Originally posted by adobea78 on Apr 13, 2016

   I am suggesting one of many ways of locating the next parameter, you don't expect me to run regression for the root sums 0 through 9, you need to set your own data and run them.

  Do root sum 6.

  I'm sitting here listening to Merle Haggard sipping some coffee!

   

  
• adobea78

  

  United States
  Member #116,339
  September 8, 2011
  5,094 Posts
  Offline
  Apr 13, 2016, 12:37 am

  ▲▼
  In response to Blackapple

  Quote: Originally posted by Blackapple on Apr 12, 2016

  Let say your current draw has the root sum 9 in North Carolina, then your focus should be what root sum/s the parameter 9 brings(this can be done by simple regression, you're trying to find 'clusters' around 9 , this will give a clear range to focus on.

  Show them..........

  RS 9> next 6,2,8> filter lead digits 8,3,6 from root sums 6,2,8 data for next picks.
• Jayhawk58

  

  United States
  Member #42,082
  June 27, 2006
  840 Posts
  Offline
  Apr 13, 2016, 9:57 am

  ▲▼
  In response to adobea78

  Quote: Originally posted by adobea78 on Apr 12, 2016

  When you track a parameter, you eliminate others, hence you focus on DUE  (longest or late), the movements of digits or parameters does not work that way. A simple example is the flip of a coin, you can't say after five Heads, tails are due(It may be good for waging strategy, not for selecting picks).Let say your current draw has the root sum 3, then your focus should be what root sum/s the parameter 3 brings(this can be done by simple regression, you're trying to find 'clusters' around 3 , this will give a clear range to focus on.

  So when you say simple regression, do you mean to say what the root sum in question has brought following or before it in the past ?

  For ex. the last few times root sum 8 appeared it was preceded by 1,4 on one occasion, 7,3 on another, and 4,7 on another.

  It was followed by 6,7 on one occasion, then 5,6 on another, and 1,6 on another.

  In conclusion, if 7 has not appeared already, it would be next. If 6 has not appeared, it would be likely, as would 4 or 1 as the least.

  This would be recent trend, could be affected by what happens most often as an average?

  Did you do your tracking today ??