Latest Theoretical Project for a Multi-system applicationPrev TopicNext Topic

• amber123

  United States
  Member #164,719
  March 12, 2015
  3,506 Posts
  Offline
  Jul 13, 2016, 10:46 pm

  ▲▼

  I just had the most powerful Idea that was staring me in my face for many years now. It was like a missing piece in a machine that could not function without it.

  Some have surely heard of using multiple systems to formulate what the next winning number will be, but based on my experiences, I've never read, heard or seen anyone monitoring 8 to 10 systems in real time. We all should know that the lottery's behavior is in league with trends. Knowing which trend it is can be deceiving despite the obvious. I won't go into detail about this, but most of you know my feelings about the pre and post tests. 

  Imagine an Excel program that shows all 10 system's activities side by side. With a quick glance you can see which system is either doing well now, or trending.

  Any thoughts?
• destinycreation

  

  South Carolina
  United States
  Member #18,321
  July 9, 2005
  1,836 Posts
  Offline
  Jul 14, 2016, 1:04 am

  ▲▼
  In response to amber123

  Quote: Originally posted by amber123 on Jul 13, 2016

  I just had the most powerful Idea that was staring me in my face for many years now. It was like a missing piece in a machine that could not function without it.

  Some have surely heard of using multiple systems to formulate what the next winning number will be, but based on my experiences, I've never read, heard or seen anyone monitoring 8 to 10 systems in real time. We all should know that the lottery's behavior is in league with trends. Knowing which trend it is can be deceiving despite the obvious. I won't go into detail about this, but most of you know my feelings about the pre and post tests. 

  Imagine an Excel program that shows all 10 system's activities side by side. With a quick glance you can see which system is either doing well now, or trending.

  Any thoughts?

  What 8 - 10 systems are you referring to ???
• helpmewin

  

  100

  u$a
  United States
  Member #106,660
  February 22, 2011
  19,960 Posts
  Offline
  Jul 14, 2016, 1:23 am

  ▲▼

  Any thoughts?

   

  yes i think you maybe over thinking

  
• SilverLion

  

  United States
  Member #165,533
  April 12, 2015
  563 Posts
  Offline
  Jul 14, 2016, 5:54 am

  ▲▼
  In response to helpmewin

  Quote: Originally posted by helpmewin on Jul 14, 2016

  Any thoughts?

   

  yes i think you maybe over thinking

  Any thoughts?

  How about maybe, take another

   

   

  and call me in the morning!!!
• bobby623

  

  San Angelo, Texas
  United States
  Member #1,097
  January 31, 2003
  1,648 Posts
  Offline
  Jul 14, 2016, 12:34 pm

  ▲▼
  In response to amber123

  Quote: Originally posted by amber123 on Jul 13, 2016

  I just had the most powerful Idea that was staring me in my face for many years now. It was like a missing piece in a machine that could not function without it.

  Some have surely heard of using multiple systems to formulate what the next winning number will be, but based on my experiences, I've never read, heard or seen anyone monitoring 8 to 10 systems in real time. We all should know that the lottery's behavior is in league with trends. Knowing which trend it is can be deceiving despite the obvious. I won't go into detail about this, but most of you know my feelings about the pre and post tests. 

  Imagine an Excel program that shows all 10 system's activities side by side. With a quick glance you can see which system is either doing well now, or trending.

  Any thoughts?

  I have two paper and pencil workouts - one for P3/P4 and another for Texas Lotto, Cash 5, Two-Step and Triple Chance.
  The second is good for the predator jackpot games, but I'm not one of those born every minute suckers who spend lot of money chasing impossible dreams.
  I learned long ago that trying to win with lottery software prediction systems with outputs based on game design parameters, rather than real-life outcomes is ludicrous.
  Tracking multiple games requires a lot of time and work, but I don't have much else to do.
  Over the years, I noticed some similarities between Decade A in Cash 5, and Decade A in Two-Step, but these events don't arrive often enough justify exploitation.
  Maybe someone who has never tracked a lottery game, or who doesn't know how to track a game, might be impressed and believe they can use the coincidental similarities to make a buck, but it's just 'nice to know but so what' stuff to experience game trackers.
  There are many theories about what does and what doesn't work where lottery analysis is concerned.
  Trying to compare or match the outputs of different games is a monumental waste of time.
  Too bad all that energy is not being used to discover useful trends in a game that can be won.
• looking4$

  

  Dana Point, CA
  United States
  Member #138,469
  January 28, 2013
  149 Posts
  Offline
  Aug 1, 2016, 1:13 pm

  ▲▼

  I have been trending 5 different approches to the California bonus ball games for the last three years using Excel. All 5 trends are in the same test block. I can easily see what trend has the upper hand quite easily. My problem is I don't have time to analize each one individually and find each individual trends' hot & cold periods.It does take ALOT of time doing five at a time. Not enough hours in the day. I don't have enough programing skills to shorten the time of calculations.
• Coin Toss

  

  Zeta Reticuli Star System
  United States
  Member #30,469
  January 17, 2006
  11,788 Posts
  Offline
  Aug 2, 2016, 12:16 am

  ▲▼

  amber123,

  The lotteries have such equipment and then some!

  Those who run the lotteries love it when players look for consistency in something that's designed not to have any. So many systems, so many theories, so few jackpot winners. 

  

  There is one and only one 'proven' system, and that is to book the action. No matter the game, let the players pick their own losers.
• BobP

  

  Dump Water Florida
  United States
  Member #380
  June 5, 2002
  3,577 Posts
  Offline
  Aug 3, 2016, 2:47 am

  ▲▼

  I think winning will shift from system to system with no indication which you should play next.
  
  There was a software that ran thousands of simple systems and for more money added thousands more, but they were all simple addition and subtraction systems, plus one, plus two, etc.  was not predictive.
  
  I do think it is a good idea to track draws, like Pick-3 to see whether evening follows midday more often then midday following midday or evening following evening, such as a digit from the previous draw appears in the next, when working your system.
  
  BobP
• Lildarryl

  

  South Carolina
  United States
  Member #155,837
  May 31, 2014
  2,001 Posts
  Offline
  Aug 3, 2016, 4:11 am

  ▲▼

  let me email win D. And see what the Godfather of daily games say...

   

  Once i get the percentages ill let you know.   Good luck

  my name Lil Darryl   you got some Milk