Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )

Quick Links

USA Mega Lottery Results Gadget for Windows Vista

NetConnect

Internet Domains, simple and cheap

Find a domain name:

  Home

Petition for True Lottery DrawingsMegaplier Petition
You last visited July 6, 2008, 7:03 am

Newspaper editorial in favor of authentic lottery drawings

Newspaper editorial in favor of authentic lottery drawings

Posted: 1/16/2008 11:24:00 AM

Editorial / Opinion

Lottery balls are preferred

The Leaf-Chronicle
Clarksville, Tennessee

Wednesday, January 16, 2008 

People do not completely trust computers. They may use them for work and for pleasure, but they don't have absolute confidence in them or in those who program them.

When it comes to the state lottery, confidence was shaken more because of a malfunction regarding the lottery's new random-number-generating computers. For weeks last summer, the Cash 3 and Cash 4 games would not produce repeating digits, such as 1-1-2 or 3-3-3-3, as winners.

The problem later was blamed on a computer coding error. The broader impression this left with Tennesseans is the machines could be programmed to pick — or not pick — certain numbers.

A bipartisan effort is under way in the state Legislature to force the lottery to return to using numbered balls to select winners for the two games. The balls are seen as having more credibility when it comes to random picks.

Gov. Phil Bredesen, who previously supported the move to computer-generated numbers, said he wouldn't stand in the way of a change back.

House Speaker Jimmy Naifeh said during a press conference, "If the balls dropping gives the people a better comfort level that it's being run right, then I think that's where we ought to go." He also said he doesn't understand the lottery's contention that it would cost $5.5 million to return to the balls.

Rebecca Hargrove, the lottery's chief executive officer and president, has said the savings largely come from not paying television stations to broadcast the drawings.

The lottery right now has a $400 million surplus. If it would truly would cost $5.5 million to ensure the integrity of the game, that would be money well spent.

The lottery also could recoup the investment because more people might play the games if they had a higher trust level in them.

Source: Leaf-Chronicle

jarasan's avatar - patrick
Platinum Member
Viva La Chance!
Senior
Rockville, MD.
United States
Member #44542
July 30, 2006
1301 Posts
Offline
Posted: January 16, 2008, 11:44 am - IP Logged Top

Balls rule!

What is your conceptual continuity?
__________________________________________________

RJOh's avatar - chipmunk
Standard Member
Top 25 Poster
Elite
mid-Ohio
United States
Member #9
March 24, 2001
8691 Posts
Offline
Posted: January 16, 2008, 11:55 am - IP Logged Top

"Rebecca Hargrove, the lottery's chief executive officer and president, has said the savings largely come from not paying television stations to broadcast the drawings."

If it cost money to have the drawings open and upfront so players can see the fairness of the results themselves, why have any drawings at all, even with the computers if the goal is to save money?

What happens most is most likely to happen again

Standard Member
Experienced
NASHVILLE, TENN
United States
Member #33768
February 20, 2006
359 Posts
Online
Posted: January 16, 2008, 12:05 pm - IP Logged Top

"Rebecca Hargrove, the lottery's chief executive officer and president, has said the savings largely come from not paying television stations to broadcast the drawings"

 

But are not TV stations playing the cartoon drawings?  Does that not cost money.  What is the difference?

CARBOB's avatar - disney18
Platinum Member
Veteran
ORLANDO, FLORIDA
United States
Member #5011
June 3, 2004
1426 Posts
Online
Posted: January 16, 2008, 12:32 pm - IP Logged Top

"Rebecca Hargrove, the lottery's chief executive officer and president, has said the savings largely come from not paying television stations to broadcast the drawings."

If it cost money to have the drawings open and upfront so players can see the fairness of the results themselves, why have any drawings at all, even with the computers if the goal is to save money?

Slowly, but surely she can see the writing on the wall. "her cash cow is going to dry up"!!! She will tap dance until the elected officials put a stop to it.

 

"the savings largely come from not paying television stations to broadcast the drawings."

What's the difference in cost between showing ball drawings or computer drawings???

four4me's avatar - image php u 13432 dateline 1172610074
Platinum Member
Top 50 Poster
Guru
MD
United States
Member #1735
June 18, 2003
4889 Posts
Offline
Posted: January 16, 2008, 7:26 pm - IP Logged Top

Rebecca Hargrove does not have to have every TV station in Tennessee record the live drawings they can have one station record the drawing and have the other stations use a little pop up window and display the drawing numbers. This opens up and opportunity for certain TV stations to bid on whom will record the live drawing. After reviewing the bids she could negotiate a contract with them for x amount of years and at the end of the term run another bidding war.  

I thought she was creative enough to do this already. In fact the whole drawing process needs to be updated in a similar fashion like all the other states that conduct ball drawings.  I do know it will take some time negotiating with the big corporations when sports programs are running because they don't like to have their broadcast being cut into however i have seen live drawings here in Md when there were games and they used a stand alone pop up window in the lower right hand corner of the screen and showed the drawings taking place.

nobie23's avatar - beargoogle
Standard Member
Top 100 Poster
Veteran

United States
Member #3066
December 12, 2003
1945 Posts
Offline
Posted: January 17, 2008, 8:13 am - IP Logged Top

Hey Littleoldlady and KyMystikal Clarksville finally mad the map Hurray!

ThatScaryChick's avatar - myselfsimis1
Platinum Member
Experienced
Idaho
United States
Member #56982
November 21, 2007
1144 Posts
Offline
Posted: January 17, 2008, 1:57 pm - IP Logged Top

I wish Idaho would get rid of computer drawings with our Pick 3 and other games.

LOTTOMIKE's avatar - treasury 4
Standard Member
Top 25 Poster
Guru
Tennessee
United States
Member #8005
October 15, 2004
11154 Posts
Offline
Posted: January 17, 2008, 10:13 pm - IP Logged Top

its simple....

                   i'm the prime example.i'm that person who played faithfully every day for three years here in tennessee UNTIL they quit with the ball drawings.i was one of your diehard players hargrove and always liked you and then you pulled this RNG stunt.i'm sure there are hundreds just like me who are patiently waiting for you to butt the hell out and bring the balls back.then you need to respecfully resign your position because your ideas aren't very creative anymore.thanks.

Gold Member
Guru

United States
Member #381
June 5, 2002
1866 Posts
Offline
Posted: January 18, 2008, 12:12 am - IP Logged Top


The TV stations might not want to bid to broadcast the lottery drawings, but I'm sure at least one in each market will want to be the Official Lottery Station that shows the draws while the other stations must make due with a pop box on the screen.  If none of the media wants the draw it isn't shown there, too bad.  Shouldn't cost any more then what they're showing now, except for paying the model, the studio should already be part of lottery headquarters or someone messed up again.   BobP