has anyone received 1.7 yet??Prev TopicNext Topic

• spock

  

  N.ireland
  United Kingdom
  Member #2,962
  December 6, 2003
  69 Posts
  Offline
  Mar 8, 2004, 12:22 pm

  ▲▼

  Hi Vick let us know if it is any quicker.
• vick

  

  Canada
  Member #2,859
  November 23, 2003
  463 Posts
  Offline
  Mar 8, 2004, 1:00 pm

  ▲▼

  yes it seems quicker, at least at the default 30,000 sample rate,
• lottosyncman

  

  langley b.c.
  Canada
  Member #3,313
  January 10, 2004
  155 Posts
  Offline
  Mar 8, 2004, 6:05 pm

  ▲▼

  running mine at 12000 samples as my computer is looking at 74 hours to process at 30000 samples  it seems to me that if we were dealing at 650 samples with 1.6 and now we are at 12000 to 30000 samples we will have to have a much better prediction
• vick

  

  Canada
  Member #2,859
  November 23, 2003
  463 Posts
  Offline
  Mar 8, 2004, 6:43 pm

  ▲▼

  i'm hoping that it now selects some of the past draws results

  for instance on my slower computer i have it running at 30,000 and it said it would take about 16 to 19 hrs

  on my faster computer i have it at 50,000 and it says about the same 16 to 19 hours

  i notice that it doesn't show any numbers predicted as it goes, mabye it waits to finish till the end to show all 10 ????? though it does show a progress like  at 15,000 string builds it will say 50 % done, i guess because 15,000 is 1/2 of 30,000, but i hope it's not 50 % just for say 1 or 2 numbers !!! i hope it's 50 % for all 10 !!!!!!!

   

  Goodluck
• lottosyncman

  

  langley b.c.
  Canada
  Member #3,313
  January 10, 2004
  155 Posts
  Offline
  Mar 8, 2004, 7:19 pm

  ▲▼

  i think this could be a very long process coming up with the numbers to play[but i'am not complaining ] if it does the job of at least giving me 3 numbers every other draw i will be more than happy! my setting is at 12000 i wont be done until tomorrow night its too bad the program didnt detail the most ideal setting on the game you play it sure would be alot less monkeying around!!! as ron popeil said in his informercials JUST SET IT AND FORGET IT! lol!
• vick

  

  Canada
  Member #2,859
  November 23, 2003
  463 Posts
  Offline
  Mar 9, 2004, 1:44 am

  ▲▼

  took about 14 hours on
• paul762

  

  United Kingdom
  Member #3,002
  December 11, 2003
  542 Posts
  Offline
  Mar 9, 2004, 2:28 am

  ▲▼

  not even received mine yet, but i thought it was meant to be quicker!! 74 hour predictions are just no use to me, i play dailies !!
• vick

  

  Canada
  Member #2,859
  November 23, 2003
  463 Posts
  Offline
  Mar 9, 2004, 9:32 am

  ▲▼

  paul if you have a fast computer and are using a low sample and low ball count i think it goes pretty quick
• lottosyncman

  

  langley b.c.
  Canada
  Member #3,313
  January 10, 2004
  155 Posts
  Offline
  Mar 9, 2004, 5:39 pm

  ▲▼

  hey vick what numbers did it predict want to do a comparison???? pm me in my mail box and i will do the same!!!! maybe this way we can find out faster the ideal setting for the can 6/49
• vick

  

  Canada
  Member #2,859
  November 23, 2003
  463 Posts
  Offline
  Mar 9, 2004, 7:55 pm

  ▲▼

  i sent a pm to you lotto man

  well i've run 4 sets so far with my 649 and 1 of the set had 1 number from the last draw, so at least that's fixed at least for now !