Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )

Quick Links

USA Mega Lottery Results Gadget for Windows Vista

NetConnect

Internet Domains, simple and cheap

Find a domain name:

  Home

Petition for True Lottery DrawingsMegaplier Petition

Millionaire senator wins $853K in lottery

Topic closed. 29 replies. Last post 4 years ago by CASH Only.

Page 2 of 2 BackGo to Page
Print E-mail Link
sirbrad's avatar - Lottery 062
Standard Member
Advanced
PA
United States
Member #23322
October 6, 2005
1822 Posts
Offline
Posted: October 21, 2005, 6:44 pm - IP Logged

Oh? Seems to me that it favors the rich about 90% of the time. If that is not discrimination I don't know what is. Perhaps 'favoritism of the least needy' is another term for it.

Avatar
Standard Member
Advanced

United States
Member #10921
January 23, 2005
863 Posts
Offline
Posted: October 22, 2005, 1:56 pm - IP Logged

Having more money already means one can buy more tickets. Having more money also means being less likely to want to win anything less than hundreds of millions. Big jackpots like that one are more likely won by the already rich because they otherwise wouldn't play.

Avatar
Standard Member
Experienced
Sparta, NJ
United States
Member #18644
July 9, 2005
1977 Posts
Offline
Posted: October 22, 2005, 2:05 pm - IP Logged

Having more money already means one can buy more tickets. Having more money also means being less likely to want to win anything less than hundreds of millions. Big jackpots like that one are more likely won by the already rich because they otherwise wouldn't play.

I kinda doubt those in the Fortune 500 sent their crews out to spend a few thousand on tickets. They're making too much money to get involved in something with horrible odds. The lottery is for the lower tier of hummanity, not the upper tier. You really think the Queen of England is contributing to UK Lotto? Or are you letting emotion over rule logic?

Cheers

|||::> *'`*:-.,_,.-:*''*:--->>> Chewie  <<<---.*''*:-.,_,.-:*''* <:::|||

I only trust myself - and that's a questionable choice

RJOh's avatar - chipmunk
Standard Member
Top 25 Poster
Elite
mid-Ohio
United States
Member #9
March 24, 2001
10548 Posts
Offline
Posted: October 22, 2005, 2:07 pm - IP Logged

LckyLary,

Sounds like you're saying rich people don't play games like pick3 hoping to get a box hit for $40, so in those type games, poor people are competing with other poor people, but when the jackpot is $200M or more, the poor people are going to be competing with the rich people so it should be expected a few rich people are going to win once in a while.  It's just a matter of who's playing the game.

I Agree! RJOh

* What happens most *
 * will most likely happen again *


United States
Member #380
June 5, 2002
11297 Posts
Offline
Posted: October 22, 2005, 3:26 pm - IP Logged

It would have been VERY interesting if he hit the jackpot. How much of his winnings would he have donated?

Avatar
Gold Member
Advanced
Greenwich, CT
United States
Member #4879
May 24, 2004
1822 Posts
Offline
Posted: October 22, 2005, 4:01 pm - IP Logged

It would have been VERY interesting if he hit the jackpot. How much of his winnings would he have donated?

So he's worth $7 million now.  $115 million after hitting the jackpot.

You would be worth $105 million after hitting the jackpot.

He shouldn't donate any more money than you should.

Avatar
Standard Member
Experienced
Sparta, NJ
United States
Member #18644
July 9, 2005
1977 Posts
Offline
Posted: October 22, 2005, 4:38 pm - IP Logged

If he is like most people with money, they have an accountant that tells them the exact amount to donate.  Nothing more, nothing less. If you gave a bunch every time you saw a battered wife, and child with cancer, a starving Ethiopian, or a hurricane victum, you would soon be broke.  If every person above the poverty level gave away everything they had above the poverty level, it would not even make a dent in the suffering in the world.  The bleeding hearts want you to think it would, but it won't.  Tomorrow there will still be suffering.  There will never be a shortage of people who have less than you; intentionally or otherwise. The answer? Smile! Convince yourself to be happy! Donate your five dollars to the local church, then take the family out for pizza. Be happy. Those kids in Uganda that are having their heads chopped off will never know. But you will be happy. In the end, isn't that what counts? Convincing yourself things are sunny - not gloomy!

Cheers

|||::> *'`*:-.,_,.-:*''*:--->>> Chewie  <<<---.*''*:-.,_,.-:*''* <:::|||

I only trust myself - and that's a questionable choice


United States
Member #16902
June 2, 2005
3493 Posts
Offline
Posted: October 22, 2005, 7:06 pm - IP Logged

Congratulations to Senator Gregg for getting 5 numbers, but missed the PB. How off did Gregg's PB was when the PB was 29?

bellyache's avatar - 64x64a9wg
Standard Member
Experienced

United States
Member #12856
March 18, 2005
2060 Posts
Offline
Posted: October 22, 2005, 7:11 pm - IP Logged

He should just donate as much as he wants. I don't think he should give up half or more of his winnings just because others believe he should. But if he wants to give up half that's fine to.

Dance like no one is watching.

Avatar
Standard Member
Rookie

United States
Member #24847
October 23, 2005
109 Posts
Offline
Posted: October 23, 2005, 3:24 pm - IP Logged

forgive me, but, who spends 20 dollars on a whim?

 

i hope that's not indicative of how our tax money is being spent.... ;)

Bradly_60's avatar - disney37
Standard Member
Veteran
Atlantic Mine, Michigan
United States
Member #417
June 23, 2002
1593 Posts
Offline
Posted: October 23, 2005, 3:28 pm - IP Logged

Well if he is a millionaire then $20 is like $.50 to normal people.  And he is entitled to that money.  He works for it.  Just like the money we spend at WalMart goes to there employees....we don't care how they spend it.  Just because there salaries come from some of our taxes should give us the right to say how they can spend it.

Brad

wreakshavok777's avatar - enzyte thumb
Standard Member
Regular
oklahoma
United States
Member #12548
March 10, 2005
165 Posts
Offline
Posted: October 23, 2005, 3:33 pm - IP Logged

anyone can play but it takes somebody lucky to win! thats all it is.

Avatar
Standard Member
Top 100 Poster
Advanced
New Mexico
United States
Member #12540
March 10, 2005
2987 Posts
Offline
Posted: October 23, 2005, 3:41 pm - IP Logged

forgive me, but, who spends 20 dollars on a whim?

 

i hope that's not indicative of how our tax money is being spent.... ;)

Almost everyone in America. 

A couple of hamburgers, cold drinks for two.

A movie for two with popcorn.

A leisurely drive somewhere burning seven or eight gallons of gas.

Roses for the wife.

A bit of fishing tackle.

A carton of smokes.

A CD of a favorite musician.

A concert (for one)

A new shirt, tie, blouse, pair of sneakers.

And so on.

Anyone in America who doesn't spend $20 on a whim is a rare piece of work.

Of course that's how tax money's being spent.  Take a look at the cars wearing government tags, the offices the employees occupy, the computers they use.

But, of course, you already know all that.

Jack

 

Absorb the good, ignore the bad, weigh the ugly.

It's about number behavior.

Egos don't count.

 

Dedicated to the memory of Big Loooser

 

Avatar
Standard Member
Experienced
Sparta, NJ
United States
Member #18644
July 9, 2005
1977 Posts
Offline
Posted: October 23, 2005, 3:45 pm - IP Logged

forgive me, but, who spends 20 dollars on a whim?

 

i hope that's not indicative of how our tax money is being spent.... ;)

Women call that "spontaneity" – they crave that in men all the time. I bet every married woman on this site would be elated if their husband spent $20.00 on flowers once in a while. How about a quick dinner out, instead of the left-over meat loaf scheduled? A $20.00 splurge on a chance on millions, should be any different?

Cheers

|||::> *'`*:-.,_,.-:*''*:--->>> Chewie  <<<---.*''*:-.,_,.-:*''* <:::|||

I only trust myself - and that's a questionable choice


United States
Member #380
June 5, 2002
11297 Posts
Offline
Posted: October 23, 2005, 7:11 pm - IP Logged

Sneakers cost more than $20 a pair. My Skechers "Superman Sneakers" were given to me.

 
Page 2 of 2 BackGo to Page