MADDOG10's Blog

BRRRRRUUUUHAHAHAHAHA, Nose picker is about as clueless as ninnies on a bull hog. 

Blaming the Republicans for not addressing the ban on assault weapons. These school killings have nothing to do with a weapon of Choice! What is it going to take for the low-life lefties to realize, that it's a Mental Health problem, NOT a weapon problem? If a deranged individual wants to kill someone, they'll get whatever weapon is available. The cow field is chock full of Cow Dung like the garbage the Lefties spew out. The next thing they'll be saying is that the Sky is falling! The left's agenda is just like CNN's agenda. False pretense, False reporting, False agendas.

Touch`e, Nose Picker!

Pennsylvania Attorney General and Governor-elect Josh Shapiro released a statement about the arrest giving details about the crimes and expressing the importance of election integrity.

“In advance of the 2023 municipal elections, this arrest is an important reminder that interfering with the integrity of our elections is a serious crime,” Shapiro said.

Upon investigation, authorities found that several Democratic candidates hired Crews to get them on the ballot, as reported by the Daily Caller.

Here's a question everyone needs to ask themselves. If GAS was at $5.00 a gallon, and now the prices are dropping, how come they got that high to begin with?

Well, here is a true reason. The Democrats have threatened the oil companies with a loss of subsidies if they didn't lower the cost. Now, if you will notice the price of gasoline is coming down, but the price of Diesel is still way higher than it should be, so ask yourself why. That reason is, that there are more cars on the roads than trucks correct?

OK! now let's get back to the original question, why the sudden drop in price? People, open your eyes, the midterms are right around the corner, and the Democrats know full well what is on the horizon. So, this is their salvation so to speak, to salvage as many votes as possible, while still pulling the wool over the American public. If you can't figure this out, and you vote then you are part of the problem.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out why the cost of living is so high. EVERYTHING you buy, eat, or have delivered is by truck. Boats, loaders, and Generators are all powered by diesel fuel. Everything is connected to the price of Diesel. 

 The bottom line is this: DO NOT be fooled by the sugar coating you are seeing today, after the elections you will see the sugar turning to Salt.

Democrats are fixated on Power and Greed, all you have to do is open your eyes and look around. I'm not portraying Republicans as saints, they have some bad apples as well, but they are more for the American people and their values than Democrats.......JUST THINK!! 

Dem's 'Jan 6 Insurrection' Claims Blown Apart by Harvard Study - Obliterates Jan 6 Committee's Credibility

 By  Brett Davis  July 31, 2022, at 1:58pm

A new Harvard study throws cold water on characterizing the breaching of the Capitol by rioters on Jan. 6, 2021, as an “insurrection.”

According to the study conducted by the Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy, more than 40 percent of rioters were motivated by former President Donald Trump’s claims the 2020 presidential election was stolen from him, as well as a desire to see him re-elected.

According to  The Harvard Crimson, researchers found that 20.6 percent of rioters were motivated by wanting to support Trump, while another 20.6 percent of rioters cited Trump’s election claims as the reason they stormed the U.S. Capitol more than 18 months ago in a bid to thwart certification of now-President Joe Biden’s election.

Less than percent were motivated by a “desire to start a civil war or an armed revolution,” the Crimson reported.

The study has been released as a working paper because it has not yet been peer-reviewed, according to the Crimson.  It is titled,  “‘President Trump Is Calling Us to Fight’: What the Court Documents Reveal About the Motivations behind January 6 and Networked Incitement.”

It found a smattering of other causes as well, including “pursuit of historical significance” (7.43 percent), “protect the country or ‘take back'” the country” (5.76 percent), and even “Marxism, socialism, communism” (5.76 percent).

Study authors Joan Donovan, Kaylee Fagan, and Frances E. Lee wrote that their analysis found the largest portion of defendants were “motivated, in part, to invade the U.S. Capitol Building by Donald Trump,” according to the Crimson.

Donovan  is the research director at the Shorenstein Center.  Fagan  is a Shorenstein research fellow.  Lee  is a professor of politics and acting chairwoman of the department of politics at Princeton University.

The documents show that Trump and his allies convinced an unquantifiable number of Americans that representative democracy in the United States was not only in decline but in imminent, existential danger,” the study said.

“This belief translated into a widespread fear of democratic and societal breakdown, which, in turn, motivated hundreds of Americans to travel to D.C. from far corners of the country in what they were convinced was the nation’s most desperate hour.”

In other words, it was the exact opposite of “insurrection.”

While the Harvard study is not complimentary toward Trump, of course, in that it paints a picture of a cult of personality as the main reason for the violence, it does damage the narrative put forth by Democrats and the mainstream media that an “insurrection” took place that day.

An  insurrection  has traditionally been defined as an organized attempt by a group of people to defeat their government and take control of their country, usually by violence.

1. Canceling drilling leases and limiting domestic production

Since taking office, Biden has taken too many steps to count to limit domestic production. These include  halting federal permits  for oil and gas drilling and leasing shortly after taking office and  blocking drilling  in a major oil-rich Alaskan region.

To be clear, these decisions will mostly affect  future  production. But that does still significantly affect gas prices because companies factor in their expectations about the future into the decisions they make today.

“Some say that new leases … would have taken time and would not yet be online, but even so, there is evidence that expectations of increased future supply has a beneficial impact on current prices and expectations of future supply drying up has a negative impact on current prices,” the Competitive Enterprise Institute’s Ben Lieberman said.

“At a day-to-day level, I am hearing from drillers that they are having a very hard time getting all the approvals they need from [the Environmenatl Protection Agency] and other agencies in order to produce on existing wells, and of course, new federal leasing has come to a halt,” Lieberman added.

It’s just basic economics that when the government throttles future supply in an industry, that will lead to higher prices both now and in the future. Biden was warned by many critics at the time that this would happen, but he proceeded anyway.

2. Choking regulations that impose big costs and lead to higher prices

Speaking of basic economics, it’s well established that when businesses’ costs rise, that puts upward pressure on the prices they charge consumers. The oil and gas industry is no exception.

And unfortunately, the Biden administration has both proposed and implemented a  wide array of regulations on the energy sector, inflicting billions in direct financial costs and incalculable indirect compliance costs — plus further harming expectations for the future.

“The regulatory chokehold imposed by the Biden administration on oil production in place of a Green New Deal has drastically raised gasoline prices, thereby hurting lower-income people the most,” said conservative economist Vance Ginn, who served in the Trump administration.

“This is yet another example of the high cost of big-government environmentalism when the better approach is to remove government barriers so that free markets can better let people adapt to changes in the environment at a much lower cost,” Ginn concluded.

3. Anti-energy rhetoric that discourages investment

Rhetoric matters. While words don’t  literally  do anything to change gas prices, the signals coming from policymakers absolutely do affect the long-term investment decisions businesses make.

And even as a presidential candidate, Biden sent very negative messages about what his leadership would mean for the gas industry.

In just one example, as Americans for Tax Reform  pointed out, Biden said during a campaign stop: “We are going to get rid of fossil fuels. … We’re going to phase out fossil fuels.” Then, upon taking office, the president followed these words with actions such as canceling the Keystone XL pipeline, blocking leases, restricting imports, and pursuing regulations.

In general, Biden’s open hostility toward the oil and gas industry has almost certainly curbed investment into production that otherwise would’ve occurred.