Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited August 20, 2008, 4:52 pm

N.C. lottery director says lower payouts could hurt sales

N.C. lottery director says lower payouts could hurt sales

Posted: 3/9/2006 7:18:00 AM

North Carolina Lottery

The law requiring the North Carolina lottery to return at least 35 percent of all ticket sales to state education programs could inhibit sales and ultimately cost the state money, according to the lottery's executive director and other experts.

To meet the requirement, North Carolina will pay out less to winners than neighboring states offer. Tom Shaheen, director of the state lottery and a past president of the North American lottery trade association, said that could mean fewer tickets are sold. Dedicating more money to prizes encourages more people to buy tickets and leads to more money for the state, experts say.

"I wouldn't say it's scientifically an absolute, but I believe it personally from my experience in the lottery," Shaheen said.

South Carolina's lottery director, Ernie Passailaigue, said he likes that his state doesn't dictate how much the lottery must give to education programs.

"Politicians don't understand this," said Passailaigue, a former state senator. "But the players understand this very much. If they buy the games and do not have very pleasant experiences - either through the dollars won or the repetitiveness of the wins - they are either not going to play or else go somewhere where they have a better chance."

South Carolina will pay out 61 percent of its sales revenue in prizes this year, he said. Virginia and Georgia are paying about 58 percent and Tennessee paid about 54 percent last year.

North Carolina's first batch of scratch-off lottery tickets will offer about $79.5 million in prizes. That's at least $10 million less than what Virginia and Georgia would pay and at least $14 million less than what winners would get in South Carolina.

Several states have seen success by increasing their payout percentages, while Texas saw a steady decline in business when it reduced its payouts from 60 percent of sales to 50 percent in 1997. Lawmakers reversed their decision two years later.

California, Ohio, Colorado, Connecticut, Washington and other states saw significant increases in sales and profits after increasing the percentages paid in prizes in recent years.

"What they understand is that it's a volume business and that more sales is the way to bring in more actual dollars," Shaheen said. "We like to say that you don't pay for scholarships with a percentage. You pay for them with real dollars."

State Sen. Tony Rand, D-Cumberland, said he doesn't recall how the 35 percent requirement made its way into law, but says he wouldn't object to a revision if it would mean more money for schools.

"If there's a better way to skin the cat," he said, "then the cat better look out."

Source: AP

Standard Member
Senior
Coastal Georgia
United States
Member #2703
October 30, 2003
1868 Posts
Offline
Posted: March 9, 2006, 7:21 am - IP Logged Top

Why am I not surprised ?

 

                               

              

 

 

Standard Member
Experienced
chicago
United States
Member #3746
February 10, 2004
382 Posts
Offline
Posted: March 9, 2006, 8:46 am - IP Logged Top

Ive been saying this all along. Higher paybacks means more net income as more people will play. But states love to be stingy. And since you get taxed on winnings, more people will win so you will sort of get that increased payback money a bit back anywhere through the back door. Why would people play lotteries that payback 50% when you can go to the horsetrack and get 80% back or the casino and get 90%+ back?

Standard Member
New Member
New Member
Washington,NC
United States
Member #32005
February 1, 2006
7 Posts
Offline
Posted: March 9, 2006, 11:21 am - IP Logged Top

people will play nc lottery. will they have pick 3

Platinum Member
Top 100 Poster
Senior
Charlotte NC
United States
Member #17704
June 18, 2005
3222 Posts
Offline
Posted: March 9, 2006, 11:55 am - IP Logged Top

State Sen. Tony Rand, D-Cumberland, said he doesn't recall how the 35 percent requirement made its way into law, but says he wouldn't object to a revision if it would mean more money for schools.

A legal way for the grabbers to get their cut.



https://takeemtothebank.com

'We must deliberately be aware of our choices.
All issues of justice & social responsibilities flow from who we are.
We are being formed even as we form; there is constant interaction.
We are taken by what we take.  What we believe in we become.' - Charles Kollar


United States
Member #380
June 5, 2002
11297 Posts
Offline
Posted: March 9, 2006, 12:21 pm - IP Logged Top

Ive been saying this all along. Higher paybacks means more net income as more people will play. But states love to be stingy. And since you get taxed on winnings, more people will win so you will sort of get that increased payback money a bit back anywhere through the back door. Why would people play lotteries that payback 50% when you can go to the horsetrack and get 80% back or the casino and get 90%+ back?

NY Rotto pays back only 38%-40%. Let's hope NC doesn't get THAT stingy.

Standard Member
New Member
New Member
Greensboro, NC
United States
Member #21762
September 8, 2005
14 Posts
Offline
Posted: March 9, 2006, 10:17 pm - IP Logged Top

Good grief! We have some of the highest gas prices in the nation, now good ole NC is dipping in to our lottery profits. How embarrasing! Guess those Virginia trips are still a go.

Standard Member
Rookie
north carolina/virginia
United States
Member #2134
August 17, 2003
39 Posts
Offline
Posted: March 10, 2006, 8:13 am - IP Logged Top

anniep, what is wrong with our home state?? Its like a bunch of ignorant people fumbling and putting together something horrible. NC have fumbled this ball so much, its embarassing!

Platinum Member
Top 100 Poster
Senior
Charlotte NC
United States
Member #17704
June 18, 2005
3222 Posts
Offline
Posted: March 10, 2006, 5:20 pm - IP Logged Top

SmashWent to SC today and they have signs on the registers announcing that there will be lower pay outs in NC.

 



https://takeemtothebank.com

'We must deliberately be aware of our choices.
All issues of justice & social responsibilities flow from who we are.
We are being formed even as we form; there is constant interaction.
We are taken by what we take.  What we believe in we become.' - Charles Kollar

Standard Member
Experienced
Sparta, NJ
United States
Member #18644
July 9, 2005
1977 Posts
Offline
Posted: March 10, 2006, 5:41 pm - IP Logged Top

What Rocket Scientist figured out lower payouts will result in lower sales?  Can I get a copy of that brilliantly analyzed document? 

Cheers

|||::> *'`*:-.,_,.-:*''*:--->>> Chewie  <<<---.*''*:-.,_,.-:*''* <:::|||

I only trust myself - and that's a questionable choice