All times shown are Eastern Time (GMT-5:00) | Woman sues business partner for share of $12.6M lottery jackpot Canada 6/49: Woman sues business partner for share of $12.6M lottery jackpot4.33 Rating:A lawsuit launched by a New Westminster, British Columbia, woman who claims she was tricked out of her equal share of a $12.6 million lottery jackpot is going to a full trial. A B.C. Supreme Court judge has ruled that the legal action filed by Maria Ganguin over the winning Canada Lotto 6/49 ticket against her ex-business partner, Maria Fehr, and her husband, Daniel Fehr, should be settled with full testimony before a trial judge. The defendants sought to have the matter resolved in a summary trial where the ruling would be based primarily on affidavits. The plaintiff sought a full trial, in which the Fehrs' credibility could be tested under cross-examination. The B.C. Lottery Corporation is also a defendant in the legal action. Ganguin and Maria Fehr previously ran a catering business together and had agreed that each could regularly use money from their business to purchase lottery tickets. They agreed to equally divide any prize money. Maria Fehr claimed that the $20 she used in November 2008 to buy the winning lottery ticket came from her husband, not from a cash box in one of the two delivery trucks she owned with Ganguin. After the jackpot was announced, Ganguin signed a waiver for the B.C. Lottery Corporation in which she accepted that the winning ticket was not purchased through their business. Ganguin alleged that Maria Fehr initially told her that Daniel Fehr had bought the winning ticket. She became suspicious later when she read in a newspaper article that Maria Fehr had purchased the ticket while on her coffee truck route and that her business partner was the first name on the check issued by the BCLC. After consulting a lawyer, Ganguin proceeded with the lawsuit. Justice Trevor Armstrong, in his ruling last week, said there is no independent evidence showing whether the fateful ticket was bought with money from the cash box or from Daniel Fehr. In the absence of such evidence, said Armstrong, the plaintiff's only hope is for a trial judge to disbelieve the defendant's evidence after hearing cross-examination of both parties. "Although Ms. Ganguin may have a steep uphill struggle to shake Ms. Fehr's credibility," wrote Justice Armstrong, "it is my view it would be unjust to deprive Ms. Ganguin of a full trial." Thanks to w794728 for the tip. Vancouver Sun We'd love to see your comments here! Register for a FREE membership — it takes just a few moments — and you'll be able to post comments here and on any of our forums. If you're already a member, you can Log In to post a comment. 36 comments. Last comment 1 year ago by . S.E.Iowa United States Member #120520 December 21, 2011 534 Posts Offline | | Posted: June 6, 2012, 8:51 am - IP Logged | |
Here we go again,someone is sueing someone else for a share of the lottery winnings and the attorneys will make out like bandits. When I was a boy I was told that anybody could become President; I'm beginning to believe it. ~Clarence Darrow There ought to be one day - just one - when there is open season on senators. ~Will Rogers | | |
United States Member #124626 March 16, 2012 1459 Posts Offline | | Posted: June 6, 2012, 8:55 am - IP Logged | |
If she signed the waiver because she was told that the ticket was purchased by the husband (dh - darling husband), it shows that she was willing to believe that she had no part... it sounds like she only changed her mind once the story changed to being her BUSINESS partner (with whom she did have a lottery pooling agreement - using 'common money' from their joint business) having purchased the ticket and HER name somehow being on the winning check... Sounds like it could be an interesting trial. | | |
United States Member #52818 May 21, 2007 1394 Posts Online | | Posted: June 6, 2012, 9:03 am - IP Logged | |
| | |
United States Member #111467 May 25, 2011 6323 Posts Offline
| | Posted: June 6, 2012, 9:13 am - IP Logged | |
A lawsuit launched by a New Westminster, British Columbia, woman who claims she was tricked out of her equal share of a $12.6 million lottery jackpot is going to a full trial. A B.C. Supreme Court judge has ruled that the legal action filed by Maria Ganguin over the winning Canada Lotto 6/49 ticket against her ex-business partner, Maria Fehr, and her husband, Daniel Fehr, should be settled with full testimony before a trial judge. The defendants sought to have the matter resolved in a summary trial where the ruling would be based primarily on affidavits. The plaintiff sought a full trial, in which the Fehrs' credibility could be tested under cross-examination. The B.C. Lottery Corporation is also a defendant in the legal action. Ganguin and Maria Fehr previously ran a catering business together and had agreed that each could regularly use money from their business to purchase lottery tickets. They agreed to equally divide any prize money. Maria Fehr claimed that the $20 she used in November 2008 to buy the winning lottery ticket came from her husband, not from a cash box in one of the two delivery trucks she owned with Ganguin. After the jackpot was announced, Ganguin signed a waiver for the B.C. Lottery Corporation in which she accepted that the winning ticket was not purchased through their business. Ganguin alleged that Maria Fehr initially told her that Daniel Fehr had bought the winning ticket. She became suspicious later when she read in a newspaper article that Maria Fehr had purchased the ticket while on her coffee truck route and that her business partner was the first name on the check issued by the BCLC. After consulting a lawyer, Ganguin proceeded with the lawsuit. Justice Trevor Armstrong, in his ruling last week, said there is no independent evidence showing whether the fateful ticket was bought with money from the cash box or from Daniel Fehr. In the absence of such evidence, said Armstrong, the plaintiff's only hope is for a trial judge to disbelieve the defendant's evidence after hearing cross-examination of both parties. "Although Ms. Ganguin may have a steep uphill struggle to shake Ms. Fehr's credibility," wrote Justice Armstrong, "it is my view it would be unjust to deprive Ms. Ganguin of a full trial." Thanks to w794728 for the tip. I believe that suing is one of America's favorite past times. When all else fails, start suing anyone and everyone!  | | |
MI United States Member #55299 August 31, 2007 941 Posts Offline | | Posted: June 6, 2012, 9:17 am - IP Logged | |
This is in Canada. You can't predict random. | | |
United States Member #111467 May 25, 2011 6323 Posts Offline
| | Posted: June 6, 2012, 9:26 am - IP Logged | |
Sorry DC81. Suing is one of Canada's favorite past times. | | |
mid-Ohio United States Member #9 March 24, 2001 16129 Posts Offline | | Posted: June 6, 2012, 9:47 am - IP Logged | |
When players make kind of a general agreements about buying lottery tickets those kinds of a general agreements don't usually work when one of them wins because every one have their own interpretations of the agreement. * The fundamentals of winning a lottery jackpot * * play a lottery you can win *
| | |
Ridge Runner - Oracle of the Appalachians Way back up in them dadgum hills, son! United States Member #74415 April 28, 2009 12622 Posts Offline | | Posted: June 6, 2012, 10:58 am - IP Logged | |
It's hard for liars to keep their lies straight sometimes. If she told her partner that her husband bought it then she shouldn't have told everyone else that she bought it while driving the company vehicle. I think that's gonna prove to be a 6 million dollar mistake. . “Let us disappoint the men who are raising themselves upon the ruin of this Country.” -- John Adams | | |
ORLANDO, FLORIDA United States Member #5011 June 3, 2004 3547 Posts Offline | | Posted: June 6, 2012, 11:12 am - IP Logged | |
It's hard for liars to keep their lies straight sometimes. If she told her partner that her husband bought it then she shouldn't have told everyone else that she bought it while driving the company vehicle. I think that's gonna prove to be a 6 million dollar mistake. I agree, especially, if it's being reported in the newspaper!! | | |
Oklahoma United States Member #82920 November 12, 2009 3624 Posts Offline | | Posted: June 6, 2012, 11:26 am - IP Logged | |
It's hard for liars to keep their lies straight sometimes. If she told her partner that her husband bought it then she shouldn't have told everyone else that she bought it while driving the company vehicle. I think that's gonna prove to be a 6 million dollar mistake. 
Win BIG everyone..... I Love Pink & Green....1908 | | |
NY United States Member #24178 October 16, 2005 2544 Posts Offline | | Posted: June 6, 2012, 12:15 pm - IP Logged | |
"had agreed that each could regularly use money from their business to purchase lottery tickets." I sure hope it was a bit more specific than that. As written, it makes the typical office pool with only a verbal agreement and a rotating group of members look like a well thought out plan by a genius. | | |
British Columbia Canada Member #116120 September 4, 2011 2530 Posts Offline | | Posted: June 6, 2012, 12:24 pm - IP Logged | |
"Say NO to office pools "  "You have to be in it to win it!" | | |
Dutchess , NY United States Member #121976 January 21, 2012 1414 Posts Offline | | Posted: June 6, 2012, 1:01 pm - IP Logged | |
"Say NO to office pools "  Too late. Already involved in a 5$ pool with players from four different countries who still think a wheelbarrel is two buckets hanging on a stick. Our win tonight will make story of the year. and make your last check bounce.
| | |
British Columbia Canada Member #116120 September 4, 2011 2530 Posts Offline | | Posted: June 6, 2012, 1:10 pm - IP Logged | |
Too late. Already involved in a 5$ pool with players from four different countries who still think a wheelbarrel is two buckets hanging on a stick. Our win tonight will make story of the year. still think a wheelbarrel is two buckets hanging on a stick 
"You have to be in it to win it!" | | |
|