Fined for illegal clearing, family now vindicated

Published:

 -- Proof that other english-speaking nations are run by idiots, too: From Australia --

They were labelled "law breakers"Scared, fined $50,000 (costing $100,000 after legal fees) and left emotionally and financially drained.

But seven years after the Sheahans bulldozed trees to make a fire break -- an act that got them dragged before a magistrate and penalised -- they feel vindicated. Their house is one of the few in Reedy Creek, Victoria, still standing.

The Sheahans' 2004 court battle with the Mitchell Shire Council for illegally clearing trees to guard against fire, as well as their decision to stay at home and battle the weekend blaze, encapsulate two of the biggest issues arising from the bushfire tragedy.

Do Victoria's native vegetation management policies need a major overhaul? And should families risk injury or death by staying home to fight the fire rather than fleeing?

Anger at government policies stopping residents from cutting down trees and clearing scrub to protect their properties is already apparent. "We've lost two people in my family because you d--kheads won't cut trees down," Warwick Spooner told Nillumbik Mayor Bo Bendtsen at a meeting on Tuesday night.

Although Liam Sheahan's 2002 decision to disregard planning laws and bulldoze 250 trees on his hilltop property hurt his family financially and emotionally, he believes it helped save them and their home on the weekend.

"The house is safe because we did all that," he said as he pointed out his kitchen window to the clear ground where tall gum trees once cast a shadow on his house.

"We have got proof right here. We are the only house standing in a two-kilometre area."

-------------------------------

The clearing was of trees located on their "own" property. Roll Eyes

I'm doubting they'll be getting their money back.

full story at www.smh.com.au/national/fined-for-illegal-clearing-family-now-feel-vindicated-20090212-85bd.html

(Locked)
Entry #211

Comments

Avatar Rick G -
#1
Oz used to seem like a good alternative to USrael but it looks like they're drinking the fluoridated Kool-Aid too. Antarctica is looking more appealing. No fedgov to steal your money and kill/torture/terrorize people with the proceeds.
Avatar konane -
#2
Environazis need a long arduous hands on course in land management, fire prevention. Better yet they should be on the front lines fighting some of the fires their legislation has caused.
Avatar justxploring -
#3
Interesting story, time*treat. Although I strongly believe in protecting the environment and endangered species, we also need to use common sense too.   This sounds like one of those cases where protecting the homes and the families should have been a priority.   

I wouldn't like anyone telling me what trees I can cut down or plant. That said, when I lived on Sanibel Island there are many rules to protect the wildlife and it's one of my favorite places. It's clean, safe and people mind their own business. (it's also too expensive for my budget) However, you often have to put up with a lot of annoyances, i.e. a woodpecker eating your house. But sometimes there are good reasons for rules, Rick. Brazilian pepper trees and other harmful plants look pretty so people plant them. Fences prevent the natural course of wildlife, outside lights confuse and disorient loggerheads & their hatchlings,   I keep hoping they'll be a no smoking law for all the beaches. I'm so sick of picking up other people's dirty butts. Actually, I believe in shoot first, ask later when it comes to littering. ;-)

Rick, if people start building homes & condos in Antarctica, I can guarantee you'll see golden arches around the corner in 10 years or less. They'll just need a wider drive-thru for the icebreakers.   However, if you don't mind the cold, it's probably very quiet there. Average temp is minus 60 F in winter.
Avatar time*treat -
#4
Lol - Antarctica.
Oz was on my "short list" many years ago, too, just from pictures of the "outback". Stories like this remind me of why they are no longer on that list. I'll wait until they re-open under new management.
Avatar Rick G -
#5
@ t*t, Well, I hope their new management is better than our new management. Seems like the "new" management kept the same poor supervisor that ran the company into the ground in the first place.

Post a Comment

Please Log In

To use this feature you must be logged into your Lottery Post account.

Not a member yet?

If you don't yet have a Lottery Post account, it's simple and free to create one! Just tap the Register button and after a quick process you'll be part of our lottery community.

Register