lottosync 1.7 at 12000 samplesPrev TopicNext Topic

• Guru

  Belgium
  Member #2,220
  September 2, 2003
  553 Posts
  Offline
  Mar 13, 2004, 4:16 am

  ▲▼

  reddog:

  Time estimation depends on the max. availability of the cpu. If you start the process while no other time consuming processes are running, it will give an estimation based on aprox. 100% cpu availability.

  Ofcourse, when you work on your computer this may start to change heavily depending on how much cpu power is left.
• reddog

  

  Durham, North Carolina
  United States
  Member #1,616
  June 5, 2003
  4,752 Posts
  Offline
  Mar 13, 2004, 11:48 am

  ▲▼

  When will V. 1.8 be ready?

  Taking it one day at a time, because there's no way to know what might have been.
• vick

  

  Canada
  Member #2,859
  November 23, 2003
  463 Posts
  Offline
  Mar 13, 2004, 8:57 pm

  ▲▼

  i got 7/10 on the keno tonight using lottosynch 1.7 [which i have to heavily modify to use with keno], IMAGINE what we could do with a full KENO version !!)
• paul762

  

  United Kingdom
  Member #3,002
  December 11, 2003
  542 Posts
  Offline
  Mar 16, 2004, 3:11 am

  ▲▼

  very much looking forward t
• lottoshlep

  

  BC
  Canada
  Member #2,120
  August 19, 2003
  258 Posts
  Offline
  Mar 16, 2004, 10:23 am

  ▲▼

  Quote: Originally posted by Guru on March 12, 2004
  

  ---

  
  
  

  It is also possible for instance that you start it at 70000, when you see after a while that it is gonna take too long, you can stop it and restart it (continue aborted prediction) at a lower sample like 30000 or so. Intermixing diff. sample sizes in 1 prediction, will not ruin your prediction.

  
  

  ---

  
  

  
  

  OK, this may prove to be a lame Q (I will try this at a later date when time permits):

  Say that 50K samples were set, prog has reached 45K and player runs out of time. Decision is made to go to the next available lower setting of 40K and 'continue aborted prediction'.

  What will happen? Will the program accept this without 'ruining' the prediction, terminate and display predictions at 45K? Or will it truncate and display preds at 40K? Or .... ??

  Has anyone tried this yet? 
  

  if at first you don't succeed ... destroy all evidence you ever tried   
• spock

  

  N.ireland
  United Kingdom
  Member #2,962
  December 6, 2003
  69 Posts
  Offline
  Mar 16, 2004, 11:20 am

  ▲▼

  I was trying 100,000 but i still had 8 or 9 hours Togo so i changed it to 70,000  ten numbers appeared immediately only sat will prove if any good?One repeat the rest below 20. We  are due low Numbers on Irish lotto.